Abstract
We evaluate the farm sector impacts that would result from implementing a system of carbon based charges on energy intensive inputs. Our emphasis is on production costs, crop acreage, commodity prices, input use, farm income, and farm welfare. The charges considered – $14, $100, and$200 per metric ton of carbon – were developed from the literature and areconsistent with reducing U.S. GHG emissions to a 1990 minus 7% level by 2010 underdifferent levels of carbon trading and developing country participation. Impacts are relatively modest for a charge of $14 per mt. Relative to baseline conditions, producer and consumer surplus decline 0.02 and 0.03 percent, respectively. Across crop and livestock commodities, price increases and production declines are all less than 1.0%. As the carbon charge increases, farm sector impacts become more pronounced and determination of whether the aggregate effect is significant or not becomes more subjective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Administration's Economic Analysis: 1998, The Kyoto Protocol and the President's Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration's Economic Analysis, Washington, D.C.
Bernstein, P. M., Montgomery, W. D., Rutherford, T. F., and Yang, G. F., 1999: 'Effects of Restrictions on International Permit Trading: The MS-MRT Model', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 221–256.
Bollen, J., Gielen, A., and Timmer, H.: 1999, 'Clubs, Ceilings, and CDM: Macroeconomics of Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 177–206.
Brown, S., Kennedy, D., Polidano, C., Woffenden, K., Jakeman, G., Graham, B., Jotzo, F., and Fisher, B. S.: 1999, Economic Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Accounting for the Three Major Greenhouse Gases. ABARE Research Report 99.6, Canberra.
Burfisher, M., House, R., and Langley, S.: 1992, 'Effects of a Free Trade Agreement on U.S. and Southern Agriculture', Southern J. Agric. Econ. (July), 61–78.
Charles River Associates: 1998, How Much Could Kyoto Really Cost? A Reconstruction and Reconciliation of the Administration's Estimates, Washington, D.C.
Cooper, A., Livermore, S., Rossi, V., Wilson, A., and Walker, J.: 1999, 'The Economic Implications of Reducing Carbon Emissions: A Cross-Country Quantitative Investigation Using the Oxford Global Macroeconomic and Energy Model', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 335–365.
Denbaly, M., and Vroomen, H.: 1991, Elasticities of Fertilizer Demands for Corn in the Short and Long Run: A Cointegrated and Error-Correcting System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AGES 9137.
Fernandez-Cornejo, J.: 1993, Demand and Substitution of Agricultural Inputs in the Central Corn Belt States, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Tech. Bulletin Number 1816, p. 27.
Francl, T.: 1997, Potential Economic Impact of the Global Climate Treaty on the Agricultural Sector, American Farm Bureau, Washington, D.C.
Heimlich, R., Weibe, K., Claassen, R., Gadsby, D., and House, R.: 1998, Wetlands and Agriculture: Private Interests and Public Benefits. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AER No. 765, September.
Helsel, Z. R.: 1987, 'Energy in Plant Nutrition and Plant Control', in Helsel, Z. R. (ed.), Energy in World Agriculture – Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control, Vol. 2, Elsevier Scientific Publications, Amsterdam, pp. 41–49.
Horner, G., Hatchett, S., House, R., and Howitt, R.: 1990, 'Impacts of San Joaquin Valley Drainage-Related Policies on State and National Agricultural Production', National Impact of Drainage-Related Policies, University of California and San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program, University of California-Davis.
House, R., Peters, M., Baumes, H., and Disney, W. T.: 1993, Ethanol and Agriculture: Effect of Increased Production on Crop and Livestock Sectors, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AIB 667 (May).
Jacoby, H. D. and Wing, I. S.: 1999, 'Adjustment Time, Capital Malleability, and Policy Cost', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 73–92.
Kainuma, M., Matsuoka, Y., and Morita, T.: 1999, 'Analysis of Post-Kyoto Scenarios: The Asian-Pacific Integrated Model', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: AMulti-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 207–220.
