Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of liquefaction features in paleoseismology: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States

  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent study in the New Madrid seismic zone demonstrates that large uncertainties, often involved but rarely expressed, in paleoliquefaction studies can be reduced by conducting detailed investigations at the most promising sites for dating liquefaction features. During the site investigations, care must be taken to collect samples that will provide close maximum and minimum dates for liquefaction features. It is advisable to use two-sigma calibrated dates, rather than one-sigma calibrated dates or radiocarbon ages, when estimating ages of liquefaction features. Well-constrained ages of individual liquefaction features should provide the basis for estimating the timing of paleoearthquakes and correlating features across a region. As uncertainty in ages of liquefaction features decreases, confidence in estimates of timing, source areas and magnitudes of paleoearthquakes increases. The New Madrid study also shows that modern or historic earthquakes that induced liquefaction in the same region and whose locations and magnitudes are fairly well know can serve as calibration events for paleoearthquakes. Future efforts that could further improve the usefulness of liquefaction feature in paleoseismology include (1) the development of new techniques for dating liquefaction features directly, (2) case studies of modern earthquakes that focus on the site and spatial distributions of liquefaction feature as well as geotechnical properties of liquefaction sites and (3) more rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with estimates of timing, source areas and magnitudes of paleoearthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.R.L., 1982, Sedimentary Structures: Their Character and Physical Basis, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N.N., 1988, Engineering Seismology: earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, J. Int. Assoc. Earthquake Enging. 17, 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amick, D., Gelinas, R., Maurath, G., Cannon, R., Moore, D., Billington, E., and Kemppinen, H., 1990, Paleoliquefaction Features along the Atlantic Seaboard, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-5613, 146 pp.

  • Arias, A., 1970, A measure of earthquake intensity, In: Hansen, R.J. (ed.), Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audemard, F. and de Santis, F., 1991, Survey of liquefaction structures induced by recent moderate earthquakes, Bull. Int. Assoc. Enging. Geol. 44, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braile, L., Hinze, W., Sexton, J., Keller, R. and Lidiak, E., 1984, Tectonic development of the New Madrid seismic zone, In: Gori, P.L. and Hayes, W.W. (eds), Proc. Symp. on the New Madrid Earthquakes, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 84–770, pp. 204–233.

  • Braile, L.W., Hinze, W.J., Von Frese, R.R.B. and Keller, G.R., 1988, Seismic properties of the crust and upper-most mantle of North America, In: Pakiser, L.C. and Mooney, W. (eds), Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Geological Survey Memoir, 172.

  • Buschbach, T.C. and Schwalb, H.R., 1984, Sedimentary geology of the New Madrid seismic zone, In: Gori, P.L. and Hayes, W.W. (eds), Proc. Symp. on the New Madrid Earthquakes, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 84–770, pp. 64–96.

  • Craven, J.A., III, 1995, Paleoseismological Study in the New Madrid Seismic Zone using Geological and Archeological Features to Constrain Ages of Liquefaction Deposits, M.S. Thesis, Memphis, Tennessee, University of Memphis, 51 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, M., 1995, An Arkansas Odyssey, Little Rock, Rose Publishing, 684 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M.L., 1912, The New Madrid Earthquake, US Geological Survey Bulletin 494, 119 pp.

