Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of the Internet and the Standard Textbook in Preparing for the Professional Anaesthetic Examination

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Internet is increasingly being recognised as a source of informationin different fields, and medicine is no exception. We investigated the use ofthe Internet as an aid in preparing for the professional medical examinations.The Internet was compared to a standard textbook in answering a randomlyselected past examination paper. Thirty-eight web-sites on the Internet wereinvolved, giving information to all the examination questions. In contrast,the textbook provided adequate information in only 73.3% of the questions. Thetime required to search for information on the Internet was more than thatrequired for a single textbook. (approximately 2 hours per question comparedto 30 minutes per question respectively). However, with the rapid developmentof computer technology and the cyberspace, the Internet may prove to be aviable alternative or a good supplement to the standard textbook when traineeanaesthetists are preparing for their professional medical examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Glowniak JV. Medical resources on the Internet. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 123–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pallen M. Introducing the Internet. BMJ 1995; 311: 1422–1444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oyston JP, Ascah JG. The value of the Internet to anaes-thetists. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yentis SM, Ooi R. Anaesthesia and the Internet. Anaes-thesia 1996; 51: 677–682

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ruskin KJ, Kofte A, Turndorf H. The Anesthesiology Discussion Group: Development of a new method of communication between anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 163–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doyle DJ. Future developments with the Internet: Some personal predictions. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1996; 13: 95–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Relman AS. The NIH “E-Biomed” proposal-a potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. N Engl JMed 1999; 340: 1828–1829

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bingham C, Van Der Weyden MB. Peer review on the Internet: Launching eMJA peer review study 2. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 240–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swartz MK. Evaluating Information on the Internet. J Pediatr Health Care 1998; 12: 335–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: Evaluation, label-ing, and ¢ltering of information. BMJ 1998; 317: 1496–1502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Max¢eld A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: Review. BMJ 1999; 318: 647–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oshero¡ JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA. Physicians' information needs: Analysis of questions posed during clinical teach-ing.Ann InternMed 1991; 114: 576–581

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, J.M.J.A., Ho, K.M. A Comparison of the Internet and the Standard Textbook in Preparing for the Professional Anaesthetic Examination. J Clin Monit Comput 15, 449–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009996518130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009996518130

Navigation