MacCracken, C. N., Edmonds, J. A., Kim, S. H., and Sands, R. D.: 1999, 'The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 25–71.
Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G.: 1999, 'The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?' The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 1–24.
McCarl, B., Gowen, M., Schneider, U., and Yeats, T.: 1999, The Impact of Carbon Permit Prices on the U.S. Agricultural Sector, ICF Incorporated, Washington, D.C.
McDowell, H., Lewandrowski, J., House, R., and Peters, M.: 1999, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Buildup: Potential Impacts on Farm-Sector Returns, Agricultural Outlook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (August), pp. 19–23.
McKibbin, W. J., Ross, M. T., Shackleton, R., and Wilcoxen, P. J.: 1999, 'Emissions Trading, Capital Flows, and the Kyoto Protocol', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., 287–333.
Miller, T., Sharples, J., House, R., Moore, C.: 1985, Increasing World Grain Market Fluctuations: Implications for U.S. Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AER-541 (October).
Nordhaus, W. D. and Boyer, J. G.: 1999, 'Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol', The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, A Special Issue of the Energy J., pp. 93–130.
Padgitt, M.: 1999, Provided summary ERS survey data on pesticide use, Data Coordinator, Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA (personal communication).
Peters, M., McDowel, H., and House, R.: 1997, 'Environmental and Economic Effects of Taxing Nitrogen Fertilizer', Selected Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economic Associated, Toronto (July).
Shumway, R. C. and Alexander, W. P.: 1988, 'Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons', Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 70, 154–161.
Shumway, R. C., Saez, R. R., and Gottret, P. E., 1988, 'Multiproduct Supply and Input Demand in U.S. Agriculture', Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 70, 330–337.
Sparks Companies, Inc.: 1999, United Nations Kyoto Protocol – Potential Impacts on U.S. Agriculture, Sparks Companies Incorporated, McLean, VA.
Spinelli, F., Disney, W., Blackwell, J., and Metcalf, H., 1996: 'U.S. Economic Impact of Uncooked Beef Imports from Argentina', Selected Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economic Associated (July), San Antonio. United States Department of Agriculture: 1992, Cropping Practices Survey Data, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1994, 1992 National Resources Inventory Digital Data, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1996, Agricultural Resource Management Study, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1997, 'Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators: 1996–1997', ERS Agricultural Handbook Number 712 (July), Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1998a, USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2007, Interagency Agricultural Projections Committee, Staff Report No. WAOB-98-1, February 1998, p. 132.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1998b, U.S. Agricultural Trade Update, Monthly Supplement to Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (23 October), Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1999a, Economic Analysis of U.S. Agriculture and the Kyoto Protocol (May), Office of the Chief Economist.
United States Department of Agriculture: 1999b, Agricultural Outlook (April), Economic Research Service Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture: 2000, see Economic Research Service internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/farmincome/firkdmu.htm
United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Agency: 1997a, Annual Energy Outlook: 1998, December, DOE/EIA-0383 (96).
United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Agency: 1997b, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States: 1996 (December), DOE/EIA-0573 (96).
Uri, N. D. and Gill, M.: 1990, 'Demand for Gasoline and Diesel Fuel by Farmers in the USA', Int. J. Energy Res. 15, 289–299.
Uri, N. D. and Gill, M.: 1995, 'The Agricultural Demand for Electricity in the United States', Int. J. Energy Res. 19, 145–157.
Villazca-Becerra, P. and Shumway, C. R.: 1993, 'State-Level Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities for Agricultural Commodities', J. Agric. Econ. Res. 44, 22–34.
Wiese, A. M. 1998, Impacts of Market-Based Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policies on U.S. Manufacturing Competitiveness, Research Study No. 90, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C. (Received 3 May 2000; in revised form 16 February 2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peters, M., House, R., Lewandrowski, J. et al. Economic Impacts of Carbon Charges on U.S. Agriculture. Climatic Change 50, 445–473 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010684106573
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010684106573