Skip to main content
Log in

Autocorrelation and Bias in Short Time Series: An Alternative Estimator

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conventional first-order autocorrelationcoefficient r1 generates an empiricalbias when it is applied to short time series.The properties of this estimator have beenexamined with a Monte Carlo simulation studyusing the MATLAB program (version5.2). This study also analyzes the functionof the empirical bias with the polynomicregression and derives a polynomic fittingmodel for different sample sizes. In thisway, a new estimator that has been correctedby the absolute value of the fitting model(r1') is proposed. Having analyzed thestatistical properties of the estimator r1',it is shown that the empirical bias generatedby r1' is less in relationship to r1 andr1+. The results of the study make itpossible to verify that the mean squared errorassociated to the estimator r1 isless than that of r1. Thus, the coefficient r1'is recommended to estimate the lag-oneautocorrelation coefficient in samples under 50observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. L. (1942). Distribution of the serial correlation coefficient. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 13: 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnau, J. (1999). Reducció n del sesgo en la estimació n de la autocorrelació n en series temporales cortas. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento 1: 25-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnau, J. & Bono, R. (1998). Short time series analysis: C statistic vs Edgington model. Quality and Quantity 32: 63-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1946). On the theoretical specification and sampling properties of autocorrelated time-series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 8: 27-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, R. (1995). Diseñ os de series temporales interrumpidas: técnicas alternativas de análisis. Doctoral dissertation. Barcelona: Publicacions Universitat de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, R. & Arnau, J. (1996). C statistic power analysis through simulation. Psicothema 8: 699-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, R.& Arnau, J. (1997). Statistic C: Application to behavioral designs. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 29: 49-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, R. & Arnau, J. (1998). Estadístico C: descripció n y aplicació n a diseñ os de caso ú nico. Psicoló gica 19: 27-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busk, P. L. & Marascuilo, L. A. (1988). Autocorrelation in single-subject research: A counterargument to the myth of no autocorrelation. Behavioral Assessment 10: 229-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo, L. T. & Tryon, W.W. (1993). Estimating and testing autocorrelation with small samples: A comparison of the C-statistic to a modified estimator. Behavior Research Theory 31: 781-788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J. (1944). Further contributions to the problem of serial correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 15: 119-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, G. E., Malcolm, M. A. & Moler, C. B. (1977). Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1976). Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, J. R., Roden, A. H. & Klein, R. D. (1972). An analysis-of-variance model for the intrasubject replication design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 5: 193-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L. & Gottman, J. M. (1975). Design and Analysis of Time Series Experiments. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, K. M. & Matyas, T. A. (1990). Problems with the application of interrupted time series analysis for brief single-subject data. Behavioral Assessment 12: 355-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrop, J. W. & Velicer, W. F. (1985). A comparison of alternative approaches to the analysis of interrupted time-series. Multivariate Behavioral Research 20: 27-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, D. P. (1974). Forcing square pegs into round holes: Some comments on an analysis of variance model for the intrasubject design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7: 635-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, D. P., Gottman, J.M., Jones, R. R., Gardner, W., Kazdin, A. E. & Vaught, R. S. (1980). Interrupted time-series analysis and its application to behavioral data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 13: 543-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment 7: 107-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. (1986). Autocorrelation in behavior modification data:Wherefore art thou?. In A. Poling & R.W. Fuqua (eds), Research Methods in Applied Behavior Analysis: Issues and Advances. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 187-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. (1988). Autocorrelation: 10 years of confusion. Behavioral Assessment 10: 253-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. & McKean, J. W. (1991). Autocorrelation estimation and inference with small samples. Psychological Bulletin 110: 291-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. & McKean, J. W. (1994a). Reduced bias autocorrelation estimation: three jackknife methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement 54: 654-665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. & McKean, J.W. (1994b). Two reduced-bias autocorrelation estimators: r F1 and r F2. Perceptual and Motor Skills 78: 323-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. & McKean, J. W. (1994c). Tests of H0: ρ1 = 0 for autocorrelation estimators r F1 and r F2. Perceptual and Motor Skills 78: 331-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema, B. E. & McKean, J. W. (1996). Tests for the jackknife autocorrelation estimator r Q2. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56: 232-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc. (1989). IMSL Library 3. Houston, TX: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. R., Vaught, R. S. & Weinrott, M. (1977). Time-series analysis in operant research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10: 151-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1954). Note on bias in the estimation of autocorrelation. Biometrika 41: 403-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J. & Leventhal, L. (1974). Concerning the statistical procedures enumerated by Gentile et al.: Another perspective. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7: 643-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Aldin, K., Demuth, D., Dawson, D. L., Panicucci, C., Arnston, P., McMurray, N., Hempstead, J. & Levin, J. (1974). A further consideration in the application of an analysis-ofvariance model for the intrasubject replication design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7: 629-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, F. H. C. & Pope, J. A. (1954). Bias in the estimation of autocorrelation. Biometrika 41: 390-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB. (1998). The Language of Technical Computing (version 5.2). Natick, MA: The Math-Works, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matyas, T. A. & Greenwood, K. M. (1991). Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behavioral Assessment 13: 137-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, R. & Hay, R. A., Jr. (1980). Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, J. W. & Huitema, B. E. (1993). Small sample properties of the Spearman autocorrelation estimator. Perceptual and Motor Skills 76: 384-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1948). Some theorems on Time Series II. The significance of the serial correlation coefficient. Biometrika 35: 255-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1990). SAS Language: Reference (version 6, First Ed.). Cary, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. F. & Alavosius, M. P. (1988). Autocorrelation in behavioral data: An alternative perspective. Behavioral Assessment 10: 243-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine, L. C. & Bower, S. M. (1971). A one-way analysis of variance for single-subject designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31: 105-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1977). Cross-sectional time-series experiments: Some suggested statistical analyses. Psychological Bulletin 84: 489-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suen, H. K. (1987). On the epistemology of autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis. Behavioral Assessment 9: 113-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suen, H. K. & Ary, D. (1987). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality?. Behavioral Assessment 9: 125-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorensen, C. E. & Elashoff, J. D. (1974). An analysis of variance model for intrasubject replication design: Some additional comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 7: 639-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F. & Harrop, J. W. (1983). The reliability and accuracy of the time-series model identification. Evaluation Review 7: 551-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F. & McDonald, R. P. (1984). Time series analysis without model identification. Multivariate Behavioral Research 19: 33-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F. & McDonald, R. P. (1991). Cross-sectional time series designs: A general transformation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 26: 247-254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnau, J., Bono, R. Autocorrelation and Bias in Short Time Series: An Alternative Estimator. Quality & Quantity 35, 365–387 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012223430234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012223430234

Navigation