Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: Clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Current coronary angiographic techniques display complex three-dimensional (3D) coronary structures in two dimensions (2D). We have developed a 3D reconstruction (3DR) algorithm using standard single-plane angiographic images that allows for 3D display of coronary structures. The purpose of this study was to validate our 3DR algorithm and quantify anatomic characteristics of the right coronary artery (RCA) in vivo. Methods: Accuracy and reproducibility studies were performed using 3DRs of a coronary phantom and in vivo following 3DRs in 40 patients. The anatomic features of the RCA were then quantified in 100 patients. Results: Comparison of length and bifurcation angles (BA) from the phantom to the 3DRs revealed good accuracy and correlation for both (r = 0.95 and 0.93 respectively), with diameter error of <7%. In vivo, the average root mean square (RMS) error in the spatial coordinates of the vessel centerlines was 3.12 ± 0.77 and 3.16 ± 0.75 mm in 20 left coronary arteries (LCA) and 20 RCAs respectively. Interobserver average RMS error was 3.47 ± 1.96 mm and intraobserver average RMS error was 3.02 ± 1.07 and 3.44 ± 1.57 mm for two different operators (p = NS). The average RCA length was 10.2 ± 1.7 cm, average radius of curvature (ROC) was 52 ± 9°, and the average 3D bifurcation angle of the posterior descending artery (PDA) from the RCA was 55 ± 22°. Foreshortening (FS) of the segments of the RCA in three 'standard’ projections ranged from 0–60, 0–75, and 0–82% respectively. Conclusions: Using our 3DR algorithm patient-specific anatomic characteristics can be accurately displayed and quantified, expanding the information that can be derived from routine coronary angiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Hoffmann KR, Metz CE, Chen SY. Determination of 3D imaging geometry and object configurations from two biplane views: an enhancement of the Metz-Fencil technique. Med Phys 1995; 22: 1219–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SY, Metz CE. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees. Med Phys 1997; 24: 633–654.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen SY, Hoffmann KR, Carroll, JD. Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial tree based on biplane angiograms. Proc SPIE Med Imag: Image Processing 1996; 2710: 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SY, Carroll JD. 3D coronary angiography: improving visualization strategy for coronary interventions. In: Reiber JHC, van der Wall EE, editors. What's New in Cardiovascular Imaging? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998; 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SY, Carroll JD. 3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000; 19: 318–336.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prause GP, DeJong SC, McKay CR, Sonka M. Semi-automated segmentation and 3D reconstruction of coronary trees: biplane angiography and intravascular ultrasound data fusion. SPIE Med Imag: Physiol func from multidimen images 1996; 2709: 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winer BJ. Analysis of covariance. In: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971; 752–809.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parker DL, Pope DL, Van Bree R, Marshall HW. Three-dimensional reconstruction of moving arterial beds from digital subtraction angiography. Comput Biomed Res 1987; 20: 166–185.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pellot C, Herment A, Sigelle M, Horain P, Maitre H, Peronneau P. A 3D reconstruction of vascular structures from two X-ray angiograms using an adapted simulated annealing algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1994; 13: 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I, Sauer HU, Oswald H, Fleck E. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1995; 14: 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen TV, Sklansky J. Reconstructing the 3D medial axes of coronary arteries in single-view cineangiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1994; 13: 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delaere D, Smets C, Suetens P, Marchal G, Van de Werf F. Knowledge-based system for the three-dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels from two angiographic projections. Med Biol Eng Comput 1991; 29: NS27-NS36.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu I, Sun Y. Fully automated reconstruction of three-dimensional vascular tree structures from two orthogonal views using computational algorithms and production rules. Opt Eng 1992; 31: 2197–2207.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rougee A, Picard C, Saint-Felix D, Trousset Y, Moll T, Amiel M. Three-dimensional coronary arteriography. Int J Card Imaging 1994; 10: 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metz CE, Fencil LE. Determination of three-dimensional structure in biplane radiography without prior knowledge of the relationship between the two views: theory. Med Phys 1989; 16: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weng J, Ahuja N, Huang TS. Optimal motion and structure estimation. IEEE Trans on PAMI 1993; 15: 864–884.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basic structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree-basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992; 85: 1987–2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein JL, Hoff JG, Peifer JW, et al. A quantitative evaluation of the three-dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging 1998; 14: 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muhlestein JB, Zhang Q, Parker DJ, Horn SD, Parker DL, Anderson JL. A comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of digital three-dimensional coronary artery reconstructions using edge detection or videodensitometry. Comput Biomed Res 1997; 30: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I, Gross J, Oswald H, Fleck E. Validation of an accurate method of three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int J Card Imaging 1999; 15: 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sato Y, Araki T, Hanayama M, Naito H, Tamura S. A viewpoint determination system for stenosis diagnosis and quantification in coronary angiographic image acquisition. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1998; 17: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll JD, Chen SY, Groves BM, Schaefer C. Coronary bypass grafts: assessment of critical 3D anatomic features. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 139A.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen SY, Carroll JD. Dynamic reconstruction of 3D coronary arterial trees based on a sequence of biplane angiograms. Proc SPIE Med Imag: Image Processing 1997; 3034: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen SY, Carroll JD, Groves BM, Kaufman D. 3D coronary reconstruction and kinetic motion analysis to quantify regional mechanical susceptibility to plaque rupture. Circulation 1997; 96: I290-I291.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gross MF, Friedman MH. Dynamics of coronary artery curvature obtained from biplane cineangiograms. J Biomech 1998; 31: 479–484.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zamir M. Tree structure and branching characteristics of the right coronary artery in a right-dominant human heart. Can J Cardiol 1996; 12: 593–599.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zamir M, Brown N. Internal geometry of arterial bifurcations. J Biomech 1983: 857–863.

  29. Tan K, Sulke N, Taub N, Sowton E. Clinical and lesion morphologic determinants of coronary angioplasty success and complications: current experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 855–865.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phillips PS, Alfonso F, Segovia J, et al. Effects of Palmaz-Schatz stents on angled coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor of major adverse cardiac events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1580–1589.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messenger, J.C., Chen, S.J., Carroll, J.D. et al. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: Clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 16, 413–427 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010643426720

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010643426720