Skip to main content
Log in

Yield and stability factors associated with hybrid wheat

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For hybrid wheat to be accepted in the Great Plains of the USA, hybrids must exhibit enhanced yield performance, yield responsiveness, and reasonable yield stability across a wide array of production environments. Agripro has been researching hybrid wheat since 1981 and has an established pureline release history since 1978. Yield data from 1991 to 1995 were examined to compare the trend performance and selection gains of purelines and hybrids in a large scale parallel development effort. This data set (13,739 points) reveals an average 0.454 t ha-1 or 10.8% hybrid yield advantage over purelines in preliminary regional testing. Entries selected from the preliminary trials show a greater hybrid advantage of 0.652 t ha-1, or 13.5%. Several factors including enhanced stability over strong yearly environmental effects, improved agronomic and epidemiological expression through complementary inbred trait selection, and improved heat tolerance are likely contributors to this significantly improved selection gain. Yield stability of hybrids and purelines was compared in Agripro Standard Variety Trials and USDA-ARS Southern Regional Performance Nurseries from 1990 to 1995. In addition to having higher means than purelines, hybrid yield advantage increased with improving production conditions. The enhanced responsiveness of hybrids, as indicated by higher slopes in regression analyses, was combined with similar deviations from regression response. Hybrid wheat in the Great Plains of the USA has shown a fundamental yield, responsiveness and selection gain advantage over pureline varieties that could result in acceptance by producers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carver, B.F., E.L. Smith & H.O. England, Jr., 1987. Regression and cluster analysis of environmental responses of hybrid and pureline winter wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 27: 659–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Agronomy J 6: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, J.J., 1995. A new look at hybrid wheat and its role in improving yield and quality. In: C.J. Peterson (Ed.), Proceedings of the North American Wheat Workers Workshop, 1994, pp. 20–34. National Wheat Improvement Committee. Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1982. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meeteren, N.D, 1995. Hybrid and pureline response to high temperature stress at two growth stages in hard red winter wheat. Agronomy Abstracts 87: 80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruns, R., Peterson, C.J. Yield and stability factors associated with hybrid wheat. Euphytica 100, 1–5 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018364801101

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018364801101

Keywords

Navigation