Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Science Approaches To Understanding Diagrammatic Representations

Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a wide variety of approaches cognitive sciencehas given us various important insights into thenature of diagrammatic representations. This papersurveys the findings, issues and approaches todiagrammatic representations in cognitive science. Important current issues that are highlighted include:the relation between the parts of the representationalsystem that are internal to the mind and in externalvisual media that presents the diagram; the use ofmultiple representations which is typical of realcontexts of diagram use; the benefits of diagrams interms of (i) computational offloading, (ii)re-representation and (iii) graphical constraining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng, P.C.-H. (1996). Functional Roles for the Cognitive Analysis of Diagrams in Problem Solving. In Cottrell, G.W. (ed.) Proceeding of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 207–212. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.C.-H. & Simon, H.A. (1995). Scientific Discovery and Creative Reasoning with Diagrams. In Smith, S., Ward, T. & Finke, R. (eds.) The Creative Cognition Approach, 205–228. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D.E. & Schwartz, B.J. (1979). Chunking in Recall of Symbolic Drawings. Memory and Cognition 7(2): 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T.G.R. & Petre, M. (1996). Usability Analysis Of Visual Programming Environments-A Cognitive Dimensions Framework. Journal of Visual Languages And Computing 7: 131–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K.R. & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract Planning and Perceptual Chunks: Elements of Expertise in Geometry. Cognitive Science 14: 511–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J.H. (1989). Display-Based Problem Solving. In Klahr. D. & Kotovsky, K. (eds.) Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon 319–341. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11(1): 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopuck, L. (1996). Designing Multimedia. Peachpit Press: Berkley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R.K. (1993). Constructing a Mental Representation from an Abstract Technical Diagram. Learning and Instruction 3(3): 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R.K. (1994). Selectivity in Diagrams: Reading Beyond the Lines. Educational Psychology 14: 467–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R.K. (1996). Background Knowledge and the Construction of a Situational Representation from a Diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education 11: 377–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R.K. (1997, August). Effects of Interactive Animation in Complex Visual Learning. Paper Presented at the Seventh European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. Athens, Greece.

  • Lowe, R.K. (in press). Domain-Specific Constraints on Conceptual Change in Knowledge Acquisition from Diagram. In Vosniadou, S., Carretero, P. & Schnotz, W. (eds.) New Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Erlbaum.

  • Lopuck, L. (1996). Designing Multimedia. Peachpit Press: Berkley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1993). Cognition in the Head and in the World. Cognitive Science 17(1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S.E. (1977). Hierarchical Structure in Perceptual Representation. Cognitive Psychology 9: 441–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D. (1987). External Representations and the Advantages of Externalizing One's Thoughts. Proceedings of the IX Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Seattle, WA/Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y. & Scaife, M. (1999). How can Interactive Multimedia Facilitate Learning? Proceedings of First International Workshop on Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces. Menlo Park, Ca: AAAI Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996). External Cognition: how Do Graphical Representations Work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45: 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K. (1999). Distinguishing Semantic from Processing Explanations of the Usability of Representations: Applying Expressiveness Analysis to Animation. Proceedings of First International Workshop on Intelligence And Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K. & Lemon, O. (1997). Diagrams and Human Reasoning: Aligning Logical and Psychological Perspectives. Position paper for ‘Thinking With Diagrams II’ Conference, University of Portsmouth, January.

  • Stenning, K. & Oberlander, J. (1995). A Cognitive Theory of Graphical and Linguistic Reasoning: Logic and Implementation, Cognitive Science 19: 97–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachneck, H.J.M., Leonardo, A.M. & Simon, H.A. (1994). How Does an Expert Use a Graph? A Model of Visual and Verbal Inferencing in Economics. In Ram, A. & Eiselt, K. (eds), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 842–847. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera, A.H. & Simon, H.A. (1993). Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation. Cognitive Science 17(1): 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1997). The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving. Cognitive Science 21(2): 179–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in Distributed Cognition Tasks. Cognitive Science 18(1): 87–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, P.CH., Lowe, R.K. & Scaife, M. Cognitive Science Approaches To Understanding Diagrammatic Representations. Artificial Intelligence Review 15, 79–94 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006641024593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006641024593

Navigation