Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Review. When to leave the brood chamber? Routes of dispersal in mites associated with burying beetles

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most nests of brood-caring insects are colonized by a rich community of mite species. Since these nests are ephemeral and scattered in space, phoresy is the principal mode of dispersal in mites specializing on insect nests. Often the mites will arrive on the nest-founding insect, reproduce in the nest and their offspring will disperse on the insect's offspring. A literature review shows that mites reproducing in the underground brood chambers of burying beetles use alternative routes for dispersal. For example, the phoretic instars of Poecilochirus spp. (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) disperse early by attaching to the parent beetles. Outside the brood chamber, the mites switch host at carcasses and pheromone-emitting male beetles, where juvenile and mature burying beetles of several species congregate. Because they preferably switch to beetles that are reproductively active and use all species of burying beetles within their ranges, they have a good chance of arriving in a new brood chamber. Other mite associates of burying beetles (Alliphis necrophilus and Uropodina) disperse from the brood chamber on the beetle offspring. We suggest that these mites forgo the possible time gain of dispersing early on the parent beetles because their mode of attachment precludes host switching. Their phoretic instars, once attached, have to stay on their host and so only dispersing on the beetle offspring guarantees that they are present on reproducing burying beetles of the next season. The mites associated with burying beetles providean example of multiple solutions to one life history problem – how to find a new brood chamber for reproduction. Mites that have mobile phoretic instars disperse on the parent beetles and try to arrive in the next brood chamber by host switching. They are independent of the generation cycle of a single host and several generations of mites per host generation are possible. Mites that are constrained by their mode of attachment disperse on the beetle offspring and wait until their host becomes mature and reproduces. By doing this they synchronize their generation time with the generation time of their host species. Exp Appl Acarol 22: 621–631 © 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ambros, M. 1995. Milben an Kleinsäugern in Österreich. Berichte des naturwissenschaftlichmedizinischen Vereins Innsbruck 82: 111-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athias-Binche, F., Schwarz, H.H. and Meierhofer, I. 1993. Phoretic association of Neoseius novus(Ouds., 1902) (Acari: Uropodina) with Nicrophorusspp. (Coleoptera: Silphidae): a case of sympatric speciation? Int. J. Acarol. 19: 75-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A.S. and Schwarz, H.H. 1997. Morphological differences between sympatric populations of the Poecilochirus carabicomplex (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) associated with burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus). Systematic Parasitology 37: 179-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beninger, C.W. 1993. Egg predation by Poecilochirus carabi(Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) and its effects on reproduction of Nicrophorus vespilloides(Coleoptera: Silphidae). Environ. Entomol. 22: 766-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.M. and Wilson, D.S. 1992. Local specialization of phoretic mites on sympatric carrion beetle hosts. Ecology 73: 463-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.M. and Wilson, D.S. 1994. Poecilochirus carabi: behavioral and life-history adaptations to different hosts and the consequences of geographical shifts in host communities. In Mites: ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns, M.A. Houck (ed.), pp. 1-22. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, J.E. 1981. Mites associated with British burying beetles (Coleoptera, Silphidae). PhD thesis, University of Leeds.

