Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Melanogaster, D. Simulans and D. Mauritiana: Sex and Species Specific Discrimination

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sexual isolation among the related species Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans and D. mauritiana is asymmetrical. While D. mauritiana males mate well with both D. melanogaster and D. simulans females, females of D. mauritiana discriminate strongly against males of these two species. Similarly, D. simulans males mate with D. melanogaster females but the reciprocal cross is difficult. Interspecific crosses between several populations of the three species were performed to determine if (i) males and females of the same species share a common sexual isolation genetic system, and (ii) males (or females) use the same genetic system to discriminate against females (or males) of the other two species. Results indicate that although differences in male and female isolation depend on the populations tested, the isolation behaviour between a pair of species is highly correlated despite the variations. However, the rank order of the isolation level along the populations was not correlated in both sexes, which suggests that different genes act in male and female sexual isolation. Neither for males nor for females, the isolation behaviour of one species was paralleled in the other two species, which indicates that the genetic systems involved in this trait are species-pair specific. The implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Butlin, R.K. & M.G. Ritchie, 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37: 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caccone A., E.N. Moriyama, J.M. Gleason, L. Nigro & J.R. Powell, 1996. A molecular phylogeny for the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup and the problem of polymorphism data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 1224–1232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cariou, M.L., 1987. Biochemical phylogeny of the eight species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, including D. sechellia and D. orena. Genet. Res. Camb. 50: 181–184.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carracedo, M.C. & P. Casares, 1985. Intrapopulational genetic variation in the hybridization between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. Experientia 41: 106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carracedo M.C., P. Casares & E. San Miguel, 1987. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females and D.simulans males. II. Influence of female receptivity on hybridization. Genome 29: 334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carracedo, M.C., A. Asenjo & P. Casares, 1998a. Inheritance mode of Drosophila simulans female mating propensity with D. melanogaster males. J. Hered. 89: 101–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carracedo, M.C., A. Suarez, A. Asenjo & P. Casares, 1998b. Genetics of hybridization between D. simulans females and D. melanogaster males. Heredity 80: 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., B. Burnet & K. Connolly, 1988. Sexual isolation and courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana and their interspecific hybrids. Behav. Genet. 18: 211–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., 1989. Genetics of sexual isolation between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86: 5464–5468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., 1992. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genet. Res. Camb. 60: 25–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., 1996. Genetics of sexual isolation in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genet. Res. Camb. 68: 211–220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A., A.P. Crittenden & K. Mah, 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461–1464.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J.A. & R. Oyama, 1995. Localization of pheromonal sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on sexual isolation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92: 9505–9509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David, J., F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas & C. Bocquet, 1974. Hybrididation d'une nouvelle espèce Drosophila mauritiana avec D. melanogaster et D. simulans. Ann. Genet. 17: 235–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A.W., 1969. The genetics basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Anim. Behav. 12: 316–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., 1980. Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harr B., S. Weiss, J.R. David, G. Brem & C. Schlotterer, 1998. A microsatellite-based multilocus phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Curr. Biol. 8: 1183–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hey J. & R.M. Kliman, 1993. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol. Evol. Biol. 10: 804–822.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.M., 1984. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14: 441–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1989. The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation, pp. 279–296 in Genetics, Speciation and the Founder Principle, edited by Giddings, Kaneshiro & Anderson. Oxford University Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, M. & T.K. Watanabe, 1981. Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution 35: 1128–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliman, R.M. & J. Hey, 1993. DNA sequence variation at the period locus within and among species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Genetics 133: 375–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C.P. & J.C. Hall, 1982. The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 30: 794–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeunier, F. & M. Ashburner, 1976. Relationship within the melanogaster subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 193: 275–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemeunier, F., J.R. David, L. Tsacas & M. Asbhurner, 1986. The melanogaster species group, pp 147–256 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3c, edited by M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson and J.J.R. Thompson. Acad. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oguma, Y., T. Nemoto & Y. Kuwahara, 1992. (Z)-11-pentacosene is the major sex pheromone component in Drosophila virilis (Diptera). Chemoecology 3: 60–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P.A., 1972. Variation between strains of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in giving offspring in interspecific crosses. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 14: 77–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, H.M., 1983. Mating behaviour and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana. Evolution 37: 1283–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. & N.J. Castellan, 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book, U.S.A, 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B.N. & S. Chatterjee, 1991. No character displacement for reproductive isolation between Drosophila bipectinata and Drosophila malerkotliana. Genome 34: 849–852.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. 6th edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco, 3rd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E.B., 1970. Mating propensity and its genetic basis in Drosophila, pp. 315–379 in Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, edited by M.K. Hecht & W.C. Steere. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A.H., 1929. The genetics of Drosophila simulans. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 399: 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A.R., 1982. Adaptation and integration of evolutionary forces, pp 15–31, in Perspectives on Evolution, edited by R. Milkman, Sinauer & Sunderland. MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaru, M., H. Matsubayashi & Y. Oguma, 1995. Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship songs elicit female rejection in Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50: 905–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsacas, L. & J.R. David, 1974. Drosophila mauritiana n. sp. du groupe melanogaster de l'lle Maurice. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 79: 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uenoyama, T. & Y. Inoue, 1995. Genetic studies on premating isolation in Drosophila simulans. I. A D. simulans line highly crossable with D. melanogaster. Jap. J. Genet. 70: 365–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T.K., W.H. Lee, Y. Inoue & M. Kawanishi, 1977. Genetic variation of the hybrid crossability between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Jap. J. Genet. 52: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T.K. & M. Kawanishi, 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 205: 906–907.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1982. The shifting balance theory and macroevolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 16: 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.I., H. Hollocher, D.I. Beguns, C.F. Aquadro, Y. Xu & M.L. Wu, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: A possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 2519–2523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zouros, E., 1981. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97: 703–718.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biología Funcional, Facultad de Medicina, Area de Genética, 33071, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    Maria C. Carracedo

  2. Departamento de Biología Funcional, Facultad de Medicina, Area de Genética, 33071, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

    Carmen Suarez & Pelayo Casares

Authors
  1. Maria C. Carracedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Suarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pelayo Casares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carracedo, M.C., Suarez, C. & Casares, P. Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Melanogaster, D. Simulans and D. Mauritiana: Sex and Species Specific Discrimination. Genetica 108, 155–162 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004132414511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004132414511