Skip to main content
Log in

Epidemiology of blood collection in France

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of the cross-sectional study (EpiCoS) were to describe, at different stages, volunteers offering their blood, and to characterize various ways of collecting blood. From 15 September 1996 to 31 December 1996, individuals presenting at fixed or mobile sessions in one of 11 randomly selected blood banks were included after they had a medical examination. Variables studied were relative to type of collection, individuals, medical examination, patterns of blood letting, use of collected donations and if unused, reasons for discarding. Sixty four thousand and ninety two volunteers, aged 17–66 years old were included. The proportion of exclusion during medical examination was 10.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.6–11.0%). Exclusions were more frequent among new volunteers and were mostly related to the safety of recipients. Most of the 57,003 donations were whole blood (94.0%) and collected in mobile sessions (89.9%). Five percent of collected donations were discarded; 3.5% (95% CI: 3.4–3.7%) of donations discarded for biological abnormalities, including 1.5% only for initial screen reactions to infectious disease markers (HBs antigen, anti-HBc antibodies, anti-HCV antibodies, anti-HIV antibodies, anti-HTLV antibodies, malaria antibodies and anti-syphilitic antibodies). The most frequent biological abnormality was a high alanine aminotransferase level. A follow-up of these indicators, within the French haemovigilance system, should allow further identification of risk factors and high-risk contexts, and planning means of optimizing blood collection in France.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agence française du sang. Rapport sur l'activité de transfusion sanguine. Cahier statistique 1996. Paris: La Documentation française, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sandborg E, Thornton M. Donor recruitment. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 5): 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson A. What happens to donated blood? Can Med Assoc J 1995; 152: 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sloand E, Pitt E, Klein H. Safety of blood supply. JAMA 1995; 274: 1368–1373.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sazama K. Current good manufacturing practices for transfusion medicine. Transfus Med Rev 1996; 10: 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stivala J, Wagstaff W. Quality assurance in blood transfusion. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 5): 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reesink H, Dodd R, Leikola J, et al. How far shall we go in the predonation selection of blood donors to safeguard patients for blood-transfusion-related infections? [editorial]. Vox Sang 1993; 65: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt P, Barbara J, Contreras M. Donor selection and microbial screening. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 5): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woodfield G. Predonation screening and pretransfusion testing. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 5): 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loos J. The quality of blood starts with its collection. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 3): 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McClelland D, McMenamin J, Moores N, et al. Reducing risks in blood transfusion: Process and outcome. Transfus Med 1996; 6: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sandler S. Recruitment and management of donors. A perspective from the United States. Vox Sang 1994; 67(Suppl. 3): 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministère de la santé. Arrêté du 22 septembre 1993 portant homologation du règlement de l'Agence française du sang relatif aux bonnes pratiques de prélèvement et pris en application de l'article L. 668–3 du code de la santé publique. J O République Fr 1993: 13993–14000.

  14. Lemeshow S, Hosmer D Jr, Klar J, Lwanga S. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. (World health organization ed.) New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salmi LR, Hervé P. L'organisation de l'hémovigilance en France. Transfus Clin Biol 1994; 3: 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dean A, Dean J, Coulombier D, et al. A word processing, database, and statistics program for public health on microcomputers. Epi Info 6.02. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rothman K. Modern epidemiology. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. EGRET statistical software. Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation. Seattle, 1993.

  19. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lightman E. Women and voluntary blood donation. J Sociol Soc Welfare 1982; 9: 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Agence française du sang. Rapport sur l'activité de transfusion sanguine. Juillet 1995–juillet 1996. Paris: La Documentation française, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saura C, Pillonel J, Couroucé AM. Dépistage des marqueurs des infections transmissibles par le sang sur les dons de sang collectés en France de 1993 à 1995. Transfus Clin Biol 1997; 4: 403–415.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaudhary R, Gupta D, Gupta R. Analysis of donor-deferral pattern in a voluntary blood donor population. Transfus Med 1995; 5: 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galea G, Gillon J, Urbaniak S. Study on medical donor deferrals at sessions. Transfus Med 1996; 6: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon T, Rhyne R, Wayne S, et al. Characteristics of elderly blood donors. Transfusion 1991; 31: 693–697.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tomasulo P, Anderson A, Paluso M, et al. A study of criteria for blood donor deferral. Transfusion 1980; 20: 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lim J. Main causes of pre-donation deferral of prospective blood donors in the Singapore blood transfusion service. Ann Acad Med 1993; 22: 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zuck TF, Thomson RA, Schreiber GB, et al. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS): Rationale and methods. Transfusion 1995; 35: 944–951.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pillonel J, Lemaire J, Couroucé A. Epidémiologie de l'HTLV chez les donneurs de sang. Transfus Clin Biol 1994; 1: 51–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawson-Ayayi, S., Salmi, L. Epidemiology of blood collection in France. Eur J Epidemiol 15, 285–292 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594716912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007594716912

Navigation