  • Christie, J.E. 1983. A new species of Alliphis(Mesostigmata: Eviphididae) from Britain. Acarologia 24: 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D.H. and Tompkins, D.M. 1994. Ectoparasite virulence is linked to mode of transmission. Proc. R. Soc. London B 256: 211-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, M. 1969. The association between mesostigmatic mites and coprid beetles. Acarologia 11: 411-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A.-K. 1992. Alternative male mate-finding tactics in burying beetles. Behav. Ecol. 3: 243-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A.-K. and Müller, J.K. 1992. Joint breeding in female burying beetles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 237-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort, G.C. 1990. Associations of mites with social insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 35: 469-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort, G.C. 1994. Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In Mites: ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns, M.A. Houch, pp. 218-251. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, P.W. 1983. Host-Parasite relations, vectors, and the evolution of disease severity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 14: 465-485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faasch, H. 1967. Beitrag zur Biologie der einheimischen Uropodiden Uroobovella marginata(C. L. Koch 1839) und Uropoda orbicularis(O. F. Müller 1776) und experimentelle Analyse ihres Phoresieverhaltens. Zool. Jahrbücher System. 94: 521-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haitlinger, R. 1976. Parasitological investigation of small mammals of Góry Sowie (Middle Sudetes). IV. Acarina (Mesostigmata). Polskie Pismo Entomol. 46: 771-821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haitlinger, R. 1990. Mites (Acari) ocurring on Geotrupes vernalis(L., 1758) (Insecta, Scarabaeidae) in Poland. Wladomosci Parazytol. 36: 137-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M.A. and O'Connor, B.M. 1991. Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 36: 611-636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, P.E. and Rosario, R.M.T. 1988. Associations of Mesostigmata with other arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 33: 393-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, K.H. 1980. Mites of the subfamily Parasitinae (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) in the British Isles. Bull. Br. Museum Nat. History (Zool. Ser.) 38: 237-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, K.H. 1990. Mites associated with terrestrial beetles in the British Isles. Entomol. Monthly Mag. 126: 133-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, K.H. and Emberson, R.M. 1988. A review of the Macrochelidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of the British Isles. Bull. Br. Museum Nat. History (Zool. Ser.) 54: 63-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, W. 1982a. Beiträge zur postembryonalen Entwicklung von Poecilochirus carabiG. u. R. Canestrini 1882 und P. austroasiaticusVitzthum 1930 (Acarina, Gamasina). Jahrbücher der Coburger Landesstiftung 27: 239-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, W. 1982b. Zur Fortpflanzung von Poecilochirus carabiG. u. R. Canestrini 1882 (syn. P. necrophoriVitzt.) und P. austroasiaticusVitzthum 1930 (Gamasina, Eugamasidae). Spixiana (Muench) 5: 261-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, W. 1983. Zur Vergesellschaftung der Gamasidenarten Poecilochirus carabiG. u. R. Canestrini 1882 ( = P. necrophoriVitzthum 1930), P. austroasiaticusVitzthum 1930 und P. subterraneusMüller 1859 mit Aaskäfern aus der Familie der Silphidae. Spixiana (Muench) 6: 251-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masan, P. 1994. The eviphidid mites (Acarina: Mesostigmata: Eviphididae) associated with scarabaeid and carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Silphidae) in central Europe. Acarologia 35: 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micherdzinski, W. 1969. Die Familie Parasitidae Oudemans 1901 (Acarina, Mesostigmata). Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, L.J. and Milne, M. 1976. The social behavior of burying beetles. Sci. Am. 235 (2): 84-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.K. and Eggert, A.-K. 1987. Effects of carrion-independent pheromone emission by male burying beetles (Silphidae: Necrophorus). Ethology 76: 297-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olynyk, J.E. and Freitag, R. 1979. Some phoretic associations of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and mites (Acarina). Can. Entomol. 111: 333-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S.B. and Kaulbars, M.M. 1987. A synopsis of the distribution and bionomics of the carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) of the conterminous United States. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario 118: 47-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukowski, E. 1933. Ökologische Untersuchungen an NecrophorusF. Zeitschrift Morphol. Ökol. Tiere 27: 518-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, C. 1990. Nischentrennung und interspezifische Konkurrenz zwischen Totengräbern der Gattung Necrophorus(Coleoptera, Silphidae) im Zürichseegebiet. Rev. Suisse Zool. 97: 453-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakofski, F., Koeniger, N. and Fuchs, S. 1990. Seasonality of honey bee colony invasion by Varroa jacobsoniOud. Apidologie 21: 547-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheucher, R. 1957. Systematik und Ökologie der deutschen Anoetinen. In. Beiträge zur Systematik und Ökologie mitteleuropäischer Acarina, Vol. 1, Part 1, H.J. Stammer (ed.) pp. 233-384. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H.H. 1992. Populationsökologische und verhaltensbiologische Untersuchungen an zwei Verhaltenstypen der Milbenart Poecilochirus carabi(Mesostigmata: Parasitidae): Anpassungen an die Biologie ihrer Wirte, die Aaskäfer der Gattung Nicrophorus(Coleoptera: Silphidae). PhD thesis, Universität Bielefeld.

  • Schwarz, H.H. 1996. Host range and behavioral preferences in German sibling species of the Poecilochirus carabicomplex (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae). Int. J. Acarol. 22: 135-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwatz, H.H. and Huck, K. 1997. Phoretic mites use flowers to transfer between foraging bumble bees. Insect: Soc. 44: 303-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H.H. and Müller, J.K. 1992. The dispersal behaviour of the phoretic mite Poecilochirus carabi(Mesostigmata, Parasitidae): adaptation to the breeding biology of its carrier Necrophorus vespilloides(Coleoptera, Silphidae). Oecologia 89: 487-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H.H. and Walzl, M.G. 1996. Pairing, oviposition and development in two sibling species of phoretic mites (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae: Poecilochirusspp.) associated with burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorusspp.). J. Nat. History 30: 1337-1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, H.H., Starrach, M. and Koulianos, S. 1998. Host specificity and permanence of associations between mesostigmatic mites (Acari: Anactinotrichida) and burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus). J. Nat. History 32: 159-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, D.S. 1996. The natural history of Nicrophorus nigrita, a western nearctic species (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Pan-Pacific Entomol. 72: 70-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springett, B.P. 1968. Aspects of the relationship between burying beetles, Necrophorusspp. and the mite, Poecilochirus necrophoriVitz. J. Animal Ecol. 37: 417-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starzyk, J.R. 1967. An interesting case of phoresis of the mite Poecilochirus necrophoriVitzh (Parasitiformes, Parasitidae) on the burying beetle Nicrophorus fossorEr. (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Przeglad Zool. 11: 51-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaku, G., Katakura, H. and Yoshida, N. 1994. Mesostigmatic mites (Acari) associated with ground, burying, roving carrion and dung beetles (Coleoptera) in Sapporo and Tomakomai, Hokkaido, Northern Japan. Zool. Sci. 11: 305-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, S.T. 1990. Interference competition among burying beetles (Silphidae, Nicrophorus). Ecol. Entomol. 15: 347-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, S.T. 1992. Monogamy to communal breeding: exploitation of a broad resource base by burying beetles (Nicrophorus). Ecol. Entomol. 17: 289-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. 1983. The effect of population structure on the evolution of mutualism: a field test involving burying beetles and their phoretic mites. Am. Nat. 121: 851-870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Knollenberg, W.G. 1984. Food discrimination and ovarian development in burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 165-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Knollenberg, W.G. 1987. Adaptive indirect effects: the fitness of burying beetles with and without their phoretic mites. Evol. Ecol. 1: 134-159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Experimentelle Oekologie, ETH Zürich, ETH Zentrum NW, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Horst H. Schwarz & Stella Koulianos

Authors
  1. Horst H. Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stella Koulianos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarz, H.H., Koulianos, S. Review. When to leave the brood chamber? Routes of dispersal in mites associated with burying beetles. Exp Appl Acarol 22, 621–631 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006054604520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006054604520