  • Holzer, T.L. and Clark, M.M., 1993, Sand boils without earthquakes, Geology 21, 873–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara, K., 1985, Stability of Natural Soils During Earthquakes, Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, 1, pp. 321–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A.C., 1996, Seismic moment assessment of stable continental earthquakes, Part III: 1811–1812 New Madrid, 1886 Charleston and 1755 Lisbon, Geophys. J. Int. 126, 314–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A.C. and Schweig, E.S., 1996, The enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811–1812, Ann. Rev. Earth & Planet. Sci. 24, 339–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayen, R.E. and Mitchell, J.K., 1997, Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Enging. 123(12), 1162–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelson, K.L, Simpson, G.D., Van Arsdale, R.B., Harris, J.B., Hamdan, C.C. and Lettis, W.R., 1996, Multiple Holocene earthquakes along the Reelfoot fault, central New Madrid seismic zone, J. Geophys. Res. 101(B3), 6151–6170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuribayashi, E. and Tatsuoka, F., 1975, Brief review of liquefaction during earthquakes in Japan, Soils and Foundations 15, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Craven, J., Schweig, E.S., Obermeier, S.F., 1996, Sand boils induced by the 1993 Mississippi River flood: Could they one day be misinterpreted as earthquake-induced liquefaction?, Geology 24(2), 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Schweig, E., Tuttle, M.P. and Ellis, M.A., 1998, Evidence for large prehistoric earthquakes in the northern New Madrid seismic zone, central United States, Seism. Res. Lett. 69, 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D.R., 1975, Water escape structures in coarse-grained sediment, Sedimentology 22, 157–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D.F. and Morse, P.A., 1983, Archaeology of the Central Mississippi Valley, Academic Press, San Diego, 345 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D.F. and Morse, P.A., 1996, Northeast Arkansas, In: McNutt, C.H. (ed.), Prehistory of the Central Mississippi Valley, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, P.J., Obermeier, S.F., Munson, C.A. and Hajic, E.R., 1997, Liquefaction evidence for Holocene and late Pleistocene seismicity in the southern halves of Indiana and Illinois: A preliminary overview, Seism. Res. Lett. 68(4), 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G.E., 1961, Geology of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province of North America, Harper and Brothers, New York, 692 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeier, S.F., Gohn, G.S., Weems, R.E., Gelinas, R.L. and Rubin, M., 1985, Geologic evidence for recurrent moderate to large earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina, Science 227, 408–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeier, S.F., 1989, The New Madrid earthquakes: An engineering-geologic interpretation of relict liquefaction features, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1336-R, 114 pp.

  • Obermeier, S.F., Jacobson, R.B., Smoot, J.P., Weems, R.E., Gohn, G.S., Monroe, J.E. and Powars, D.S., 1990, Earthquake-induced liquefaction features in the coastal setting of South Carolina and in the fluvial setting of the New Madrid seismic zone, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1504, 44 pp.

  • Obermeier, S.F., Martin, J.R., Frankel, A.D., Youd, T.L., Munson, P.J., Munson, C.A. and Pond, E.C., 1993, Liquefaction evidence for one or more strong Holocene earthquakes in theWabash Valley of southern Indiana and Illinois, with a preliminary estimate of magnitude, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1536, 27 pp.

  • Obermeier, S.F., 1996, Using liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis, In: McCalpin, J.P. (ed.), Paleoseismology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 331–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, H.G., 1987, Deformation processes in unconsolidated sands, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 29, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond, E.C., 1996, Seismic Parameters from the Central United States Based on Paleoliquefaction Evidence in the Wabash Valley, PhD. Dissertation, Virginia Poytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia, 583 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, D.P., 1982, Style and significance of surface deformation in the vicinity of New Madrid, Missouri, In: McKeown, F.A. and Pakiser, L.C. (eds), Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquake Region, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1236, pp. 94–114.

  • Saucier, R.T., 1977, Effects of the New Madrid Earthquake Series in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Paper S-77-5.

  • Saucier, R.T., 1991, Geoarchaeological evidence of strong prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid (Missouri) seismic zone, Geology 19, 296–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, R.T., 1994, Geomorphology and Quaternary Geologic History of the Lower Mississippi, US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, I&II, 364 pp. and 28 plates.

  • Schneider, J., Camp, B. and Mayne, P.W., 1999, Soil Liquefaction Assessment in Mid-America by Seismic Piezocone Tests, Seismological Society of America, Eastern Section Meeting, Program and Abstracts, pp. 19–20.

