Skip to main content
Log in

Advancing the debate on a world environment organization

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the beginning of the new millennium, the longstanding need for reform of the United Nations system has gained new momentum. Efficiency gains and better coordination are desirable, though not sufficient to bring about improvement in international relations. There is need, therefore, to look for institutional innovations that would upgrade the pressing tasks of environmental and development policy in the eyes of national governments, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations, improve the institutional setting for the negotiation and implementation of new agreements and action programs, and strengthen the action capacity of the developing countries on these matters. The present article points to and elaborates on the need for a “World Environment and Development Organization” within the United Nations system, and outlines the shape it might be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, A. and Narain, S. (1991) Global Warming in an Unequal World. A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Dehli: Centre for Science and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agenda 21 (1992) Agenda 21. Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H.K. and Salamon, L.M. (1998) The Nonprofit Sector in the Developing World. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick, R.E. (1998) Ozone Diplomacy. New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, 2nd enlarged edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, V. and Glyn, A. eds. (1995) The North, the South andthe Environment. Ecological Constraints andthe Global Economy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. (1998) Weltumweltpolitik zwischen NordundSüd. Die neue Verhandlungsmacht der Entwicklungsländer. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. and Simonis, U.E. (1998) A World Environment and Development Organization. Functions, Opportunities, Issues, Policy Paper No. 9, Bonn: Development and Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. and Simonis, U.E. (1999) The multilateral ozone fund. A case study on institutional learning. Int. J. Social Economics 26(1–3), 239–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt-Report (1980) North-South. A Programme for Survival (first “Brandt-Report”), (Independent Commission on International Development Issues–North-South Commission). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt-Report (1983) Common Crisis. North-South Cooperation for WorldR ecovery (second “Brandt-Report”), (Independent Commission on International Development Issues–North-South Commission). London: Pan Books.

  • Brenton, T. (1994) The Greening of Machiavelli. The Evolution of International Environmental Politics. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. et al. (2000) State of the World 2000. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Weiss, E. (1989) In Fairness to Future Generations. International Law, Common Patrimony, andIntergenerational Equity. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirac, J. (1998) Speech by President Jacques Chirac, at the Congress ofthe World Conservation Union. 3 November, Fontainebleau.

  • Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Global Neighbourhood. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDP (Committee for Development Planning) (1989) Elements of an International Development Strategy for the 1990s. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damrosch, L.F. (1987) The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads. New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, W. (1987) The Specialized Agencies and the United Nations. The System in Crisis. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, L. (1998) The Global Politics of the Environment. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D.C. (1994a) Greening the GATT. Trade, Environment and the Future. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D.C. (1994b) The case for a global environmental organization. In Managing the World Economy. Fifty Years after Bretton Woods (P.B. Kenen, ed.), pp. 287–309. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D.C. (1996) Stepping up to the global environmental challenge. Fordham Environmental Law J. 7(1), 103–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedheim, R.L. (1999) Negotiating the New Ocean Regime. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fues, T. (1997) Rio plus 10. The German Contribution to a Global Strategy for Sustainable Development, Policy Paper No. 6, Bonn: Development and Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, T. (1994) Dynamic International Regimes. Institutions for International Environmental Governance. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Advisory Council on Global Change [WBGU] (1996) World in Transition. Ways Towards Global Environmental Solutions. Annual Report 1995, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Advisory Council on Global Change [WBGU] (1999) Worldin Transition. Ways Towards Sustainable Managing of Freshwater Resources. Annual Report 1997, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P.H. ed. (1993) Water in Crisis. A Guide to the World' Fresh Water Resources. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Global Environmental Governance Dialogue (1999) Global Environmental Governance Dialogue. An Invitation. Organizer: Daniel C. Esty.

  • Haas, P.M., Keohane, R.O. and Levy M.A. (eds.) (1993) Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague Declaration (1989) Declaration of the Hague. March 11. Reproduced in International Legal Materials 1308.

  • Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy ofthe commons. Science 162, 1243–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, C. (1996) Transboundary environmental problems and trade rules. Int. J. Social Economics 23(9), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, B.H. and Watson, R.T. (eds.) (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, St. (1989) Duties BeyondBorders. On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Politics. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1996) Climate Change 1995. Economic andSocial Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate Change 2000. Report of Working Group I, Shanghai, January 2001, Working Group II, Geneva 2001.

  • Jänicke, M., Weidner, H. and Jörgens, H. (eds.) (1996) National Environmental Policies. A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Inspection Unit (1995) Strenghthening the United Nations System Capacity for Conflict Prevention (JIU/Rep/95/13), Geneva.

  • Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M.A. (eds.) (1999) Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P.B. (ed.) (1994) Managing the World Economy. Fifty Years after Bretton Woods. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. (1984) After Hegemony. Cooperation andDiscordin the WorldP olitical Economy. Institute for International Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane R.O. and Levy, M. (1996) Institutions for Environmental Aid. Pitfalls andPromise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, H. (1997) Speech by Helmut Kohl, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, at the Special Session of the General Assembly ofthe United Nations, 23 June, New York.

