Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spike-Based Synaptic Plasticity and the Emergence of Direction Selective Simple Cells: Simulation Results

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direction selectivity (DS) of simple cells in the primary visual cortex was recently suggested to arise from short-term synaptic depression in thalamocortical afferents (Chance F, Nelson S, Abbott L (1998), J. Neuroscience 18(12): 4785–4799). In the model, two groups of afferents with spatially displaced receptive fields project through either depressing and non-depressing synapses onto the V1 cell. The degree of synaptic depression determines the temporal phase advance of the response to drifting gratings. We show that the spatial displacement and the appropriate degree of synaptic depression required for DS can develop within an unbiased input scenario by means of temporally asymmetric spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) which modifies both the synaptic strength and the degree of synaptic depression. Moving stimuli of random velocities and directions break any initial receptive field symmetry and produce DS. Frequency tuning curves and subthreshold membrane potentials akin to those measured for non-directional simple cells are thereby changed into those measured for directional cells. If STDP is such that down-regulation dominates up-regulation the overall synaptic strength adapts in a self-organizing way such that eventually the postsynaptic response for the non-preferred direction becomes subthreshold. To prevent unlearning of the acquired DS by randomly changing stimulus directions an additional learning threshold is necessary. To further protect the development of the simple cell properties against noise in the stimulus, asynchronous and irregular synaptic inputs are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson E, Bergen J (1985) Spatio-temporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2: 284–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed B, Anderson J, Douglas R, Martin K, Nelson J (1994) Polyneuronal innervation of spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 341(1): 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albus K, Wolf W (1984) Early post-natal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex:Alaminar analysis. J. Physiol. 348: 153–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi G, Poo M (1998) Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neuroscience 18(24): 10464–10472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienenstock E, Cooper L, Munro P (1982) Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specifity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neuroscience 2(1): 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais B, Cooper L, Shouval H (2000) Formation of direction selectivity in natural scene environments. Neural Computation 12(3): 1057–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends in Neurosci. 12(8): 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchs N, Senn W(1999) Learning direction selectivity through adaptation of the probability of the vesicle release probability. In: Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts, No. 898.15.

  • Buchs N, Senn W (2001) Learning direction selectivity through spike-timing dependent modification of neurotransmitter release probability. Neurocomputing 38-40: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carandini M, Ferster D (2000) Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 20(1): 470–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carandini M, Heeger D, Senn W (2001) Thalamocortical synaptic depression and the responsiveness of the primary visual cortex. Neuron, submitted.

  • Chance F, Nelson S, Abbott L (1998) Synaptic depression and the temporal response characteristics of V1 cells. J. Neuroscience 18(12): 4785–4799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremieux J, Orban G, Duysens J, Amblard B (1987) Response properties of area 17 neurons in cats reared in stroboscobic illumination. J. Neuroscience 57: 1511–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djupsund K, Hayden B, Ham T, Dan Y (2001) Stimulus-timing dependent plasticity of intracortical connectivity in adult V1. In: Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts, No. 619.26.

  • Durand S, Freeman T, Mante V, Kiper D, Carandini M(2001) Crossorientation suppression in cat V1 with very fast stimuli. In: Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts.

  • Feidler J, Saul A, Murthy A, Humphrey A (1997) Hebbian learning and the development of direction selectivity: The role of geniculate response timing. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 8: 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman D (2000) Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. Neuron 27: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman T, Durand S, Kiper D, Carandini M (2001) Crossorientation suppression in V1 following cortical adaptation. In: Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts.

  • Fusi S, Annunziato M, Badoni D, Salamon A, Amit DJ (2000) Spikedriven synaptic plasticity: Theory, simulation, VLSI implementation. Neural Computation 12: 2227–2258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Fu Y-X, Shen K, Dan Y (2001) Spatial plasticity of receptive fields in the cat primary visual cortex. In: Society for Neuroscience, Abstracts, No. 821.62.

  • Geinisman Y, Berry R, Disterhoft J, Power J, Van der Zee E (2001) Associative learning elicits the formation of multiple-synapse boutons. J. Neuroscience 21(15): 5568–5573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken M, Shapley R, Grosof D (1996) Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 13: 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeger D (1993) Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized half-squared, linear operators. J. Neurophysiol. 70(5): 1885–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel D, Wiesel T (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (London) 160: 106–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel D, Wiesel T (1963) Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 26: 994–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey A, Saul A (1998) Strobe rearing reduces direction selectivity in area 17 by altering spatiotemporal receptive-field structure. J. Neuroscience 80: 2991–3004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey A, Saul A, Feidler J (1998) Strobe rearing prevents the convergence of inputs with different response timings onto area 17 simple cells. J. Neuroscience 80: 3005–3020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagadeesh B, Wheat H, Ferster D (1993) Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. Science 262: 1901–1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagadeesh B, Wheat H, Kontsevich L, Ferster D (1997) Direction selectivity of synaptic potentials in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2772–2789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempter R, Gerstner W, van Hemmen J (1999) Spike-based compared to rate-based Hebbian learning. In: MS Kearns, SA Solla, DA Cohn, eds.,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 11, pp. 125–131.

