Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Anisotropy Computations

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most descriptions of anisotropy make reference to reduced distances and conversion of anisotropic models to isotropic counterparts and equations are presented for a certain class of range-anisotropic models. Many descriptions state that sill anisotropy is modelled using a range-anisotropic structure having a very elongated ellipse. The presentations typically have few or no intervening steps. Students and applied researchers rarely follow these presentations and subsequently regard the programs that compute anisotropic variograms as black-boxes, the contents of which are too complex to try to understand. We provide the geometry necessary to clarify those computations. In so doing, we provide a general way to model any type of anisotropy (range, sill, power, slope, nugget) on an ellipse. We note cases in the literature in which the printed descriptions of anisotropy on an ellipse do not match the stated or coded models. An example is provided in which both range- and sill-anisotropic structures are fitted to the experimental variogram values from an elevation data set using the provided equations and weighted nonlinear regression. The original variogram values are plotted with the fitted surfaces to view the fit and anisotropic structure in many directions at once.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Clark, I., 1980, Part 2: The semivarigram, in Royle, A., Clark, I., Brooker, P. I., Parker, H., Journel, A., Rendu, J. M., Sandefur, R., Grant, D. C., and Mousset Jones, P., Geostatistics: McGraw Hill, New York, p. 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1985, Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares: Math. Geology, v. 17, no. 5, p. 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1989, Geostatistics: Am. Statistician, v. 43, no. 4, p. 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1991, Statistics for Spatial Data: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1998, GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide: 2nd Ed.: Oxford University Press, New York, 369 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P., 1997, Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation: Oxford University Press, New York, 483 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M., 1989, An introduction to applied statistics: Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, New York, 600 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A. B., and Webster, R., 1986, Choosing functions for semi-variograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates: Jour. Soil Sci., v. 37, no. 4, p. 617–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. C., 1997, Geostatistical error management: Quantifying uncertainty for environmental sampling and mapping: Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 571 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannatier, Y., 1996, VARIOWIN software for spatial data analysis in 2D: Springer-Verlag, New York, 91 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchia, A. V., 1988, Estimation and model identification for continuous spatial processes: Jour. Royal Stat. Assoc., Series B, v. 50, no. 2, p. 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. L., 1993, Another look at anisotropy in geostatistcs: Math. Geology, v. 25, no. 4, p. 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eriksson, M., Siska, P.P. Understanding Anisotropy Computations. Mathematical Geology 32, 683–700 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007590322263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007590322263

Navigation