Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Why the Practice of Medicine is Not a Phronetic Activity

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay argues that the practice ofmedicine is not a phronetic activity in theoriginal Aristotelian sense of that term. Jonsen andToulmin are two philosophers who have conflated thetechne of medicine with phronesis. Thisconflation ignores Aristotle's crucial distinctionbetween techne and phronesis and his useof the medical analogy. It is argued that medicalreasoning is similar to phronesis but does notexemplify it. Phronesis will not save thelife of medical ethics. The concept could be utilized as amoral prosthetic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

NOTES AND REFERENCES

  1. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral 0052easoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989: 14, 42–46, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jaeger W. Aristotle's use of medicine as a model of method in his ethics. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1957; LXXVII: 54–61; Seidler MJ. The medical paradigm in Aristotelian ethics. The Thomist, 1978; 42: 401–433.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonsen, Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry: 69, 37, 42.

  4. Beresford E. Can phronesis save the life of medical ethics? Theoretical Medicine, 1996; 17: 219.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger. Aristotle's use of medicine: 58.

  6. Hutchinson DS. Ethics. In: Barnes J, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beresford. Phronesis: 222.

  8. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Irwin T, tr. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1985: 1096a15–1097a10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.: 1097a15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.: 1094a1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.: 1096b10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.: 1097a10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchinson DS. Ethics: 205–206.

  14. Ibid.: 206.

  15. Aristotle. NE: 1140a10.

  16. Ibid.: 1140a5.

  17. Reeve CDC. Practices of Reason; Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992: 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Ross WD, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924: 1032a32-b10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aristotle. NE: 1094a10, 1144a5, 1145a10. Note that in 1094a10, Aristotle cites other examples of technai, e.g., boatbuilding and bridlemaking. In 1104a5 he cites navigation.

  20. Reeve. Practices of Reason: 83. See also Dunne J. Aristotle after Gadamer: an analysis of the distinction between the concepts of phronesis and techne. Irish Philosophical Journal, 1985; 2: 108; Guthrie WKC. A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. VI, Aristotle: An Encounter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981; reprint, 1993: 340; Hutchinson. Ethics: 206; Jaeger. Aristotle's use of medicine: 55; Seidler. The medical paradigm: 409–410.

  21. Aristotle. NE: 1140a25–30.

  22. Guthrie. Aristotle: 346.

  23. Aristotle. NE: 1140b5.

  24. Ibid.: 1140b20.

  25. Hutchinson. Ethics: 207.

  26. Ibid.: 213, 218. The moral virtues have been tabulated as means between the relevant vices. See Ross D. Aristotle. London: Methuen and Co., 1923; reprint 1974: 203.

  27. Jonsen, Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry: 37.

  28. Ibid.: 37.

  29. Toulmin S. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1982; 25: 743.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Beresford. Phronesis: 210.

  31. Jonsen, Toulmin. The Abuse of Casuistry: 42.

  32. Beresford. Phronesis: 219–220.

  33. Aristotle. NE: 1104a1–10. Cf. Jaeger. Aristotle's use of medicine: 56, 58.

  34. Seidler. The medical paradigm: 415–416, 419, 427, 423.

  35. Ibid.: 428.

  36. Hutchinson. Ethics: 207–208. See also Aristotle. NE: 1140a25–30.

  37. Guthrie. Aristotle: 348.

  38. Jaeger. Aristotle's use of medicine: 58–60.

  39. Dunne. Aristotle after Gadamer: 110–111.

  40. Ibid.: 110.

  41. Ibid.: 108–110. See Aristotle. NE: 1129a15–25, 1140b25.

  42. Hutchinson DS. The Virtues of Aristotle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986: 36–37.

  43. Aristotle. NE: 1129a15.

  44. Dunne. Aristotle after Gadamer: 112.

  45. See Irwin T's Glossary to the NE, s.v. “state” at 426 and phronesis (intelligence) at

  46. Hutchinson. Ethics: 214. See Aristotle. NE: 1143b25–30, 1144a10–35.

  47. Hutchinson. The Virtues of Aristotle: 90–91.

  48. Hutchinson. The Virtues of Aristotle: 37; Reeve. Practices of Reason: 95–96.

  49. Aristotle. NE: 1102a5, 1102a15–20.

  50. Dunne. Aristotle after Gadamer: 112.

  51. Beresford. Phronesis: 222.

  52. Hoeffler JM. Deathright: Culture, Medicine, Politics, and the Right to Die. San Francisco: Westview Press, 1994: 48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Programme in Philosophy, York University, 4700 Keele Street, North York, Ontario, Canada, M3J 1P3

    Duff Waring

Authors
  1. Duff Waring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waring, D. Why the Practice of Medicine is Not a Phronetic Activity. Theor Med Bioeth 21, 139–151 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009952831029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009952831029