Skip to main content
Log in

Two methods of lens opacity measurements in glaucomas

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Determination of lens opacity is important in aging glaucoma patients, because sensory testing may be influenced by increasing lens opacity. Purpose of this study was to measure lens opacity in normals and glaucoma patients using two different techniques, to compare both methods, and to correlate the results with contrast sensitivity testing. Methods: 94 glaucomatous eyes, 47 ocular hypertensive eyes, and 79 control eyes were studied using the following devices: opacity lens meter (OLM, objective back scatter method), stray light meter (SLM, subjective forward scatter using flicker light), and temporal contrast sensitivity (full-field flicker test). SLM results were separately analyzed at the lower and upper flicker disappearance. All subjects were younger than 66 years and had no significant cataracts. Results: In patients and in normal subjects OLM readings and SLM findings elicited at the upper disappearance point are significantly correlated with age and with each other (R>0.45, P<0.001), while SLM at the lower disappearance point shows no such correlation. In normals, but not in patients, SLM at the lower disappearance point is significantly correlated with temporal contrast sensitivity. Conclusions: Both devices can be used for quantifying lens opacity in glaucoma. SLM readings with increasing light intensity at the lower disappearance point seems to be more influenced by the individual flicker sensitivity than determination of the upper flicker disappearance. Therefore, using the SLM in glaucoma patients, the threshold measurements based on the upper disappearance of the flicker should be used instead of the suggested mean threshold measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. David R, Livingstone D, Lunz MH. Ocular hypertension: a long term follow up of treated and untreated patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 61: 663–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costagliola C, De Simone C, Giacoia A, Iuliano G, Landolfo V. Influence of lens opacities on visual field indices. Ophthalmologica 1990; 201: 180–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crichton A, Mikelberg F, Douglas GR, Wijsman K, Drance SM, Hollands R, Sutton H, Schulzer M. Lens opacity as a predictor of visual field impairment due to cataract. Can J Ophthalmol 1990; 25: 287–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Berg TJ, Boltjes B. The point-spread function of the eye from 0 degrees to 100 degrees and the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 67: 347–54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yao K, Flammer J. Relationship cataract density and visual field damage. Eur J Ophthalmol 1993; 3: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flammer J, Bebie H. Lens opacity meter: a new instrument to quantify lens opacity. Ophthalmologica 1987; 195: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ijspeert JK, de Waard PW, van den Berg TJ, de Jong PT. The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation. Vision Res 1990; 30: 699–707.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breton M, Wilson T, Wilson R, Spaeth G, Krupin T. Temporal contrast sensitivity loss in primary open-angle glaucoma and glaucoma suspect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 2931–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horn FK, Jonas J, Korth M, Jünemann A, Gründler A. The full-field flicker test in early diagnosis of chronic open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 3: 313–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korth M, Horn F, Martus P. Einfacher zeitlicher Kontrastempfindlichkeits-Test in der Glaukomdiagnostik. Klein Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 203: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tyler C. Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 204–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tytla M, Trope G, Buncic JR. Flicker sensitivity in treated ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 531–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonas JB, Fernandes CM, Stürmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology 1993; 100, 1: 63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elliot DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 108–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Waard PW, Ijspeert JK, van den Berg TJ, de Jong PT. Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 618–25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Natale R, Flammer J, Zulauf M, Bebie T. Influence of age on the transparency of the lens in normals: a population study with help of the Lens Opacity Meter 701. Ophthalmologica 1988; 197: 14–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clarke MP, Pearson JC, Vernon SA, Matthews JC. Influence of pupil size on measurements made with the Lens Opacity Meter 701. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 526–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color Science. Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. New York: Wiley, 1982: 427.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods of Medical Research, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Oxford Scientific Publications, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Natale R, Flammer J. Lens opacity: a population study. Int Ophthalmol 1992; 16: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bonomi L, Baravelli S, Cobbe C, Tomazzoli L.Evaluation of the 701 interzeag lens opacity meter. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990; 228: 447–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Costagliola C, Iuliano G, Rinaldi E, Trapanese A, Russo V, Camera A, Scibelli G. In vivo measurement of human lens aging using the lens opacity meter. Ophthalmologica 1989; 199: 158–61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. House PH, Schulzer M, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The effect of lens opacity on the resolution visual field in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 83: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jünemann A, Horn FK, Martus P, Korth M. The full-field temporal contrast sensitivity test for glaucoma-influence of cataract. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238: 427–32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Messmer C, Yao K, Stumpfig D, Flammer J. The Opacity Lens Meter 701: clinical experiences. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd1990; 196: 310–1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Costagliola C, Iuliano G, Marino E, Paolercio F, Trapanese A, Apponi-Battini G. Quantification and measurement of human lens opacities using the lens opacity meter. Ophthalmologica 1990; 201: 45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee JA, Taylor HR. The lens opacity meter: a method of quantification of lens opacity by measurement of scattering of incident light. Lens Eye Toxic Res 1990; 7: 31–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fama F, Castagna I, Salmeri G. Influence of pseodoexfoliation syndrome on human lens transparency. Ann Ophthalmol 1993; 25: 440–1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Siik S, Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A. Light scatter in aging and cataractous human lens. Acta Ophthalmol 1992; 70: 383–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Horn FK, Korth M, Martus P. Quick full-field flicker test in glaucoma diagnosis: correlations with perimetry and papillometry. J Glaucoma 1994; 3: 206–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, F.K., Jünemann, A.G. & Korth, M. Two methods of lens opacity measurements in glaucomas. Doc Ophthalmol 103, 105–117 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012263922188

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012263922188

Navigation