Skip to main content
Log in

Use of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) to determine ploidy of in vitro watermelon shoots

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ploidy of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai shoots and plantlets was estimated by painting the lower epidermis of intact in vitro-derived leaves with fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and observing fluorescence of guard cell chloroplasts with a microscope and UV light. Leaves from in vitro shoot-tip cultures of known diploid cultivars and tetraploid breeding lines were used to establish the mean number of chloroplasts per guard cell pair. Leaves from diploid and tetraploid shoot cultures had 9.7 and 17.8 chloroplasts per guard cell pair, respectively. This method then was used to estimate the ploidy of shoots regenerated from cotyledon explants of the diploid cultivar Minilee. Approximately 11% of the 188 regenerated shoots were classified as tetraploid during in vitro culture. Putative tetraploids were transplanted to the field and self-pollinated. About 45% of tetraploids identified in vitro produced fruit and viable seed. Chloroplast counts of R1 progeny were used to confirm their ploidy. All of the putative diploids were confirmed diploid and all putative tetraploids proved to be non-chimeric true breeding tetraploids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus CF, Seshadri VS & Grimball PC (1971) Production of seedless watermelons. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1425

  • Compton ME & Gray DJ (1992) Micropropagation as a means of rapidly propagating triploid and tetraploid watermelon. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 105: 352-354

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton ME & Gray DJ (1993) Shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from cotyledons of diploid, triploid and tetraploid watermelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118: 151-157

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton ME, Gray DJ & Elmstrom GW (1993) A simple method for micropropagating diploid and tetraploid watermelon using shoot-tip explants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 33: 211-217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton ME, Gray DJ & Elmstrom GW (1996) Identification of tetraploid regenerants from cotyledons of diploid watermelon cultured in vitro. Euphytica 87: 165-172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DJ & Elmstrom GW (1991) Process for the accelerated production of triploid seeds for seedless watermelon cultivars. United States Patent No. 5,007,198

  • Kihara H (1951) Triploid watermelons. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 58: 217-230

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr CW & Gast KLB (1991) Reactions by consumers in a 'farmers' market to prices for seedless watermelon and ratings of eating quality. HortTechnol. 1: 105-106

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuistion G & Elmstrom GW (1993) Identifying polyploids of various cucurbits. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 106: 155-157

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr HC (1986) Watermelon breeding. In: Bassett, M (ed). Breeding Vegetable Crops (pp 37-66). AVI Publ. Co., Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Singsit C & Ozias-Akins P (1992) Rapid estimation of ploidy levels in in vitro-regenerated interspecific Arachis hybrids and fertile triploids. Euphytica 64: 183-188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singsit C & Veilleux RE (1991) Chloroplast density in guard cells of leaves of anther-derived potato plants grown in vitro and in vivo. HortSci. 26: 592-594

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Compton, M.E., Barnett, N. & Gray, D. Use of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) to determine ploidy of in vitro watermelon shoots. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 58, 199–203 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006371516394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006371516394

Navigation