Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic policies of admission to a two-class system based on customer offers

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

We consider the problem of dynamic admission control in a Markovian loss queueing system with two classes of jobs with different service rates and random revenues. We establish the existence of an optimal monotone policy. We also show that under certain conditions there exist preferred jobs from either class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, E., Jiménez, T. and Koole, G.M. (1998) On optimal call admission control. Technical report WS-503, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrizosa, E., Conde, E. and Munoz-Marquez, M. (1998) Admission policies in loss queueing models with heterogeneous arrivals.Management Science, 44, 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoneim, H.A. and Stidham, S. (1985) Control of arrivals to two queues in series. European Journal of Operational Research, 21, 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Lerma, O. and Lasserre, J.B. (1999) Further Topics on Discrete-Time Markov Control Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilson, J. (1970) A simple algorithm for contract acceptance. Opsearch, 7, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, C. and Jordan, S. (1997) Access control to two multiserver loss queues in series. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 1017–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. (1975) Applying a new device in the optimization of exponential queueing systems. Operations Research, 23, 687–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. and Ross, S.M. (1971) The streetwalker's dilemma: a job shop model. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 20, 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. and Stidham, S.M. (1977) Individual versus social optimization in exponential congestion system. Operations Research, 25, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. (1971) A queuing reward system with several customer classes. Management Science, 16, 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.L. and Buckman, A.G. (1987) Cost allocation and opportunity costs. Management Science, 33, 626–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naor, P. (1969) On the regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica, 37, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Örmeci, E.L. and Burnetas, A. (1999) Admission policies for a two class loss system with batch arrivals. EURANDOM technical report 99-052, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Örmeci, E.L., Burnetas, A. and Van der Wal, J. (1999) Admission policies for a two class loss system. EURANDOM technical report 99-050, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puterman, M. (1994) Markov Decision Processes, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Righter, R. (1994) Scheduling, in Stochastic Orders and their Applications, Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (eds), Academic Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K.W. (1995) Multiservice Loss Models for Broadband Telecommunication Networks, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walrand, J. (1988) Introduction to Queueing Networks, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S.H. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (1993) Optimal expulsion control-a dual approach to admission control of an ordered-entry system.Operations Research, 41, 1137–1152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Örmeci, E.L., Burnetas, A.N. & Emmons, H. Dynamic policies of admission to a two-class system based on customer offers. IIE Transactions 34, 813–822 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015552906175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015552906175

Keywords

Navigation