Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Children with Disabilities (1994). Screening infants and young children for developmental disabilities. Pediatrics, 93, 863–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G., Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Swettenham, J., Wheelwright, S., & Drew, A. (2000). A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age: A 6–year follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 694–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G., Charman, T., Cox, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Wheelwright, S., & Drew, A. (2001). Review paper: Screening and surveillance for autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84, 468–475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berument, S. K., Rutter, M., Lord, C., Pickles, A., & Bailey, A. (1999). Autism Screening Questionnaire: Diagnostic validity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 444–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristol-Power, M. M., & Spinella, G. (1999). Research on screening and diagnosis in autism: A work in progress. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 435–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • California Departments of Education and Developmental Services Collaborative Work Group on Autistic Spectrum Disorders (July, 1997). Best Practices for Designing and Delivering Effective Programs for Individuals with Autistic Spectrum Disorders. Available online at www.feat.org/CABP.

  • Dawson, G., & Osterling, J. (1997). Early intervention in autism: Effectiveness and common elements of current approaches. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention: Second generation research (pp. 307–326). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, S., Gillberg, C., & Wing, L. (1999). A screening questionnaire for Asperger syndrome and other high-functioning autism spectrum disorders in school age children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 129–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filipek, P. A., Accardo, P. J., Baranek, G. T., Cook, E. H., Dawson, G., Gordon, B., et al. (1999). The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 439–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J. E. (1995). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., Lang, J., Cicchetti, D. V., & Volkmar, F. R. (2000). Brief report: Interrater reliability of clinical diagnosis and DSM-IV autism field trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 163–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. et al. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, W. J., Szatmari, P., MacLean, J. E., Bryson, S. E., Bartolucci, G., Walter, S. D. et al. (1998). Reliability and accuracy of differentiating pervasive developmental disorder subtypes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 278–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owley, T., McMahon, W., Cook, E. H., Laulhere, T. M., South, M., Mays, L. Z. et al. (2001).A multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of porcine secretin in autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1293–1299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., DeVellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 91–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, K. A., & Mulick, J. A. (2000). Parental report of sleep problems in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 127–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Scales of Adaptive Behavior, Survey Form Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. L., Lee, E. B., Ashford, L., Brissie, J., Hepburn, S. L., Coonrod, E. E., & Weiss, B. (1999). Can autism be diagnosed accurately in children under three years? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L. (1993). A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, M. B., & Wiebe, M. J. (1986). A validity analysis of selected instruments used to assess autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16, 485–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar, F. R., Cicchetti, D. V., Dykens, E., Sparrow, S. S., Leckman, J. F., & Cohen, D. J. (1988). An evaluation of the Autism Behavior Checklist. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 81–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar, F. R., Klin, A., & Cohen, D. J. (1997). Diagnosis and classification of autism and related conditions: Consensus and issues.In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Ozonoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

South, M., Williams, B.J., McMahon, W.M. et al. Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations. J Autism Dev Disord 32, 593–599 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021211232023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021211232023

Navigation