  • Korton, D.C. (1990) Getting to the 21st Century. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. (ed.) (1983) International Regimes. Ithaca, NY, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. (1993) European acid rain: The power oftote-board diplomacy. In The Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions (P.M. Haas, R.O. Keohane and M. Levy, eds.) pp. 75–132.

  • Lyke, J. and Fletcher, S.R. (1992) Deforestation. An Overview of Global Programs andAgreements. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available on-line: http://www.cnie.org/nle/for-4.html (April 19, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.H. (1990) Global Order. Values and Power in International Politics. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M.A.L. (1995) The Third World in Global Environmental Politics. Boulder, CO, London: Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. (1993) Ultimate Security. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1991) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme-Report (1989) A World at Peace. Common Security in the Twenty-First Century (Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues), Stockholm.

  • Palmer, G. (1992) New ways to make international environmental law. Amer. J. Int. Law 86, 259–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione, A. (1999) The Global Demandfor an International Court of the Environment. Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche Intaliane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K. (1997) States, NGOs, and international environmental institutions. Int. Studies Quarterly 41(4), 719–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, M. (1993) The Constitutional crisis in the United Nations. Amer. J. Int. Law (January), 83–100.

  • Rest, A. (1994) Need for an international court for the environment? Environ. Policy Law 24(4), 173–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V. and Mayer, P. (eds.) (1993) Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosbaud, Ch. and Trifterer, O. (eds.) (2000) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. (1992) The UnitedNations in a Turbulent World. Boulder, CO, London: Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. and Czempiel, E.-O. (1992) Governance Without Government. Order andChange in WorldP olitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, R. (1999) Opening Remarks to the High Level Symposium on Trade and the Environment. March 15, www.wto.org/wto/hlms/dgenv.html.

  • Runge, C.F., Ortalo-Magne, F. and Vande Kamp, P. (1994) Free Trade, Protected Environment. Balancing Trade Liberalization andEnvironmental Interests. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (ed.) (1993) Global Ecology. A New Arena of Political Conflict. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, P.H. (1994) Trusts for the Earth. New Financial Mechanisms for International Environmental Protection. Hull: University of Hull Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, P.J. (1999) The environment, community and international law. Harvard Inter. Law J. 30(2), 293–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H.J. and Wenzel, V. (eds.) (1998) Earth System Analysis. Integrating Science for Sustainability. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipulle, H.P. (1997) Das Rio-Paradigma der gemeinsamen aber differenzierten Verantwortung. Entwicklung undZusammenarbeit 38(8), 235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonis, U.E. (ed.) (1999) Weltumweltpolitik. Grundriß und Bausteine eines neuen Politikfeldes, 2nd edition. Berlin: edition sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonis, U.E. (1996) Internationally tradeable emission certificates. Linking environmental protection with economic development. Economics 53, 96–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Centre (1996) For a Strong andDemocratic United Nations. A South Perspective on UN Reform. Geneva.

  • South Commission (1990/1991): The Challenge to the South (“Nyerere Report”). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J.G. (1996) Note Regarding Questions on UN Reform Proposals, unpublished document, dated 4 October 1996.

  • Speth, J.G. (1998): Interview with Jens Martens, Bad Honnef, July 1998, URL. http://bicc.uni-bonn.de/sef/publications/news/no4/speth.html

  • Streeten, P. (1989) Global institutions for an interdependent world. World Development 14(9), 1349–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P., Emmerij, L. and Fortin, C. (1992) International Governance. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Independent Working Group on the Future ofthe United Nations (1995) The UnitedNations in its SecondHalf-Century, (“Qureshi and von Weizsäcker-Report”). New York.

  • Tinbergen, J. (ed.) (1976) RIO--Reshaping the International Order. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touval, S. (1994) Why the U.N. fails. Foreign Affairs 73(5), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union ofInter national Associations (1999) Yearbook of International Organizations. Munich: K.G. Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1999) GEO 2000 Global Environment Outlook. New York, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSG (United Nations Secretary-General) (1992) An Agenda for Peace. Preventive Diplomacy, Peace-Making andPeace-Keeping. Report of the Secretary-General, UN-Dok. A/47/277-S/24111, 17 July 1992.

  • UNSG (1998) Environment andHuman Settlements. Report of the Secretary-General. Report to the 53. Session of the United Nations General Assembly. UN-Dok. A/53/463, 6 October 1998.

  • Victor, D.G., Raustiala, K. and Skolnikoff, E.B. (eds.) (1998) The Implementation andEffectivness of International Environmental Commitments. Theory andPractice. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. (1959) Man, the State, and War. A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, P. (1997) Governance in global civil society. In Global Governance. Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience (O.R. Young, ed.), pp. 65–84.

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our Common Future. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre) (1994) Priorities for Conserving Global Species Richness andEndemism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werksman, J. (ed.) (1996) Greening International Institutions. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O.R. (ed.) (1997) Global Governance. Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaelke, D. and Cameroon, J. (1990) Global warming and climate change. An overview ofthe international law and policy. Amer. Univ. J. Int. Law Policy 5, 249–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonis, U.E. Advancing the debate on a world environment organization. The Environmentalist 22, 29–42 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014567908107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014567908107

Navigation