Skip to main content
Log in

Climate change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Tolerable Windows Approach (TWA) to Integrated Assessments (IA) of global warming is based on external normative specifications of tolerable sets of climate impacts as well as proposed emission quotas and policy instruments for implementation. In a subsequent step, the complete set of admissible climate protection strategies which are compatible with these normative inputs is determined by scientific analysis. In doing so, minimum requirements concerning global and national greenhouse gas emission paths can be determined. In this paper we present the basic methodological elements of TWA, discuss its relation to more conventional approaches to IA like cost–benefit analyses, and present some preliminary results obtained by a reduced-form climate model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Alcamo, Preliminary results of an international comparison of computed emission corridors, Paper presented at the 5th International Workshop on Using the IMAGE Model to Support Climate Negotiations, Delft, the Netherlands, 5–6 June 1997.

  2. J. Alcamo and E. Kreileman, Emission scenarios and global climate protection, Global Environmental Change 6 (1996) 305–334.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Alcamo, R. Swart, J. Onigkeit, M. Berk and E. Kreileman, Climate protocols and climate protection: An evaluation of proposals leading up to Kyoto, Background Report for the German and Dutch Delegations to the 3rd Session of the Conference of Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto, 1–10 December 1997 (Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Germany, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Aubin, Viability Theory (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Aubin and A. Cellina, Differential Inclusions (Springer, Berlin, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Baarse, Development of an operational tool for global vulnerability assessment, Update of the number of people at risk due to sea level rise and increased flooding probability, CZM-Centre Publication No. 3, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, the Hague, the Netherlands (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.K. Dasgupta and D.W. Pearce, Cost-Benefit Analysis — Theory and Practice (MacMillan, London, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Deimling, Multivalued Differential Equations, De Gruyter Ser. Nonlinear Anal. Appl., Vol. 1 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Dowlatabadi, Climate change thresholds and guardrails for emissions, Climatic Change 41 (1999) 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Science for the post-normal age, Futures (September 1993) 739–755.

  11. K. Hasselmann, R. Sausen, E. Maier-Reimer and R. Voss, On the cold start problem in transient simulations with coupled atmosphere-ocean models, Climate Dynamics 9 (1993) 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Helm, T. Bruckner and F.L. Tóth, Value judgements and the choice of climate protection strategies, International Journal of Social Economics 26 (1999) 974–998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 1992. The supplementary to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 1995 — Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 1995 — Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 1995 — Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), An introduction to simple climate models used in the IPCC Second Assessment Report, IPCC Technical Paper II (1997).

  18. A. Kurzhanski and I. Vályi, Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation and Control (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.J. Lempert, Book review, Climatic Change 41 (1999) 635–640.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Manne and R. Richels, On stabilizing CO2 concentrations — cost-effective emission reduction strategies, Paper presented at the IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, 10–12 March 1997.

  21. Y. Matsuoka, T. Morita and Y. Kawashima, An estimation of a negotiable safe emissions corridor based on the AIM model, preliminary study, Discussion paper prepared for the 2nd Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, 8–19 July 1996.

  22. R.S. Melnick, The politics of benefit-cost analysis, in: Valuing Health Risks, Costs, and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making, eds. P.B. Hammond and R. Coppock (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.G. Morgan, M. Kandlikar, J. Risbey and H. Dowlatabadi, Why conventional tools for policy analysis are often inadequate for problems og global change, Climatic Change 41 (1999) 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.-D. Nagel, G. Smiatek and B. Werner, Das Konzept der kritischen Eintragsraten als Möglichkeit zur Bestimmung von Umweltbelastungs-und qualitätskriterien [Critical Loads and Critical Levels], Materialien zur Umweltforschung herausgegeben vom Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen (Metzeler-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 1994) (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Nilsson, ed., Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen, Report from a Nordic Working Group, National Swedish Environment Protection Board, Solna (1986).

  26. J. Nilsson and P. Grennfelt, Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen, Miljørapport 1988:15, Nordic Council of Ministries, Copenhagen, Denmark (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.D. Nordhaus, Discounting in economics and climate change, Climatic Change 37 (1997) 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T.J. Osborn and T.M.L. Wigley, A simple model for estimating methane concentration and lifetime variations, Climate Dynamics 9 (1994) 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.I. Panasyuk, Equations of attainable set dynamics, Part 2: Partial differential equations, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 64 (1990) 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Papageorgiou, Optimierung (Oldenbourg Verlag, München, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Petschel-Held, H.-J. Schellnhuber, T. Bruckner, F.L. Tóth and K. Hasselmann, The tolerable windows approach: theoretical and methodological foundations, Climatic Change 41 (1999) 303–331.

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. Pitcher (Battelle Northwest Laboratories, USA), personal communication.

