Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decoupling of fission and regenerative capabilities in an asexual oligochaete

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agametic reproduction by fission has evolved numerous times in the Annelida. In this group, as well as others, the developmental processes of fission appear to be based on those of regeneration. Thus far, all fissiparous annelids whose regenerative abilities have been investigated fully are capable of regenerating both anteriorly and posteriorly. However, in this paper, I describe a unique exception to this association between fission and regenerative abilities. Regeneration experiments demonstrate that the fissiparous annelid Paranais litoralis (Oligochaeta: Naididae) has lost the capacity for full anterior regeneration. The four anterior segments of P. litoralis are produced routinely during each round of fission, yet this species is incapable of producing these same segments by anterior regeneration. I propose that fissiparous reproduction, possibly coupled with a low susceptibility to amputation in nature, may have relaxed selection for anterior regeneration in P. litoralis. The decoupling of fission and regenerative abilities suggests that some steps in the developmental trajectories that lead to fission and regeneration may have diverged in this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, M., 1902. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Regenerationsvorgänge bei den limicolen Oligochäten. Z. wiss. Zool. 1: 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adiyodi, K. G. & R. G. Adiyodi, 1993. Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, Vol. 6. Asexual Propagation and Reproductive Strategies. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, 410 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, H. J., 1964. Regeneration and natural selection. Am. Nat. 98: 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, N. J., 1952. Regeneration and budding in worms. Biol. Rev. 27: 401–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouguenec, V. & N. Giani, 1989. Les oligochètes aquatique en tant que proies des invertébrés et des vertébrés: une revue. Acta Oecol. 10: 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1986. Guide to the freshwater aquatic microdrile oligochaetes of North America. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. aquat. Scis 84: 1–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O. & B. G. M. Jamieson, 1971. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 860 pp.

  • Brondsted, H. V., 1969. Planarian Regeneration. Pergamon Press, Braunschweig, 276 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, R. C. & G. J. Brusca, 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer, Sunderland (MA), 922 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, B., 1984. Asexual propagation and reproductive strategies in aquatic Oligochaeta. Hydrobiologia 115: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, J. & S. Pai, 1944. The relations between natural fission and regeneration in Stylaria fossularis (Annelida). Physiol. Zool. 17: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, L., 1923. La rigenerazione in rapporto con la strobilazione negli Oligocheti limicoli. Bull. Ist. zool. Palermo 1: 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehorne, L., 1916. Les naïdimorphes et leur reproduction asexuée. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 56: 25–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewes, C. D. & M. J. Zoran, 1989. Neurobehavioral specializations for respiratory movements and rapid escape from predators in posterior segments of the tubificid Branchiura sowerbyi. In J. L. Kaster (ed.), Aquatic Oligochaete Biology, Hydrobiologia/Dev. Hydrobiol. 180: 65–71.

  • Elder, D., 1979. Why is regenerative capacity restricted in higher organisms? J. theor. Biol. 81: 563–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, T. W., 1899. Observations on non-sexual reproduction in Dero vaga. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 35: 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. E., 1927. Regeneration in a tropical earthworm Perionyx excavatus E. Perr. Biol. Bull. 53: 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese, A. C. & J. S. Pearse, 1975. Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York, vol. I–IX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, R. J., 1969. Principles of Regeneration. Academic Press, New York, 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, E. H., 1904. Notes on regulation in Stylaria lacustris. Biol. Bull. 6: 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D. L. & A. G. Clark, 1989. Principles of Population Genetics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (MA), 682 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H. & M. D. Pagel, 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, New York, 239 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlant-Meewis, H., 1946. Contribution a l'étude de la régénération chez les oligochètes: reconstitution du germen chez Lumbricillus lineatus (Enchytraeides). Arch. Biol. 57: 197–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlant-Meewis, H., 1953. Contribution a l'étude de la régénération chez les oligochètes aeolosomatidae. Ann. Soc. r. zool. Belg. 84: 117–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. H., 1916. An analysis of the process of regeneration in certain microdrilous oligochaetes. J. exp. Zool. 20: 99–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. H., 1938. The fragmentation of Nais paraguayensis. Physiol. Zool. 11: 126–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. H., 1940. Aspects of regeneration in annelids. Am. Nat. 74: 513–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, T. B. L., 1981. Repair and its evolution: survival versus reproduction. In C. R. Townsend & P. Calow (eds), Physiological Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach to Resource Use. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (MA): 165–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krecker, F. H., 1910. Some phenomena of regeneration in Limnodrilus and related forms. Z. wiss. Zool. 95: 383–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre, P., 1975. Clitellata. In A. C. Giese & J. S. Pearse (eds), Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol 3. Annelids and Echiurans. Academic Press, New York: 215–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, D. E., 1993. On Senescence in Asexual Metazoans. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 181 pp.

