Skip to main content
Log in

Landscape dynamics and equilibrium in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture with short and long fallow period (Bragantina region, NE Brazilian Amazon)

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fallow periods used in slash-and-burn agriculture in the Bragantinaregion, the oldest agricultural frontier in the Brazilian Amazon, are beingreduced. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of a shortenedfallow period on the Bragantina landscape dynamics and equilibrium. Dynamicswere characterized by landscape structural changes, particularly in the spatialdistribution of secondary forests, and by transition matrix. Equilibrium wasdefined by temporal and spatial parameters, and by the increment ofagriculturalareas from 1985 to 1996, analyzed with 6 LANDSAT-TM images. I worked with 6areas of 250 ha each, 3 with short fallow periods (2–4years)and 3 with long fallow periods (about 10 years). Results showed that shortfallow period areas did not present an equilibrium situation. In these areas,developed secondary vegetation tended to disappear and agricultural areas werebeing expanded at an average rate of 3% per year. Landscape structure changespointed out that a reduction in fallow period was occurring in already shortfallow period areas. Long fallow period areas presented a shifting mosaicsteady-state condition, where punctual changes due to agricultural uses werecompensated by field abandonment rate. Both agricultural uses and fieldabandonment rates were lower in long fallow period areas when compared withshort ones. Comparisons with indigenous traditional cropping-fallow cyclesindicate that sustainable conditions could be maintained with 11 years offallowfor each cropping year, while shorter cycles would break down the system ifagricultural improvements are not implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attiwill P.M. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: The ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63: 247-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman S. 1987. Swidden in Amazonia and the Amazon rim. In: Turner B.L. II and Brush S.B. (eds), Comparative Farming Systems. Guilford Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 55-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio E.S., Moran E.F., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Land use change in the Amazon estuary: patterns of caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 22: 249-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio E.S., Moran E.F. and Mausel P. 1996. Land cover in the Amazon estuary: linking of the Thematic Mapper with botanical and historical data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 62: 921-928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L.A. 1970. On the use of Markov chains in movement research. Economic Geography 46: 393-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S. and Lugo A.E. 1990. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6: 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin H.C. 1961. The study of shifting cultivation. Current Anthropology 2: 27-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong W. 1997. Developing swidden agriculture and the threat of biodiversity loss. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 62: 187-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denich M. 1991. Estudo da importância de uma vegetação secundária nova para o incremento da produtividade do sistema de produção na Amazônia Oriental Brasileira. PhD Dissertation, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Embrapa/CPATUGTZ, Eschborn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz T.D.A.S. 1986. Caracterização climática da Amazônia Oriental. Pesquisas sobre a utilização e conservação do solo na Amazônia Oriental. Relatório final do convênio Embrapa-CPATU/GTZ. Embrapa-CPATU, Belém, Brazil, Documentos 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982a. Castanhal, Folha SA. 23.V-C-I, MI-385, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982b. Capanema, Folha SA. 23.V-C-II, MI-386, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982c. Marapanim, Folha SA. 23.V-A-IV, MI-337, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982d. Salinópolis, Folha SA. 23.V-A-V, MI-338, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P.M. 1986. Human Carrying Capacity of the Brazilian Rainforest. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P.M. 1996. Amazonian deforestation and global warming: Carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil’s Amazon forest. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 21-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P.M. and Guimarães W.M. 1996. Carbon uptake by secondary forests in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 35-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J., Krummel J., Yarnasarn S., Ekasingh M. and Podger N. 1995. Land-use and landscape dynamics in Northern Thailand: assessing change in 3 upland watersheds. Ambio 24: 328-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J.F. and Forman R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape pattern by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka S., Bell W., Thomas N., Hurtado L. and Crawford E. 1996. Slash-and-burn agriculture, conversion to pasture, and deforestation in two Brazilian Amazon colonies. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 59: 115-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher D., Möller M.R., Denich M. and Fölster H. 1997. Nutrient input-output budget of shifting agriculture in Eastern Amazonia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 47: 49-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton R.A., Lefkowitz D.S. and Skole D.L. 1991. Changes in the landscape of Latin-America between 1850 and 1985: 1. progressive loss of forests. Forest Ecology and Management 38: 143-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn C., Dees M. and Pelz D.R. 1993. Sampling aspects in the TREES project: global inventory of tropical forests. Final Report to the Joint Research Center. Freiburg Universität, Freiburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W. 1936. Das geographische System der Klimate. In: Köppen W. and Geiger R. (eds), Handbuch der Klimatologie. Bornträger, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence D., Peart D.R. and Leighton M. 1998. The impact of shifting cultivation on a rainforest landscape in West Kalimantan: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landscape Ecology 13: 135-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J. and Spies T.A. 1993. Developing alternatives forest cutting patterns: a simulation approach. Landscape Ecology 8: 63-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Discrimination between advanced secondary succession and mature moist forest near Altamira, Brazil, using Landsat TM data. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing., pp. 350-364.