  33. E. Polak, Optimization — Algorithms and Consistent Approximations (Springer, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Rahmstorf, Bifurcation of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to changes in the hydrological cycle, Nature 378 (1995) 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Rahmstorf, Risk of sea-change in the Atlantic, Nature 388 (1997) 825–826.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Railton, Benefit-cost analysis as a source of information about welfare, in: Valuing Health Risks, Costs, and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making, eds. P.B. Hammond and R. Coppock (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Russell, The making of cruel choices, in: Valuing Health Risks, Costs, and Benefits for Environmental Decision Making, eds. P.B. Hammond and R. Coppock (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  38. H.-J. Schellnhuber and J. Kropp, Geocybernetics — Controlling a complex dynamical system under uncertainty, Naturwissenschaften 85 (1998) 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  39. H.-J. Schellnhuber and G. Yohe, Comprehending the economic and social dimensions of climate change by integrated assessment, in: Proc. of the WCRP Conference, Geneva, 26–28 August 1997.

  40. K.P. Shine, R.G. Derwent, D.J. Wuebbles and J.-J. Morcrette, Radiative forcing of climate, in: Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment, ed. IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. J.P. van der Sluijs, Integrated assessment models and the management of uncertainty, Working Paper 96–119, IIASA, Laxenburg (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Th.F. Stocker and A. Schmittner, Influence of CO2 emission rates on the stability of the thermohaline circulation, Nature 388 (1997) 862–865.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Y. Svirezhev, Model description and basic equations, in: Toys: Materials to the Brandenburg Biosphere Model/Gaia, ed. Y. Svirezhev, PIK Report 14 (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, 1996) pp. 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Y. Svirezhev, V. Brovkin, W. von Bloh, H.-J. Schellnhuber and G. Petschel-Held, Optimization of reduction of global CO2 emission based on a simple model of the carbon cycle, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4 (1999) 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. Swart, M. Berk, E. Kreileman, M. Janssen, J. Bollen, R. Leemans and B. de Vries, The safe landing approach: risks and trade-off in climate change, Paper presented at a special session at the occasion of the 2nd Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate, Geneva, 12 July 1996 (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  46. F.L. Tóth, Applicability of techniques of cost-benefit analysis to climate change: A commentary, in: The Economics of Climate Change, ed. W.D. Nordhaus (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  47. F.L. Tóth, T. Bruckner, H.-M. Füssel, M. Leimbach, G. Petschel-Held and H.-J. Schellnhuber, The tolerable windows approach to integrated assessments, in: Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) — Bridging the Gaps, ed. IPCC, Proc. of the IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, 10–12 March 1997, CGER Report No. I029-'97 (1997) pp. 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  48. F.L. Tóth, M. Leimbach, T. Bruckner and G. Petschel-Held, Tolerable climate windows and emission corridors: New results with the ICLIPS model, in: Energy Models for Decision Support — New Challenges and Possible Solutions, eds. E. Laege and P. Schaumann (Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, Stuttgart, 1998) pp. 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  49. F.L. Tóth, G. Petschel-Held and T. Bruckner, Climate change and integrated assessment: The tolerable windows approach, in: Proceedings of the EU-Advanced Study Course on Goals and Instruments for the Achievement of Global Warming Mitigation in Europe, ed. J. Hacker (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999) pp. 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  50. R.A. Warrick and J. Oerlemans, Sea level rise, in: Climate Change — The IPCC Scientific Assessment, ed. IPCC (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990) pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  51. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change), Scenario for the derivation of global CO2 reduction targets and implementation strategies, Statement on the occasion of the 1st Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Berlin, Bremerhaven, 1995.

  52. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change), World in Transition; Ways Towards Global Environmental Solutions (Springer, Berlin, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  53. T.M.L. Wigley, Future CFC concentrations under the Montreal Protocol and their greenhouse-effect implications, Nature 335 (1988) 333–335.

    Google Scholar 

  54. T.M.L. Wigley, MAGICC (Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse-Gas Induced Climate Change): User's Guide and Scientific Reference Manual (National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  55. T.M.L. Wigley and S.C.B. Raper, Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios, Nature 357 (1992) 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  56. T.M.L. Wigley and S.C.B. Raper, Future changes in global mean temperature and sea level, in: Climate and Sea Level Change: Observations, Projections and Implications, eds. R.A. Warrick, E.M. Barrow and T.M.L. Wigley (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993) pp. 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  57. T.M.L. Wigley, S.C.B. Raper and M. Salmon, Source code of the MAGICC model (as used in MiniCam, version 2.0), Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  58. T.M.L. Wigley, R. Richels and J. Edmonds, Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Nature 379 (1996) 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  59. G.W. Yohe, Uncertainty, short term hedging and the tolerable window approach, Global Environmental Change 7 (1997) 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  60. G.W. Yohe, The tolerable windows approach: lessons and limitations, Climatic Change 41 (1999) 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  61. G.W. Yohe and F. Tóth, Adaptation and the guardrail approach to tolerable climate change policy, Climatic Change (1999), forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Tóth, F. et al. Climate change decision-support and the tolerable windows approach. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 4, 217–234 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019076603956

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019076603956

Navigation