Skip to main content
Log in

Observation of different photo-degradation behaviour in two similar polypropylenes

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photodegradation properties of injection moulded bars 3 mm thick made from two nominally similar toughened polypropylene compounds (PP and MPP) have been found to differ remarkably in some aspects. In both of them the plot of the mass average molecular mass (M w) versus distance from the exposed surface displayed a steep sigmoidal shape with very low values near the surface and values close to the undegraded value near the bar centre. With PP the steepest part of the M w versus depth plot remained at almost the same position irrespective of exposure time for tests carried out for periods up to 64 weeks whereas with MPP the steepest part of the plot shifted progressively in from the exposed surface as exposure increased. The tensile strength fell rapidly with exposure time in both PP and MPP but with PP partial recovery was observed whereas with MPP the fall in strength appeared to be monotonic with exposure time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. J. Chirinos-PadrÓn, P. H. HernÁndez, N. S. Allen, C. Vasilou, G. P. Marshall and M. De Poortere, Polym.Degrad.Stab.19 (1987) 177.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. FÖldes, M. Iring and F. TÜdŐs, Polym.Bull. 18 (1987) 525

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Geetha, A. Torikai, S. Nagaya and K. Fueki, Polym.Degrad.Stab.19 (1987) 279.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. J. Turton, Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1999.

  5. T. J. Turton and J. R. White,Polym.Degrad.Stab., in press.

  6. B. O'Donnell and J. R. White, Polym.Degrad.Stab.44 (1994) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Idem., J.Mater.Sci.29 (1994) 3955.

  8. P. Brennan and C. Fedor, 43rd Ann.Conf.Composites Inst., SPI, Session 23-A (1988) p.1.

  9. B. O'Donnell, J. R. White and S. R. Holding, J.Appl.Polym.Sci.52 (1994) 1607.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. G. Treuting and W. T. Read Jr,J.Appl.Phys.22 (1951) 130.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. R. White, Polymer Testing 4 (1984) 165. Also appeared as Chapter 8 in “Measurement Techniques for Polymeric Solids,” edited by R. P. Brown and B. E. Read (Elsevier Appl. Sci. Publs., Barking, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Davis and D. Sims, “Weathering of Polymers” (Appl. Sci. Publs., London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. C. Furneaux, K. J. Ledbury and A. Davis,Polym. Degrad.Stab.3 (1980–1) 431.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Audouin, V. Langlois, J. Verdu and J. C. M. De Bruijn, J.Mater.Sci.29 (1994) 569.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. White and A. Turnbull, ibid. 29 (1994) 584.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. S. Rabello and J. R. White, Plast.Rubb.Compos., Proc.Applics.25 (1998) 237.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Idem., Polym.Degrad.Stab.56 (1997) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Idem.,J.Appl.Polym.Sci.64 (1997) 2505.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. White, Plast.Rubb.Compos., Proc.Applics. 27 (1998) 124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turton, T.J., White, J.R. Observation of different photo-degradation behaviour in two similar polypropylenes. Journal of Materials Science 36, 4617–4624 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017937929149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017937929149

Keywords

Navigation