Abstract
The project of naturalising phenomenology is examined within the larger context of the philosophy of science. Transcendental phenomenology, as defended by Husserl, in opposition to the naturalistic enterprise, reflects a particular way of thinking about philosophy and its relationship to the empirical sciences that stands as an obstacle to the project of naturalisation. This paper develops a critique of a basic assumption made in this conception of philosophy, namely that it is possible to ask and answer questions concerning knowledge in the abstract, prior to and independently of the various investigative contexts which are the immediate concern of practicing scientists. To successfully naturalise phenomenology, we need to abandon this conception of philosophy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachelard, G. 1984. The New Scientific Sprit, trans. A. Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press.
Bachelard, G. 1968. The Philosophy of No: A Philosophy of the New Scientific Mind. NewYork: Orion Press.
Brucker, J. J. 1742-1744. Historia critica philosophiae, 5 vols. Leipzig.
Cartwright, N. et al. 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gellner, E. 1979. Words and Things. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Harrington, A. 1996. Reenchanted Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1982. The Logic of Hegel, trans. W. Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heidegger, M. 1927. Sein und Zeit/Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
Husserl, E. 1900-01. Logische Untersuchengen/Logical Investigations, trans. J.N.Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
Mandelbaum, M. 1976. On the historiography of philosophy. Philosophy Research Archives 2: A2-C12.
Merleau Ponty, M. 1945. Phenomenologie de la perception/The Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge, 1962.
Nielsen, K. 1991. After the Demise of the Tradition: Rorty, Critical Theory, and the Fate of Philosophy. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.
Petitot, J., Varela, F.J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J.-M. 1999. Naturalising Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ramachandran, V.S. and Blakeslee, S. 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. London: Fourth Estate.
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roy, J.-M., Petitot, J., Pachoud, B. and Varela, F.J. 1999. Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In: J. Petitot et al. (eds). Naturalising Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, pp. 1-80. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Serres, M. and Latour, B. 1995. Conversations on Science, Culture and Time, trans. R. Lapidus. Ann Arbor: University Of Michigan Press.
Stack, G.J. 1983. Lange and Nietzsche. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Tenneman, G.W. 1798-1819. Geschichte der Philosophie, 11 vols. Leipzig.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, A. Philosophy and the ‘anteriority complex’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1, 27–47 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520602346
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520602346