Skip to main content
Log in

The nature of biodiversity in hypogean waters and how it is endangered

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The specialised aquatic hypogean, i.e. stygobiotic, fauna has been recognised in some regions moderately rich. Slovenia, the broader Dinaric region, and Europe are particularly rich with about 7–8% of all Metazoa and about 40% of Crustacea species being stygobionts. The hypogean biotic diversity is in general predominantly a crustacean diversity. The high number of stygobiont Crustacea–Malacostraca species can be explained by the near absence of Insecta as well as by their high endemicity and sometimes additional specialisation, i.e. the spatial and ecological partition of the environment by the species. Although one cave system may exceptionally shelter up to 40 stygobiont species, they are distributed there into separate associations. Among more than 2000 described stygobiontic Malacostraca species, which include close to 950 Amphipoda, the species numbers within some genera are very high (e.g. Niphargus with 275 spp.). With 10 orders represented the higher taxonomic diversity of stygobiont Malacostraca matches that of fresh waters or the sea. Comparison of some faunas shows that the limiting factors for biodiversity might be the lower ecological diversity of habitats and restricted food resources underground, both brought about to a high degree by the darkness and absence of plants. Being K-strategists, stygobionts are endangered by any sudden changes in their environment. In the case of an increased food input by modest organic pollution, they can be outcompeted by energetically demanding but competitively stronger recent immigrants from surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard JL and Barnard CM (1983) Freshwater Amphipoda of the world. Hayfield Associates, Mt Vernon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bole J, Drovenik B, Mršić N and Sket B (1993) Endemic animals in hypogean habitats in Slovenia. Naše Jame [Our Caves] 35(1): 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Botosaneanu L (ed) (1986) Stygofauna mundi. EJ Brill/Dr W Backhuys, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TE (1981) Thermosphaeroma milleri and T. smithi, new sphaeromatid isopod crustaceans from hot springs in Chihuahua, Mexico, with a review of the genus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 1(1): 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TE and Abele LG (1982) Classification of the recent Crustacea. In: Abele LG (ed) The Biologyof Crustacea 1: 1–27

  • Brancelj AS (1987) Cyclopoida and Calanoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) from the Postojna-Planina Cave System (Slovenia). Biološki Vestnik 35(1): 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca RC and Wilson GDF (1991) A phylogenetic analysis of the Isopoda with some classificatory recommendations. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 31: 143–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1991) A need for neeches? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6(1): 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Kane TC and Fong DW (1995) Adaptation and Natural Selection in Caves. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol D and Rouch R (1991) L'adaptation des organismes au milieu aquatique souterrain. Reflexions sur l'apport des recherches ecologiques recentes. Stygologia 6(3): 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Dercourt J, Zonenshain LP, Ricou L-E, Kazmin VG, Le Pichon X, Knipper AL, Grandjacquet C, Sbortshikov IM, Geyssant J, Lepvrier C, Pechersky DH, Boulin J, Sibuet J-C, Savostin LA, Sorokhtin O, Westphal M, Bazhenov ML, Lauer JP and Biju-Duval B (1986) Geological evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic to the Pamirs since the Lias. Tectonophysics 123: 241–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ and David R (1994) Hotspots across Europe. Biodiversity Letters 2: 108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimov IP, Baranov AN, Davitaia FF, Filippov YV, Budyko MI, Lavrenko EM, Muratov MV and Senderova GM (eds) (1964) Fiziko-geografičceskii atlas mira. Akad. Nauk and Gl. Upr. Geod. Kartogr. GGK SSSR, Moskva

  • Holsinger JR (1978) Systematic of the subterranean amphipod genus Stygobromus (Crangonyctidae), Part II: Species of the Eastern United States. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 266: 1–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth FG (1981) Non-relictual terrestrial troglobites in the tropical Hawaian caves. Proceedings of the eighth international Congress of Speleology, Bowling Green, pp 539–541

  • Illies J (ed) (1978) Limnofauna europaea, pp I–XVII, 1–532. Fischer G, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaman S (1931) 4. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Suesswasseramphipoden. Glasnik skopskog naučnog Društva 9: 93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaman G and Ruffo S (1986) Amphipoda: Niphargus-group (Niphargidae sensu Bousfield, 1982). In: Botosaneanu L (ed) Stygofauna mundi, pp 514–534

