Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric properties of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 system in paediatric oncology patients

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the reliability and validity of the Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark 2 system, a health-related quality of life (QoL) instrument, in children with cancer. The sample consisted of 61 mothers of paediatric oncology patients, aged 4.1–17.3 years, who were either on treatment (n = 20) or off treatment (n = 41). The test-retest reliability was very good for the HUI Mark 2 system global score and all of its dimensions except pain. The HUI Mark 2 dimensions of emotion, pain and self-care as well as its overall score showed moderate convergent validity with other measures. In addition, the HUI Mark 2 system demonstrated good discriminant validity. However, the content validity of the HUI Mark 2 system when considered as a multiattribute descriptive health profile is questionable because it fails to assess domains such as neuropsychological and psychosocial functioning. Overall, the results indicate that the HUI Mark 2 system is reliable and valid as a measure of health-related QoL for paediatric oncology patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradlyn AS, Harris CV, Warner JE, Ritchey AK, Zaboy K. An investigation of the validity of the quality of well-being scale with paediatric oncology patients. Health Psychol 1993; 12(3): 246-250.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koocher GP. Surviving childhood cancer: issues in living. In: Spinetta JJ, Deasy-Spinetta P, eds. Living with Childhood Cancer. St Louis, MO: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1981: 171-183.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ekert H. Childhood Cancer: Understanding and Coping. Philadelphia, PA: Gordon & Breach Sciences Publishers 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams DW, Deveau EJ. Coping with Childhood Cancer: Where do we go from here? Hamilton, Ontario: Kinbridge Publications, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mulhern RK, Ochs J, Armstrong FD et al. Assessment of quality of life among paediatric patients with cancer. Psychol Assess: J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 1(2): 130-138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gamis AS, Nesbit ME. Neuropsychologic (cognitive) disabilities in long-term survivors of childhood of cancer. Paediatrician 1991; 18: 11-19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peckham VC. Educational deficits in survivors of childhood cancer. Paediatrician 1991; 18: 25-31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Von der Weid N, Beck D. Séquelles tardives d'un groupe d'enfants et d'adolescents traités pour cancer entre 1981 et 1986 en Suisse. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1993; 123(25): 1293-1299.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson V, Smibert E, Ekert H, Godber T. Intellectual, educational and behavioural sequelae after cranial irradiation and chemotherapy. Arch of Dis Childhood 1994; 70: 476-483.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenney MEM, Kane RL, Lurie N. Developing a measure of health outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer: a review of the issues. Med Paediatr Oncol 1995; 24: 145-153.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mackworth N, Fobair P, Prados MD. Quality of life self-reports from 200 brain tumour patients: comparisons with Karnofsky performance scores. J Neuro-Oncol 1992; 14: 243-253.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cella DF, Tulsky DS. Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose and method of measurement. Cancer Invest 1993; 11(3): 327-336.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinds PS. Quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer. Sem Oncol Nursing 1990; 6(4): 285-291.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boggs SR, Graham-Pole J, Miller EM. Life-threatening illness and invasive treatment: the future of quality of life assessment and research in paediatric oncology. In: Johnson JH, Johnson SB, eds. Advances in Child Health Psychology. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1991: 353-361.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trudel JG, Dobkin PL, Rivard M, Robaey P. Psychometric properties of the Health Utilities Index with paediatric oncology patients. Qual Life Res 1995; 4(5): 496-497.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lansky SB, List MA, Lansky LL, Ritter-Sterr C, Miller DR. The measurement of performance in childhood cancer patients. Cancer 1987; 60: 1651-1656.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mulhern RK, Fairclough DL, Friedman AG, Leigh LD. Play Performance Scale as an index of quality of life of childhood with cancer. Psychol Assess: J Consult Clin Psychol 1990; 2(2): 149-155.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1990: 131-149.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eiser C, Havermans T, Craft A, Kernahan J. Development of a measure to assess the perceived illness experience after treatment for cancer. Arch Dis Childhood 1995; 72: 302-307.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goodwin DAJ, Boggs SR, Graham-Pole J. Development and validation of the paediatric oncology quality of life scale. Psychol Assess 1994; 6(4): 321-328.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(6): 923-928.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barr RD, Pai MK, R, Weitzman S et al. A multi-attribute approach to health status measurement and clinical management-illustrated by an application to brain tumours in childhood. Int J Oncol 1994; 4: 639-648.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barr RD, Furlong W, Dawson S et al. An assessment of global health status in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood. Am J Paediatr Hematol/ Oncol 1993; 15(4): 284-290.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barr RD, Feeny D, Furlong W, Weitzman S, Torrance GW. A preference-based approach to health-related quality of life for children with cancer. Int J Paediatr Hematol/Oncol 1995; 2: 305-315.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feeny D, Leiper A, Barr RD et al. The comprehensive assessment of health status in survivors of childhood cancer: application to high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Cancer 1993; 67: 1047-1052.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Santé Canada. Mon Combat pour la Vie: Le Cancer chez les Enfants et les Adolescents. Ottawa: Approvisionnements et Services Canada, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lorr M, NcNair D. Profile of Mood States: Bi-polar Form (POMS-B1). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7(6): 503-520.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hauser ST. The study of families and chronic illness: ways of coping and interacting. In: Brody GH, Siegel IE, eds. Methods of Family Research: Biographies of Research Projects: Vol. 2. Clinical Populations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990: 59-86.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Hatcher J. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index-Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey health questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1995; 4(3): 249-257.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chang P-N. Psychosocial needs of long-term childhood cancer survivors: a review of literature. Paediatrician 1991; 18: 20-24.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sanger MS, Copeland DR, Davidson ER. Psychosocial adjustment among paediatric cancer patients: a multidimensional assessment. J Paediatr Psychol 1991; 16(4): 463-474.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45(7): 743-760.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(6): 593-600.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M. Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7(6): 490-502.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cassidy J. Child-Mother attachment and the self in six-year-olds. Child Devel 1988; 59: 121-134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trudel, J.G., Rivard, M., Dobkin, P.L. et al. Psychometric properties of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 system in paediatric oncology patients. Qual Life Res 7, 421–432 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857920624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008857920624

Navigation