Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Risk Appraisal: A New Look at Risk Assessment in Different Countries

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines perceived risk data from the U.S., China, Japan, and South Korea. These data are then compared with similar results collected from previous studies. Psychometric scaling scores from Burkino Faso (a West African Country), France, Norway, and Hungary have been analyzed and compared with results from our study. The data reveal certain risk events like nuclear weapons, war, and AIDS to have high perceived risks in all countries. These data also show that many of the events have dissimilar perceived risks in different countries. The conclusions also show some countries have higher over all levels of perceive risk (South Korea) while others like the United States display generally lower values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alhakami, A. S. and Slovic, P.: 1994, ‘A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit’, Risk Analysis 14(6), 1085–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman, W. F.: 1985, ‘Staying alive in the 20th Century’, Science 85, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabie, P. and Maschmeyer, C.: 1988, ‘Some current models for the perception and judgment of risk’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41, 300–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. and Arabie, P.: 1980, ‘Multidimensional Scaling’, inM. R. Rosenzweig and I.W. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Palo Alto, Annual Reviews 31, pp.607–49.

  • Chaudhuri, A.: 1997, ‘Consumption emotion and perceived risk: A macro-analytic approach’, Journal of Business Research 39(2), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. and Komorita S. S.: 1958, ‘Measuring utility of money through decision’, American Journal of Psychology 71, 383–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, G. and Earle, T.: 1985, ‘Classifying hazardous events’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 5(1), 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R.: 1994, ‘A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity’, Journal of Consumer Research 21(1), 119–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englander, T., Farago, K., Slovic, P. and Fischhoff, B.: 1986, ‘A comparative analysis of risk perception in Hungary and the United States’, Social Behaviour 1, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., Reicher, S. D. and Podpadec, T. J.: 1994, ‘Awareness of bad news, environmental attitudes, and subjective estimates of coastal pollution’, Risk Analysis 14(6), 945–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B.: 1978, ‘How save is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits’, Policy Sciences 9(2), 127–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Watson, S. R. and Hope, C.: 1984, ‘Defining risk’, Policy Science 17(2), 123–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goszczynska, M., Tyszka, T. and Slovic, P.: 1991, ‘Risk perception in Poland: A comparison with three countries’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 4(3), 179–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hance, B. J., Chess, C. and Sandman, P. M.: 1988, ‘Setting a context for explaining risk’, Risk Analysis 9(1), 113–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O.: 1989, ‘Dimensions of risk’, Risk Analysis 9(1), 107–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonowski, M.: 1994, ‘Words or numbers?’, Risk Management 42(3), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S.: 1993, ‘Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis’, Risk Analysis 13(2), 123–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, H. and Bassett, G. W.: 1994, ‘Perceived risk and uncertainty of nuclear waste: Differences among science, business, and environmental group members’, Risk Analysis 14(5), 851–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J. and Tversky, A.: 1984, ‘Representations of perceptions of risks’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowicz-Lazreg, C. and Mullet, E.: 1993, ‘Societal risk as seen by the French public’, Risk Analysis 13(3), 253–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X. and Ratick, S.: 1988, ‘The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework’, Risk Analysis 8(2), 177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keown, C. F.: 1989, ‘Risk perceptions of Hong Kong vs. Americans’, Risk Analysis 9(3), 401–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhesselink, R. R. and Rosa, E. A.: 1991, ‘Cognitive representation on risk perceptions: A comparison of Japan and the United States’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22(1), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kone, D. and Mullet, E.: 1994, ‘Societal risk perception and media coverage’, Risk Analysis 14(1), 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, H. and Vlek, C.: 1984, ‘Contrasting risk judgments among interest groups’, Acta Psychologica 56, 205–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. B.: 1995, ‘Assessing risk systematically’, Risk Management 42(1), 12–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. and Chang, S.-J.: 1994, ‘Representations of risk judgments’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57(2), 167–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. and Nogee, P.: 1951, ‘An experimental measurement of utility’, Journal of Political Economy 59(5), 371–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T. and McCallum, D. B.: 1997, ‘The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study’, Risk Analysis 17(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roundtree, P. W. and Land, K. C.: 1996, ‘Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data’, Social Forces 74(4), 1353–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settembrind, F.: 1994, ‘Risk management in enterprise: A systemic approach’, Risk Management 42(3), 34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, P. S. and Myers, M. F.: 1994, ‘Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980–1989: Analysis and recommendations’, Risk Analysis 14(2), 164–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P.: 1986, ‘Informing and educating the public about risk’, Risk Analysis 6(4), 403–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P.: 1987, ‘Perception of risk’, Science 236, 280–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S.: 1980, ‘Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk’, in R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers, Jr. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?, New York, Plenum Press, pp. 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P.: 1984, ‘Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety’, Acta Psychologica 56, 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P.: 1985, ‘Characterizing Perceived Risk’, in R. Kates, C. Hohenemser and J. Kasperson (eds.), Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, Boulder CO, Westview Press, pp. 91–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, K. H., Brun, W. and Slovic, P.: 1988, ‘Societal risk as seen by a Norwegian public’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1(2), 111–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C. and Stallen, P.-J.: 1980, ‘Rational and personal aspects of risk’, Acta Psychologica 45, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C. and Stallen, P.-J.: 1981, ‘Judging risks and benefits in the small and the large’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28(2), 235–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U. and Milliman, R. A.: 1997, ‘Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice’, Management Science 43(2), 123–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., Brouthers, L. E. and Brouthers, K. D.: 1996, ‘International risk and perceived environmental uncertainty: The dimensionality and internal consistency of Miller's measure’, Journal of International Business Studies 27(3), 571-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J.: 1994, ‘Environmental hazards in the Chinese public's eyes’, Risk Analysis 13(5), 509–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Jacobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, L., Worthley, R. A Comparative Study of Risk Appraisal: A New Look at Risk Assessment in Different Countries. Environ Monit Assess 59, 225–247 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006163606270

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006163606270

Navigation