Skip to main content
Log in

The θ projection method and small creep strain interpolations in a commercial Titanium alloy

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper describes the early and final uniaxial creep behaviour of a Titanium alloy used for manufacturing intermediate power compressor disks and blades. Tests were conducted at the operating temperature (773 K) for such components and for rupture lives up to 3600 hours. Creep curves were fitted using either the conventional 4Θ model or the recently developed 6θ equation. Parameters allowing the interpolation of times to small strains were produced and their accuracy checked against experimental values using distributions found to be most supported by the data. At strains above 0.75% both methods yielded zero mean interpolation errors. At strains above 0.27% and below 0.75% the 4Θ equation produced systematic errors in interpolation but the 6θ function gave errors which were not statistically different from zero. For strains below 0.27% both techniques produced systematic interpolation errors but the 6θ interpolations were always significantly better than their 4Θ counterparts. Both the 6θ and 4Θ techniques produced systematic errors when predicting the failure time using interpolated rupture strains. Unlike the 4Θ function, the 6θ equation produced unbiased predictions of the minimum creep rate and so produced failure time interpolations from the Monkman–Grant relation that were indistinguishable from zero.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. H. Morton, Rosenhain Centenary Conference (The Royal Society, 1975).

  2. A. Greasley, Materials Science and Technology 13 (1997) 31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. W. Evans and B. Wilshre, in “Creep of Metals and Alloys” (The Institute of Materials, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Evans, The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, forthcoming.

  5. Idem., J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 2937.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. W. Evans, Mater. Sci. Technol. 16 (2000) 6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. K. Penny and D. L. Marriott, in “Design for Creep” (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995) Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Evans, J. Mater. Sci. 16 (2000).

  9. R. W. Bailey, in Proc. I. Mech. E. 131 (1935).

  10. F. Garofalo, in “Fundamentals of Creep and Creep Rupture in Metals” (McMillan, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. Evans, Mater. Sci. Technol. 5 (1989) 699.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. W. Evans and P. J. Scharning, Materials Science and Technology 17 (2001) 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. C. Monkman and N. J. Grant, in Proc. ASTM 56 (1956) 593.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Prentice, Biometrika 61 (1974) 539.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. F. Lawless, in “Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data” (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982) Appendix B.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. H. Greene, in “Econometric Analysis” (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000) p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Evans, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 54 (1995) 171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, M. The θ projection method and small creep strain interpolations in a commercial Titanium alloy. Journal of Materials Science 36, 2875–2884 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017946218860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017946218860

Keywords

Navigation