  • Morgan, T. H., 1901. Regeneration. Macmillan & Co., London, 316 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, A. E., 1952. Regeneration and Wound-Healing. Barnes & Noble, New York, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemec, A. F. L. & R. O. Brinkhurst, 1987. A comparison of methodological approaches to the subfamilial classification of the Naididae (Oligochaeta). Can. J. Zool. 65: 691–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, J. P., 1946. Studies on the cellular basis of regeneration in Nais paraguayensis, and the effects of X-rays thereon. Growth 10: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, K., 1921. Ein Beitrag zug Kenntnis der äuβeren postoperativen Regenerationsprozesse bei Stylaria lacustris L. (Nais proboscidea Müll.). Lotos Prague 69: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, O. J., 1984. Evolution of regeneration capabilities. Am. Nat. 123: 752–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rievel, H., 1896. Die Regeneration des Vorderdarmes und Enddarmes bei einigen Anneliden. Z. wiss. Zool. 2: 289–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scadding, S. R., 1977. Phylogenetic distribution of limb regeneration capacity in adult amphibia. J. exp. Zool. 202: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, P. C. & C. O. Hermans, 1975. Annelida: Polychaeta. In A. C. Giese & J. S. Pearse (eds.), Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol 3. Annelids and Echiurans. Academic Press, New York: 1–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seys, J., M. Vincx & P. Meire, 1999. Spatial distribution of oligochaetes (Clitellata) in the tidal freshwater and brackish parts of the Schelde estuary (Belgium). Hydrobiologia 406: 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankland, M. & R. M. Savage, 1997. Annelids, the segmented worms. In S. F. Gilbert & A. M. Raunio (eds), Embryology: Constructing the Organism. Sinauer, Sunderland (MA): 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., E. C. Weckesser, J. Geraudie, C. E. Maier & J. Singer, 1987. Open finger tip healing and replacement after distal amputation in Rhesus monkey with comparison to limb regeneration in lower vertebrates. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 177: 29–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strathmann, M. F., 1987. Reproduction and Development of Marine Invertebrates of the Northern Pacific Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 670 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleave, C. D., 1929. An experimental study of fission and reconstitution in Stenostomum. Physiol. Zool. 2: 18–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleave, C. D., 1937. A study of the process of fission in the naid Pristina longiseta. Physiol. Zool. 10: 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, F., 1990. Leg regeneration in web spiders and its implications for orb weaver phylogeny. Bull. br. arachnol. Soc. 8: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. P. & B. Y. Misof, 1992. Evolutionary modification of regenerative capability in vertebrates: a comparative study on teleost pectoral fin regeneration. J. exp. Zool. 261: 62–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-5245, U.S.A.

    Alexandra E. Bely

Authors
  1. Alexandra E. Bely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bely, A.E. Decoupling of fission and regenerative capabilities in an asexual oligochaete. Hydrobiologia 406, 243–251 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003763915697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003763915697

Search

Navigation