  • Seed, H.B., 1979, Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes, Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Enging, J. Geotech. Engng. 105, pp. 201–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H.B. and Idriss, LM., 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, University of California, Berkeley, 134 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H.B., Idriss, L.M. and Arango, L., 1983, Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data, J. Geotech. Enging. 109, 458–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F. and Chung, R.M., 1985, Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation, J. Geotech. Enging. 111, 1425–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J.D., 1973, Earthquake-induced structures in sediments of Van Norman Lake, San Fernando California, Science 182, 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J.D. and Garvin, C.D., 1995, Recurrent liquefaction at Soda Lake, California, induced by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and 1990 and 1991 aftershocks: Implications for paleoseismicity studies, Seism. Soc. Am. Bull. 85, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, R. and Nuttli, O., 1984, The central Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811–1812, In: Proc. Symp. on ‘The New Madrid Seismic Zone,’ US Geological Survey Open-File Report 84–770, pp. 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuiver, M., Long A., Kra, R.S. and Devine, J.M., 1993, Calibration – 1993, Radiocarbon 35(1), 244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwani, P. and Cox, J., 1985, Paleoseismic evidence for recurrence of earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina, Science 228, 379–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P., Law, T., Seeber, L. and Jacob, K., 1990, Liquefaction and ground failure induced by the 1988 Saguenay, Quebec earthquake, Can. Geotech. J. 27, 580–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P. and Seeber, L., 1991, Historic and prehistoric earthquake-induced liquefaction in Newbury, Massachusetts, Geology 19, 594–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P., Cowie, P. and Wolf, L., 1992, Liquefaction induced by modern earthquakes as a key to paleoseismicity: A case study of the 1988 Saguenay event, Proc. 19th Int. Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting, NUREG/CP-01 19, 3, pp. 437–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M. and Barstow, N., 1996, Liquefaction-related ground failure: A case study in the New Madrid seismic zone, tentral United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86(3), 636–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P., Lafferty, R.H., Guccione, M.J., Schweig, E.S., Lopinot, N., Cande, R.F., Dyer-Williams, K. and Haynes, M., 1996, Use of archaeology to date liquefaction features and seismic events in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States, Geoarchaeology 11(6), 451–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P., Collier, J., Wolf, L.W. and Lafferty, R.H., 1999, New evidence for a large earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone between A.D. 1400 and 1670, Geology 27(9), 771–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, M.P., 1999, Late Holocene Earthquakes and their Implications for Earthquake Potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone, Central United States, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, 250 pp.

  • Vaughn, J.D., 1994, Paleoseismological Studies in the Western Lowlands of Southeastern Missouri, Final Report to the U.S. Geological Survey for grant number 14-08-0001-61931, 27 pp.

  • Wesnousky, S.G. and Leffler, L., 1992, The repeat time of the 1811 and 1812 New Madrid earthquakes: A geological perspective, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1756–1785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnousky, S.G. and Johnson, D.L., 1996, Stratigraphic, paleosol and C-14 evidence for a large pre-1811 magnitude earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone, Seism. Res. Lett. 67(2), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.C., 1993, Relation of Arias Intensity to Magnitude and Distance in California, US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 93–556.

  • Youd, T.L., 1973, Liquefaction, Flow and Associated Ground Failure, US Geological Survey, Circular 688, 12 pp.

  • Youd, T.L., 1984, Geologic Effects – Liquefaction and Associated Ground Failure, US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 84–760, pp. 210–232.

  • Youd, T.L. and Perkins, D.M., 1987, Mapping of liquefaction severity index, J. Geotech. Enging. 113(11), 1374–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd, T.L. and Garris, C.T., 1995, Liquefaction-induced groundfailure disruption, J. Geotech. Enging. 121(11), 805–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback, M.L. and Zoback, M.D., 1989, Tectonic stress field of the continental United States, In: Pakiser, L.C. and Mooney, W.D. (eds), Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Geological Society of America Memoir 172, pp. 523–539.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. M. Tuttle & Associates, 128 Tibbets Lane, Georgetown, ME, 04548, USA

    Martitia P. Tuttle

Authors
  1. Martitia P. Tuttle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuttle, M.P. The use of liquefaction features in paleoseismology: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States. Journal of Seismology 5, 361–380 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011423525258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011423525258

Keywords

Search

Navigation