Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Comparison of WENO Finite Volume and Runge–Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High order WENO (weighted essentially non-oscillatory) schemes and discontinuous Galerkin methods are two classes of high order, high resolution methods suitable for convection dominated simulations with possible discontinuous or sharp gradient solutions. In this paper we first review these two classes of methods, pointing out their similarities and differences in algorithm formulation, theoretical properties, implementation issues, applicability, and relative advantages. We then present some quantitative comparisons of the third order finite volume WENO methods and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a series of test problems to assess their relative merits in accuracy and CPU timing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Biswas, R., Devine, K. D., and Flaherty, J. (1994). Parallel, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Conservation Laws, Applied Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 14, pp. 255–283.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cockburn, B. (1998). An introduction to the discontinuous Galerkin method for convection dominated problems. In Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C.-W., and Tadmor, E. ( Quarteroni, A., ed.), Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Vol. 1697, pp. 151–268.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cockburn, B. (1999). Discontinuous Galerkin methods for convection-dominated problems. In Barth, T. J. and Deconinck, H. (eds.), High-Order Methods for Computational Physics, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Vol. 9, pp. 69–224.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cockburn, B., Karniadakis, G., and rShu, C.-W. (2000). The development of discontinuous Galerkin methods. In Cockburn, B., Karniadakis, G., and Shu, C.-W. (eds.), Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Theory, Computation and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Vol. 11, Part I: Overview, pp. 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cockburn, B., and Shu, C.-W. (1991). The Runge-Kutta local projection P1-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis (M2AN) 25, 337–361.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cockburn, B., and Shu, C.-W. (1989). TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: General framework. Math. Comp. 52, 411–435.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cockburn, B., Lin, S.-Y., and Shu, C.-W. (1989). TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: One dimensional system. J. Comput. Phys. 84, 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cockburn, B., Hou, S., and Shu, C.-W. (1990). The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws IV: The multidimensional case. Math. Comp. 54, 545–581.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cockburn, B., and Shu, C.-W. (1998). The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems. J. Comput. Phys. 141, 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cockburn, B., and Shu, C.-W. (1998). The local discontinuous Galerkin method for timedependent convection-diffusion systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35, 2440–2463.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S. (1987). Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71, 231–303.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu, C., and Shu, C.-W. (1999). Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 150, 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, G.-S., and Shu, C.-W. (1996). Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126g, 202–228.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., and Chan, T. (1994). Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200–212.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shu, C.-W. (1999). High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. In Barth, T. J., and Deconinck, H. (eds.), High-Order Methods for Computational Physics, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Vol. 9, pp. 439–582.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shu, C.-W. (1998). Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. In Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C.-W., and Tadmor, E. ( Quarteroni, A., ed.), Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Vol. 1697, pp. 325–432.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. (1988). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439–471.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. (1989). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32–78.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woodward, P., and Colella, P. (1984). The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 115–173.Printed in Belgium

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, T., Li, Y. & Shu, CW. Numerical Comparison of WENO Finite Volume and Runge–Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Journal of Scientific Computing 16, 145–171 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012282706985

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012282706985

Navigation