  • Karaman G (1993) Crustacea Amphipoda di acqua dolce. Fauna d'Italia. Edizione Calderini, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Reygrobellet J-L, Mathieu J and Lafont M (1994) The use of invertebrate communities to describe groundwater flow and contaminant transport in a fractured rock aquifer. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 131: 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Matvejev S (1961) Biogeografija Jugoslavije (Biogeography of Yugoslavia). Monographies 9, Biol Inst. Srbije NR, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  • Melik A (1958) Jugoslavija. Tiskovna zadruga, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Notenboom J (1988) Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the groundwater-dwelling amphipod genus Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea), with emphasis on the Iberian species. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 58(2): 159–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Notenboom J, Plenet S and Turquin MJ (1994) Groundwater contamination and its impact on groundwater animals and ecosystems. In: Gibert J, Danielopol DL and Stanford JA (eds) Groundwater Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak D (1992) Tominčev studenec pri Dvoru in njegovo zaledje [The spring of Tominec near Dvor and its tributary area]. Naše Jame [Our Caves] 34: 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak D (1993) Hydrogeological research of the Slovenian karst. Naše Jame [Our Caves] 35(1): 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck SB (1998) A summary of diversity and distribution of the obligate cave-inhabiting faunas of the United States and Canada. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 60(1): 18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelogović E, Arsovski M, Kranjec V, Radulović V, Sikošek B and Soklić S (1975) Paleogeografska evolucija teritorije Jugoslavije od tercijera do danas. Acta seismologica jugoslavica 2–3: 7–11, maps

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretner E (1963) Kako zaštititi pećinsku faunu Vjetrenice kod Zavale. III. jugoslavenski speleološki Kongres 169–174

  • Radovanović M(1932) Wormaldia subterranea n. sp. eine neue in den Hoehlen Jugoslawiens aufgefundene Trichopterenart. Zoologischer Anzeiger 100(3/4): 102–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid JW (1992) Taxonomic problems: a serious impediment to groundwater ecological research in North America. First international Conference for Ground Water Ecology 133–142

  • Roegl F and Steininger FF (1983) Vom Zerfall der Tethys zu Mediterran and Paratethys. Annales des naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 85/A, 135–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouch R and Danielopol DL (1997) Species richness of microcrustacea in subterranean freshwater habitats. Comparative analysis and approximate evaluation. Internationelle Revue fuer gesammte Hydrobiologie 82(2): 121–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouch R and Danielopol DL (1987) L'origine de la faune aquatique souterraine, entre le paradigme du refuge et le modele da la colonisation active. Stygologia 3(4): 345–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1972) Zaščita podzemeljske favne se ujema življenskimi interesi prebivalstva [Protection of subterranean life consonant with human interests]. In: Zelena knjiga [Green Book], pp 137–140, 164–165. PDS, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1964) Oestliche Gruppe der Monolistrini. I. Systematischer Teil. International Journal of Speleology 1(1–2): 163–189, tab. 22–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1969) Ueber einige mit der Evolution der Hohlentiere verbundene Probleme. Actes du IVe Congres international de Speleologie en Yougoslavie (1965) 4–5: 225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1970) Predhodno poročilo o ekoloških raziskavah v sistemu kraške Ljubljanice [Vorlaufige Mitteilung uber die okologischen Untersuchungen im System des Pivka-Flusses im Karste Sloweniens]. Biološki Vestnik 18: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1977) Gegenseitige Beeinflussung derWasserpollution und des Hohlenmilieus. Proceedings of the 6th international Congress of Speleology (Olomouc 1973) 5: 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1979) Jamska favna Notranjskega trikotnika (Cerknica – Postojna – Planina), njena ogroženost in naravovarstveni pomen [The cave fauna in the triangle Cerknica – Postojna – Planina / Slovenia /, its conservational importance]. Varstvo Narave, Ljubljana 12: 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1980) Bogastvo in ogroženost jamske favne v področju Popovega polja [The richness and threateness of the cave fauna in the Popovo polje region]. 7. jugoslavenski speleološki Kongres., Hercegnovi 1976: 403–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1981) Niphargobates orophobata n. g., n. sp. (Amphipoda, Gammaridae s.l.) from cave waters in Slovenia (NW Yugoslavia). Biološki Vestnik 29(1): 105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1985) Why all cave animals do not look alike – a discussion on adaptive value of reduction processes. NSS Bulletin 47(2): 78–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1986a) Evaluation of some taxonomically, zoogeographically, or ecologically interesting finds in the hypogean waters of Yugoslavia (in the last decades). Communications, 9. Congreso internacional de Espeleologia 1: 126–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1986b) O favni v Križni jami [Fauna of the cave Križna jama]. Notranjski Listi 3: 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1990) Is Niphargobates lefkodemonaki sp. n. (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Kriti (Greece) a zoogeographical enigma? Zoologische Jahrbuecher, Abteilung Systematik 117: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1992) Conservation of sites important for their hypogean aquatic fauna. A proposal Bulletin de la Liaison de la Societe de Biospeologie 19: 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1994) Distribution of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellidae) and its hypogean populations at different geographic scales, with a note on Proasellus istrianus. Hydrobiologia 287: 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1996a) Biotic diversity of hypogean habitats in Slovenia and its cultural importance. Biodiversity – International Biodiversity Seminar, UNESCO, Gozd Martuljek, Proceedings, pp 59–74