  • Lendvai B, Stern E, Chen A, Svoboda K (2000) Experiencedependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nature 404: 876–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maex R, Orban G(1996) Model circuit of spiking neurons generating directional selectivity in simple cells. J. Neurophysiol. 75: 1515–1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by concidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275: 213–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markram H, Pikus D, Gupta A, Tsodyks M (1998) Potential for multiple mechanisms, phenomena and algorithms for synaptic plasticity at single synapses. Neuropharmacology 37: 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markram H, Tsodyks M (1996) Redistribution of synaptic effi-cacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nature 382: 807–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta M (2000) From hippocampus to V1: Effect of LTP on spatio-temporal dynamics of receptive fields. In: J Bower, ed., Trends in Neuroscience, Proceedings of the CNS'99. pp. 905–911.

  • Meister M, Lagnado L, Baylor D (1995) Concerted signaling by retinal ganglion cells. Science 270: 1207–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister M, Wong R, Baylor D, Shatz C (1991) Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. Science 252(5008): 939–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagano T, Fujiwara M (1979) A neural network model for the development of direction selectivity in the visual cortex. Biol. Cybernetics 32(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman R (1985) Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 54: 651–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orban G, Gulyas B, Spileers W, Maes H (1987) Responses of cat striate neurons to moving light and dark bars: Changes with excentricities. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8): 1653–1665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak T, Schumer R, Grizzi M, Movshon J (1985) Abolition of visual cortical direction selectivity affects visual behavior in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 61: 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao R, Sejnowski T (2000) Predictive sequence learning in recurrent neocortical networks. In: S Solla, T Leen, K-R Muller, ed., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12. MIT Press, pp. 164–170.

  • Reid R, Soodak R, Shapley R (1987) Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84(23): 8740–8744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Soodak R, Shapley R (1991) Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 66(2): 505–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Victor J, Shapley R (1992) Broadband temporal stimuli decrease the integration time of neurons in cat striate cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 9: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul A, Feidler J (2002) Development of response timing and direction selectivity in cat visual thalamus and cortex. J. Neuroscience 22: 2945–2955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul A, Humphrey A (1992a) Evidence of input from lagged cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus to simple cells in cortical area 17 of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 68: 1190–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul A, Humphrey A (1992b) Temporal frequency tuning of direction selectivity in cat visual cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 8: 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn W, Buchs N (2002) Spike-based synaptic plasticity and the emergence of direction selective simple cells: Mathematical analysis. J. Computational Neuroscience 13: 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn W, Tsodyks M, Markram H (2001) An algorithm for modifying neurotransmitter release probability based on preand post-synaptic spike timing. Neural Computation 13(1): 35–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley R (1996) Linearity and non-linearity in cortical receptive field. Ciba. Found. Symp. 184: 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Softky W, Koch C (1993) The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J. Neuroscience 13(1): 334–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Miller K, Abbott L (2000) Competitive hebbian learning through spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 3: 919–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soodak R, Shapley R, Kaplan E (1991) Fine structure of receptive-field centers of X and Y cells of the cat. Vis. Neurosci. 6: 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratford K, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Martin K, Baninster N, Jack J (1996) Excitatory synaptic inputs to spiny stellate cells in cat visual cortex. Nature 382: 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez H, Koch C, Douglas R (1995) Modeling direction selectivity of simple cells in striate visual cortex within the framework of the canonical microcircuit. J. Neuroscience 15(10): 6700–6719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sur M, Leamey C(2001) Development and plasticity of cortical areas and networks. Nat. Rev. Neuroscience 2: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsodyks M, Markram H (1997) The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A, Ahumada A (1985) Model of human visual-motion sensing. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2: 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbauer S, Wenisch O, van Hemmen J, Miller K (1997) Development of spatiotemporal receptive fields of simple cells: II. Simulation and analysis. Biol. Cybernetics 77(6): 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Dan Y(2001) Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in cortical processing of orientation. Neuron 32: 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Tao H, Holt C, Harris W, Poo M (1998) A critical window in the cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature 395: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physiological Institute, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, CH-3012, Bern

    N.J. Buchs & W. Senn

Authors
  1. N.J. Buchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Senn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchs, N., Senn, W. Spike-Based Synaptic Plasticity and the Emergence of Direction Selective Simple Cells: Simulation Results. J Comput Neurosci 13, 167–186 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020210230751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020210230751

Search

Navigation