Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of transgenic rice plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared rice transgenic plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated and particle bombardment transformation by carrying out molecular analyses of the T0, T1 and T2 transgenic plants. Oryza sativa japonica rice (c.v. Taipei 309) was transformed with a construct (pWNHG) that carried genes coding for neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII), hygromycin phosphotransferase (Hygr), and β-glucuronidase (GUS). Thirteen and fourteen transgenic lines produced via either method were selected and subjected to molecular analysis. Based on our data, we could draw the following conclusions. Average gene copy numbers of the three transgenes were 1.8 and 2.7 for transgenic plants obtained by Agrobacterium and by particle bombardment, respectively. The percentage of transgenic plants containing intact copies of foreign genes, especially non-selection genes, was higher for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. GUS gene expression level in transgenic plants obtained from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was more stable overall the transgenic plant lines obtained by particle bombardment. Most of the transgenic plants obtained from the two transformation systems gave a Mendelian segregation pattern of foreign genes in T1 and T2 generations. Co-segregation was observed for lines obtained from particle bombardment, however, that was not always the case for T1 lines obtained from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Fertility of transgenic plants obtained from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was better. In summary, the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is a good system to obtain transgenic plants with lower copy number, intact foreign gene and stable gene expression, while particle bombardment is a high efficiency system to produce large number of transgenic plants with a wide range of gene expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres N. and Park W. 1994. Genetic transformation of rice. Crit. Rev. Plants Sci. 13: 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan M., Chang H., Ho S., Tong W. and Yu S. 1993. Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric oc-amylase promoter/β-glucuronidase gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L., Zhang S., Beachy R.N. and Fauquet C.M. 1998a. A protocol for consistent, large scale production of fertile transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L., Marmey P., Taylor N., Brizard J-P., Espinoza C., D'Cruz P., Huet H., Zhang S., de Kochko A., Beachy R.N. and Fauquet C.M. 1998b. Expression and inheritance of multiple transgenes in rice plants. Nature Biotechnol. 16: 1060–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, Ford TL and Kofron M. 1991. Production of transgenic rice [Oryza sativa L.] plants from agronomically important indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/technology 9: 957–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P. 1997. Rice transformation: bombardment. Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neve M., De Buck S., Jacobs A., Van Montagu M. and Depicker A. 1997. T-DNA integration patterns in co-transformed plant cells suggest that T-DNA repeats originate from co-integration of separate T-DNAs. Plant J. 11: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean C., Jones J., Favreau M., Dunsmuir P. and hedbrook J. 1988. Influence of flanking sequences on variability in expression levels of an introduced gene in trangenic tobacco plants. Nucl. Acids Res. 16: 9267–9283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta S.L., Wood J. and Hicks J.B. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmayan T. and Vaucheret H. 1996. Expression of single copies of a strongly expressed 35s transgene can be silenced post-transcriptionally. Plant J. 9: 787–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell R.B. 1994. Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3490–3496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan J. and McElroy D. 1994. Transgene inactivation: plants fight back. Bio/technology 12: 883–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto F., Toki S. and Uchimiya H. 1993. Inheritance of a cotransferred foreign gene in progenies of transgenic rice plants. Transgenic Res. 2: 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi M.Z., McMullen M.D. and Finer J.J. 1996. Transformation of 12 different plasmids into soybean via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiei Y., Ohta S., Komari T. and Kumashiro T. 1994. Efficient transformation of rice [Oryza sativa L.] mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6: 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiei Y., Komari T. and Kubo T. 1997. Transformation of rice mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs S.L.A., Warkentin T.D. and DeLong C.M.O. 1993. Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 21: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema A., Hirsch P.R., Hooykaas P.J.J. and Schilperoort R.A. 1983. A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir and T-region of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature 303: 179–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias V.A., Moscone E.A., Papp I., Neuhuber F., Michalowski S., Phelan T., Spiker S., Matzke M. and Matzke A. 1997. Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of stably and unstably expressed transgene loci in tobacco. Plant Cell 9: 1251–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida Y., Saito H., Ohta S., Hiei Y., Komari T., Kumashiro T. 1996. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotechnol. 14: 745–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson R.A. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A., Leech M., Vain P., Laurie D.A. and Christou P. 1998. Transgene organization in rice engineered through direct DNA transfer supports a two-phase integration mechanism mediated by the establishment of integration hot spots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 7203–7208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komari T., Hiei Y., Saito Y., Murai N. and Kumashiro T. 1996. Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J. 10: 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononov M., Bassuner B. and Gelvin S. 1997. Integration of T-DNA binary vector ‘backbone’ sequences into the tobacco genome: evidence for multiple complex patterns of integration. Plant J. 11: 945–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L., Qu R., de Kochko A., Fauquet C.M. and Beachy R.N. 1993. An improved rice transformation system using the biolistic method. Plant Cell Rep. 12: 250–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy D., Zhang W., Wu R. 1990. Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation. Plant Cell 2: 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S.H., Pinson S.R.M. and Smith R. 1996. T-DNA integration into genomic DNA of rice following Agrobacterium inoculation of isolated shoot apices. Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 1135–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski W.P. and Somers D.A. 1996. Transgene inheritance in plants genetically engineered by microprojectile bombardment. Mol. Biotechnol. 6: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J., Wen F., Lister R.L. and Hodges T.K. 1995. Inheritance of gusA and neo genes in transgenic rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 27: 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid H., Yokoi S., Toriyama K. and Hinata K. 1996.Transgenic plant production mediated by Agrobacterium in Indica rice. Plant Cell Rep. 15: 727–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.H. and Hood E.H. 1995. Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation of monocotyledons. Crop Sci. 35: 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer T.M., O'Brien J.V., Start W.G., Adams T.R., Gordon-Kamn W.J. and Lemaux P.G. 1992. Segregation of transgenes in maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 18: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingay S., McElroy D., Kalla R., Fieg S., Wang M., Thornton S. and Brettell R. 1997. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. Plant J. 11: 1369–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck J.M., Blowers A.D. and Earle E.D. 1995. Stable transformation of tomato cell cultures after bombardment with plasmid and YAC DNA. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil I.K. 1994. Molecular improvement of cereals. Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaucheret H., Béclin C., Elmayan T., Feuerbach F., Godon C., Morel J.B., Mourrain P., Palauqui J.C. and Vernhettes S. 1998. Transgene-induced gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 16: 651–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S., Chen L., Qu R., Marmey P., Beachy R.N. and Fauquet C.M. 1996. Regeneration of fertile transgenic indica (group1) rice plants following microprojectile transformation of embryogenic suspension culture cells. plant Cell Rep. 15: 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H., Dai S., He S., Tian W. and Li L. 1996. Genetic transformation of indica rice using the biolistic method. Chin. J. Genet. 23: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, S., Zheng, P., Marmey, P. et al. Comparative analysis of transgenic rice plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment. Molecular Breeding 7, 25–33 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009687511633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009687511633

Navigation