  • Sket B (1996b) The ecology of the anchihaline caves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(5): 221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1997a) Distribution of Proteus (Amphibia: Urodela: Proteidae) and its possible explanation. Journal of Biogeography 24: 263–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (1997b) The anchihaline habitats, a dispersed ‘center’ of biotic diversity. Conservation and Protection of the Biota of Karst, Karst Water Institute, Special Publication 3: 98–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B (in press) High biodiversity in hypogean waters and its endangerment – situation in Slovenia, Dinaric karst, and Europe. Crustaceana 72(8)

  • Sket B and Bole J (1982) Organisms as indicators of hypogean water connections. Naš Krš (Sarajevo) 6(12–13): 115–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B, Bole J, Benović A, Brancelj A, Brglez J, Čuček M, Ćurčić B, Jaklin A, Karaman G, Katavić I, Kerovec M, Kos I, Legac M, Mršić N, Malej A, Novak T, Petkovski S, Petkovski T, Polenec A, Potočnik F, Pujin V, Radujković B, Števčić Z, Tarman K, Travizi A, Velikonja M, Velkovrh F, Vidaković J and Zavodnik D (1991) Bogastvo in raziskanost jugoslovnske favne: nižji nevretenčarji (Metazoa Invertebrata, ex. Insecta) [Richness and state of knowledge of the fauna of Yugoslavia: lower invertebrates (Metazoa: Invertebrata, ex. Insecta)]. Biološki Vestnik 39(1–2): 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sket B and Velkovrh F (1981) Podzemeljske živali v termalnih vodah (Subterranean animals in thermal waters). Biološki Vestnik 29(2): 91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoch F (1995) The ecological and historical determinants of crustacean diversity in groundwaters, or: why are there so many species? Memoires de Biospeologie 22: 139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock J (1977) The taxonomy and zoogeography of the hadziid Amphipoda with emphasis on the West Indian taxa. Studies of the Fauna of Curacao and other Caribbean Islands 55: 1–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Prevorčnik S and Blejec A (1998) Asellus aquaticus infernus, new subspecies (Isopoda: Asellota: Asellidae), from Romanian hypogean waters. Journal of Crustacean Biology 18(4): 763–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandel A (1964) Biospeologie – la biologie des animaux cavernicoles. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV and Voelz NJ (1998) Altitudinal distribution patterns of surfacewater and groundwater faunas. In: Bretschko G and Helešic J (eds) Advances in River Bottom Ecology, pp 135–142

  • Wicksten MK (1996) Parhippolyte cavernicola, new species (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) from the tropical eastern Pacific, with taxonomic remarks on the genera Somersiella and Koror. Journal of Crustacean Biology 16(1): 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wraber M (1969) Pflanzengeographische Stellung und Gliederung Sloweniens. Vegetatio 17: 176–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sket, B. The nature of biodiversity in hypogean waters and how it is endangered. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1319–1338 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008916601121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008916601121

Navigation