  • Mausel P., Wu Y., Li Y., Moran E.F. and Brondizio E.S. 1993. Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto International 4: 61-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger J.P. 2001. Effects of deforestation pattern and private nature reserves on the forest conservation in agricultural areas of the Brazilian Amazon. Biota Neotropica (1/2) [online] http:// www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v1n12.

  • Metzger J.P. and Muller E. 1996. Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Landscape Ecology 11: 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller P.M. and Kauffman J.B. 1998. Seedling and sprout response to slash-and-burn agriculture in a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 30: 538-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E.F. 1981. Developing the Amazon. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E.F., Brondizio E., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Integrating Amazonia vegetation, land-use, and satellite data. BioScience 44: 329-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller E. 1993. Evaluation and correction of angular anisotropic effects in multidate SPOT and Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sensing of Environment 45: 295-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad D.C., Moutinho P.R., Uhl C., Vieira I.C. and Silva J.M.C. 1996. The ecological importance of forest remnants in an Eastern Amazonian frontier landscape. In: Schellas J. and Greenberg R. (eds), Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 133-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman M.J.T., Pearson C.J. and Searle P.G.E. 1984. The Ecology of Tropical Food Crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penteado A.R. 1967. Problemas de colonização e de uso da terra na região Bragantina do Estado do Pará. Coleção Amazônica. Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará, PA, USA, Coleção Amazônica, Série José Veríssimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • RADAMBRASIL 1973. Folha SA 23 São Luis: geologia, geomorfologia, solos, vegetação e uso potencial da terra. Levantamento de Recursos Naturais. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple W.J., Bradshaw G.A. and Spies T. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biological Conservation 57: 73-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52: 199-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez P.A. 1976. Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scatena F.N., Walker R.T., Homma A.K.O., de Conto A.J., Ferreira C.A.P., Carvalho R.D. et al. 1996. Cropping and fallowing sequences of small farms in the “terra firme” landscape of the Brazilian Amazon: A case study from Santarém, Pará. Ecological Economics 18: 29-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrão E.A.S., Nepstad D. and Walker R. 1996. Upland agricultural and forestry development in the Amazon: sustainability, criticality and resilience. Ecological Economics 18: 3-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva B.N.R. 1994. Levantamento detalhado dos solos em áreas destinadas a pesquisa agroflorestal no município de Igarapé-Açu, PA. Relatório de atividade de apoio ao desenvolvimento. Embrapa-CPATU, Belém, PA, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N.J.H. 1981. Colonization lessons from a tropical forest. Science 214: 755-761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Freeman and Company, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomlinson J.R., Serrano M.I., López T.M., Aide T.M. and Zimmerman J. 1996. Land-use dynamics in a post-agricultural Puerto Rican landscape (1936-1988). Biotropica 28: 525-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker J.M., Brondizio E.S. and Moran E.F. 1998. Rates of forest regrowth in eastern Amazônia: a comparison of Altamira and Bragantina regions, Pará sate, Brazil. Interciencia 23: 64-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Romme W.H., Gardner R.H., O’Neill R.V. and Kratz T.K. 1993. A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 213-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde O. and Dias C.V. 1967. A rodovia Belém-Brasília: estudo de geografia regional. Fundação IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos H.L. 1999. Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in central Amazonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 409-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira I.C.G. 1996. Forest succession after shifting cultivation in eastern Amazonia. PhD Dissertation, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira I.C.G. and Proctor J. 1999. Dinâmica de sementes e regeneração vegetativa em florestas sucessionais da Amazônia oriental. In: CATIE. Reuniões Técnicas. Vol. 9., Turrialba, Costa Rica, pp. 89-97.

  • Vielhauer K., Kanashiro M., Sá T.D.A. and Denich M. 1998. Technology development of slash-and-mulch and fallow enrichment in shifting cultivation systems of the Eastern Amazon. In: Proceedings of the Third SHIFT-Workshop., Manaus, Brazil, pp. 49-59.

  • Walker R. and Homma A.K.O. 1996. Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: an overview. Ecological Economics 18: 67-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R.T., Homma A.K.O., Scatena F.N., Conto A.J., Rodrigues-Pedrazza C.D., Ferreira C.A.P. et al. 1997. Land cover evolution of small properties: the Transamazon Highway. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 35: 115-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer W.C. 1993. Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landscape Ecology 8: 177-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metzger, J.P. Landscape dynamics and equilibrium in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture with short and long fallow period (Bragantina region, NE Brazilian Amazon). Landscape Ecol 17, 419–431 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021250306481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021250306481

Navigation