Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The genesis, classification, and mapping of soils in urban areas

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the concept of soil in both urban and rural environments, and along the urban-rural land use gradient, to illustrate the obvious need to increase our understanding of urban soils. Spatial variability of the urban landscape is illustrated with "Soil series - Urban land complexes" from Baltimore County, Maryland. The World Reference Base for Soil Resources (ISSS-ISRIC-FAO, 1994) proposed Anthrosol and Regosol major soil groups are discussed to show modern approaches to soil classification and to illustrate how the classification of urban soils is essentially undeveloped. Models of soil genesis help identify the processes and functions of the soil system. A conceptual model using Jenny's (1941) state factor approach for human impact on soil formation details the "anthroposequence." The benchmark anthroposequence model may be applied to studying soil systems along urban-rural land use gradients. The process of "anthropedogenesis" is supported to quantify the role of human activity in changing the "natural" direction of soil formation. Future directions of soil research in the urban landscape should involve large scale soil mapping (e.g. 1:6000), benchmark anthroposequences, improved soil classification, and refined characterization of the role of human activities in soil formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Amundson, R. and Jenny, H. (1991) The place of humans in the state factor theory of ecosystems and their soils. Soil Sci. 151, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. W. (1983) Concepts of soils and pedology. In Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy I.Concepts and interactions (L. P. Wilding, N. E. Smeck and G. F. Hall, eds.), pp. 1–22. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, D. W. and Hole, F. D. (1965) Man as a factor of soil formation. Soil Sci. 99, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockheim, J. G. (1974) Nature and properties of highly-disturbed urban soils, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Paper presented before Division S-5, Soil Genesis, Morphology and Classification, Annual Meeting of the Soil Science Society of America, Chicago, IL.

  • Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. (1996) The nature and properties of soils. 11th ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, P. and Gregory, P. J. (1991) Soils: a neglected resource in urban areas. In Soils in the urban environment (P. Bullock and P. J. Gregory, eds.), pp. 1–5. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craul, P. J. (1992) Urban soil in landscape design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., Holm, R. W. and Brown, I. (1976) Biology and society. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, D. S. and Fanning, M. C. B. (1989) Soil morphology, genesis, and classification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, D. S., Stein, C. E. and Patterson, J. C. (1978) Theories of genesis and classification of highly man-influenced soils. In Abstracts of commission papers, Vol.1, 11th congress of the international society of soil science, p. 283. Edmonton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (1988) Soil map of the world: revised legend. World Soil Resources Report 60, Final Draft, FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, J. M. (1991) The classification of soils in urban areas. In Soils in the urban environment (P. Bullock and P. Gregory, eds.), pp. 5–27. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett, R. J. (1975) Soil landscape systems: a model of soil genesis. Geoderma 13, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Soil Science Society (ISSS)-International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC)-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1994) World reference base for soil resources-draft ( O. C. Spaargaren, ed.), Wageningen/Rome.

  • Jenny, H. (1941) Factors of soil formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, H. (1980) The soil resource: origin and behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosse, A. (1990) Diagnostic horizons in Anthrosols. In Reports on the international conference on soil classification, 12-16 September, 1988, Alma-Ata, USSR (B. G. Rozanov, ed.), pp. 264–273. Centre for International Projects, USSR State Committee for Environmental Protection, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1990) The study of ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71, 1232–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat, R. V. (1991) The urban-rural gradient: an opportunity to better understand human influences on forest soils. In Proceedings of the society of american foresters, 1990 annual convention, Washington DC, pp. 212–218. July 27–Aug. 1, 1990. Soc. of Am. Foresters, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat, R. V., McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1995) Soil characteristics of oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. J.Environ.Qual. 24, 516–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reybold, W. U. and Matthews, E. D. (1976) Soil survey of Baltimore County, Maryland. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, E. C. A. (1973) Soil development sequences and energy models. Soil Sci. 115, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. R., Fanning, D. S., Foss, J. E. and Patterson, J. C. (1986a) Soils of the Mall in Washington, DC: I. Statistical summary of properties. Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J. 50, 699–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. R., Fanning, D. S., Foss, J. E. and Patterson, J.C. (1986b) Soils of the Mall in Washington, DC: II. Genesis, classification and mapping. Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J. 50, 705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, R. W. (1959) Outline of a generalized theory of soil genesis. Soil Sci.Soc.Am.Proc. 23, 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeck, N. E., Runge, E. C. A. and Mackintosh E.E. (1983) Dynamics and genetic modelling of soil systems. In Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy I.Concepts and interactions (L. P. Wilding, N. E. Smeck and G. F. Hall, eds.), pp. 51–81. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. (1975) Soil Taxonomy – a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook 436, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, B., Mayer, R. and Khann, P. K. (1980) Chemical changes due to acid deposition in a loess-derived soil in Central Europe. Soil Sci. 130, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/NRCS (1994) State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base – data use information. National Soil Survey Center Miscellaneous Publication No. 1492, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA/NRCS (1996) Figure 1 data downloaded from the State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base. http:// www.ncg.nrcs.usda.gov/statsgoIftp.html

  • Wilding, L. P. and Drees, L. R. (1983) Spatial variability and pedology. In Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy I.Concepts and interactions (L P. Wilding, N. E. Smeck and G. F. Hall, eds.), pp. 83–116. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaalon, O. H. and Yaron, B. (1966) Framework for manmade soil changes: outline of metapedogenesis. Soil Sci. 102, 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Effland, W.R., Pouyat, R.V. The genesis, classification, and mapping of soils in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1, 217–228 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018535813797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018535813797