Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the influence of habitat and chemical factors on instream biotic integrity for a Southern Ohio watershed

  • Published:
Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery

Abstract

The relative influences of water quality and in-streamhabitat on receiving water biology were investigatedin the Little Miami River, Ohio, a national and statescenic river located in the southwest corner of thestate. Monitored sample data for water chemistry,habitat, invertebrates and fish were obtained fromfederal and state sources and integrated via ageographical information system (GIS), using a uniquestream segmenting system. Locations and flowinformation for municipal wastewater treatment plants(WWTPs) were also integrated into the system. Therelative importance of water chemistry and habitat onbiological sample information was determined usingmultivariate forward stepwise regression. Theprincipal environmental factors that influencedbiological responses were in-stream habitat andpercent cumulative WWTP effluent at mean flow. Cumulative WWTP effluent at low flow dilution,nutrients and total toxic units from metals andammonia did not correlate with biological responses(e.g. number of mayfly species, invertebrate communityindex (ICI), number of fish species and index ofbiotic integrity (IBI)). We found the GIS-based datamethods to be highly useful for understanding theprincipal processes that guide receiving water health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Draper, N.R. & H. Smith, 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU, 1996. Technical guidance documents in support of the commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances and the commission regulation (EC) 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances (Parts I–IV). Ispra, Italy, pp. 735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L.W., S.A. Fischer, W.D. Killen, Jr., M.C. Scott, M.C. Ziegenfuss & R.D. Anderson, 1994. Status assessment in acid-sensitive and non-acid-sensitive Maryland coastal plain streams using an integrated biological, chemical, physical, and land-use approach. J. Aquat. Ecosys. Hlth. 3: 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L.W., M.C. Scott, W.D. Killen, Jr. & R.D. Anderson, 1996. The effects of land-use characteristics and acid sensitivity on the ecological status of Maryland coastal plain streams. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15: 384–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D.R. & J.K. Crawford, 1994. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia 294: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA, 1988. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life, volume 2: Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters}. Ecological Assessment Section, State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agengy, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA, 1995a. Biological and water quality study of the Little Miami River and selected tributaries, volume 1. OEPA Technical Report MAS/1994-12-11, pp. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA, 1995b. Associations between the aquatic biota, habitat, and nutrients in Ohio rivers ans streams. OEPA Technical Report MAS1995-4-1, July 27 draft, pp. 51.

  • Omernik, J.M., 1988. Ecoregions of the coterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 77: 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E.T., 1989. The qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI): Rationale, methods and application. Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, L.P., 1996. Multivariate techniques relating macroinvertebrate and environmental data from a river catchment. Wat. Res. 30: 3017–3024.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th edition, volume 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touart, L.W., 1995. The federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act. In: G.M. Rand (ed.), Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, 2nd edition (Chapter 21). pp. 657–668. Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA, 1984a. Ambient water quality criteria for: Cadmium. EPA 440/5-84-032, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1984b. Copper water quality standards criteria summaries: A compilation of state and federal criteria. EPA 440-588-027, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1984c. Ambient water quality criteria for: Lead. EPA 440/5-84-027, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1985. Ambient water quality criteria for: Ammonia. EPA 440/5-85-001, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1986. Ambient water quality criteria for: Nickel. EPA 440/5-86-004, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1987a. Ambient water quality criteria for: Silver. Draft 9/24/87. U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA, 1987b. Ambient water quality criteria for: Zinc. EPA 440/5-87-003, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. EPA, 1988. State water quality standards summary: Ohio. EPA 440/5 88-070, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. E.P.A., 1989. Report to Congress: 1988 NEEDS Survey: Assessment of needed publicaly owned wastewater treatment facilities in the United tates. EPA 430/8-89-001. Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. E.P.A., Region IX, 1992. STORET Documentation for Menu-Driven User Interface. EPA 68-C9-0013. San Francisco, California.

  • U.S. E.P.A., 1993. Permit Compliance System User Documentation Master Index. PCS-MA93-1.01. Washington, D.C.

  • Walker, J.D., 1995. Toxic substance control act (TSCA) interagency testing committee: Data developed under section 4 of TSCA. In: G.M. Rand (ed.), Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, 2nd edition. pp. 669–701. Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichert, G.A., 1995. Effects of improved sewage effluent management and urbanization on fish associations of Toronto streams. N. Amer. J. Fish. Mgt. 15: 440–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, C.O. & E.T. Rankin, 1995. Biological response signatures and the area of degradation value: new tools for interpreting multimetric data. In: W.S. Davis & T. Somon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making (Chapter 17). pp. 263–286. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dyer, S., White-Hull, C., Wang, X. et al. Determining the influence of habitat and chemical factors on instream biotic integrity for a Southern Ohio watershed. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 6, 91–110 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009957614818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009957614818

Navigation