Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Restraint or Stimulation? The Function(s) of the Modified Front Legs of Male Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera, Sepsidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four hypotheses that could explain the elaborate species-specific morphology of the clasping organs on the front legs of male Archisepsis diversiformis flies were tested: direct male–male combat, mechanical fit, male–female conflict of interests, and male stimulation of the female. Experimental modification of the shape of the male clasper and of the female wing base where the male clasped the female both strongly reduced the chances that a mount would result in copulation. This reduction was not predicted by the male–male combat hypothesis but was predicted by the others. Males in the field did nave to fight other males to remain mounted on females, as expected by the male–male combat hypothesis. Reduced male copulatory success was not due to inferior male ability to grasp and hold onto the female's wings, as predicted by the mechanical fit and male–female conflict hypotheses but to a reduction in the likelihood that the female would allow intromission, as predicted by the stimulation hypothesis. By a process of elimination, and in combination with data from a previous morphological study, the data support the hypothesis that the species-specific aspects of grasping organs in these flies function to stimulate females. Further behavioral data will be needed to test alternative possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, R. D., Marshall, D., and Cooley, J. (1997). Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In Choe, J., and Crespi, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 4–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. R., and Simmons, L. W. (1996). Coercive mating, fluctuating asymmetry and male mating success in the dung fly, Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 52: 737–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818–820'.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist, G. (1997). The evolution of water strider mating systems: Causes and consequences of sexual conflicts. In Choe, J., and Crespie, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist, G., and Rowe, L. (1995). Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: A morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 261: 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basolo, A. (1990a). Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav. 40: 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basolo, A. (1990b). Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in the swordtail fish. Science 250: 808–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin, T. J. (1993a). The odonate mating system, communication and sexual selection. Boll. Zool. 60: 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin T. J. (1993b). Revision of the puella group of the genus Coenagrion Kirby, 1890 (Odonata, Zygoptera), with emphasis on morphologies contributing to reproductive isolation. Hydrobiologia 262: 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, D. (1984) Antennal appendages and reproductive success in the Anostraca. J. Crust.Biol. 4: 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, W.,Müuhlhäuser, C., Morrf, C., Reusch, T., and Reuter, M. (2000). Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briceñno, R. D., and Eberhard, W. G. (2002). Courtship in the medfly Ceratitis capitata includes probable tactile stimulation with the male's aristae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).

  • Crean, C. S., and Gilburn, A. S. (1998). Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly, Coelopa ursina (Diptera: Coelopidae). Anim. Behav. 56: 1405–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Modern Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, O. (1925). Monographie der Sepsiden (Dipt.) I. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 39: 1–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, O. (1926). Monographie der Sepsiden (Dipt.) II. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 40: 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (2000). Behavior and reproductive status of Microsepsis armillata flies away from oviposition sites. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 966–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W. G. (2001a). The functional morphology of species-specific clasping structures on the front legs of male sepsid flies. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 335–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (2001b). Courtship and multi-stage transfer of material to the female's wings during copulation in Microsepsis armillata (Diptera: Sepsidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 74: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (2002). Female resistance or screening? Male force vs. female collaboration in intromission in sepsid flies. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 485–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G., and Huber, B. A. (1998). Copulation and sperm transfer in Archisepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae) and the evolution of their intromittent genitalia. Stud. Dipt. 5: 217–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, F. C. (1943). The function and comparative anatomy of the oreillets in the Odonata. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 18: 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, R. (1974). Selection for nongenitalic mating structure in female tiger beetles of the genus Cicindella (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Can. Entomol. 106: 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1949). Sepsidae. In Linder, E. (ed.) Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region, D. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nagele), Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B., and Rice, W.R. (1998). Chase-away selection: Antagonistic seduction vs. resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1981). Relationship between reproductive security and intersexual selection in a jumping spider, Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae). Evolution 35: 601–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M. D., and Petrie, M. (1997). Variations in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiger, F., and Kreiger-Loibl, E. (1958). Beiträge zum Verhalten von Ischnura elegans und Ischnura pumilio (Odonata). Z. Tierpsychol. 15: 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, J. R., and Adams, G. M. (1974). Sexual receptivity in Culicoides melleus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 126: 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, J. R., and Hinds, M. J. (1975). Quantity of the male ejaculate influenced by female unreceptivity in the fly Culicoides melleus. J. Insect Physiol. 21: 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, J. R., and Mook, M. S. (1975). Behavioural interaction between sexually experienced Culicoides melleus (Coquillett) (Diptera Ceratopogonidae). Behaviour 54: 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1979). Mating behavior and natural selection. Fla. Entomol. 62:17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loibl, E. (1958). Zur Ethologie un Biologie der deutschen Lestiden (Odonata). Z. Tierpsychol. 15: 54–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mø ller, A. P. (1994). Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1972). Reproductive behaviour of Sepsis cynipsea (L.) (Diptera: Sepsidae). I. Preliminary analysis of the reproductive strategy and its associated behaviour patterns. Behaviour 41: 172–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pont, A. (1979). Sepsidae. Diptera Cyclorrhapha Acalyptrata. Handbook for the Identification of British Insects, Vol. 10,5(c), pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. G., and Paterson, H. E. H. (1982). Mate recognition and mechanical isolation in Enallagma damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Evolution 36: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. L. (1998). Possible female choice during copulation in Ozophora baranowskii (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): Female behavior, multiple copulations, and sperm transfer. J. Insect Behav. 11: 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. M., and Porter, A.H. (1989).The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, K. (1999). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Black Scavenger Flies (Diptera: Sepsidae), Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šulc K. (1928). Biologicky vyznam vyzbroje prednich samcich nohou u sepsid (Muscidae). Biol. Spisy Vysoke Skoly Zverolekarske Brno. 7: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Sauer, K. P. (1991). The notal organ of the scorpionfly (Panorpa vulgaris): An adaptation to coerce mating duration. Behav. Ecol. 2: 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toro, H., and de la Hoz, E. (1976). Factores mecánicos en la aislación reproductive de Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Arg. 35: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. I. (1983). The effects of size on the mating behaviour of the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. I., Hemmi, H., and Roösli, T. (1992). Sexual conflict in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Funct. Ecol. 6: 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, F. (1993).Innerartliche Grössenvariabilität und Paarungsverhalten bei Sepsis punctum (Fabricius, 1794) [Diptera, Sepsidae], Diplomarbeit, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Wüurzburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William G. Eberhard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eberhard, W.G. Physical Restraint or Stimulation? The Function(s) of the Modified Front Legs of Male Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera, Sepsidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 15, 831–850 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161915227

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161915227

Navigation