Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge management for consumer-focused product design

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the automotive industry adopts a consumer focus in its product development strategy, it offers broader product ranges, shorter model lifetimes and the ability to process orders in arbitrary lot sizes. This offers the ability to conduct early product design and development trade-off analysis among these competing objectives. A distributed knowledge-based system, which analyzes, verifies, stores, and retrieves process definitions, is needed to manage the complexity of workflows. The use of information technologies and networking capabilities is essential in the dissemination of product knowledge in order to integrate the decision-making process among heterogeneous and distributed partners/units. This paper offers insights into a knowledge management approach that enables implementing a consumer-focused product design philosophy by integrating capabilities for intelligent information support and group decision-making utilizing a common enterprise network model and knowledge interface through shared ontologies. An automotive supply chain case study is utilized in illustrating the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartalanffy, L. V. (1975) Perspectives on General System Theory, George Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I. and Over, J. (1992) Process modeling. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), 75-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, C. (1997) Enterprise architectural framework for supply-chain integration. Proceedings: 6th Annual Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, Georgia, pp. 873-878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, C., Smirnov, A. V. and Chilov, N. (2000) Business process reengineering of supply chain networks through simulation modeling and analysis. Proceedings: Second International Conference on Simulation, Gaming, Training and Business Process Reengineering in Operations, Riga, Latvia, September 8–9, 2000.

  • Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D. and Fogliatto, F. (2001) Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 72(1), 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, D., Storey, V. C. and Barron, T. M. (1999) Improving database design through the analysis of relationships. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 453-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettl, M., Feigin, G. E., Lin, G. Y. and Yao, D. D. (2000) Supply network model with base-stock control and service requirements. Operations Research, 48(2), 216-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. (1998) FIPA 98 Specification, Part 12\3-Ontology Service, http://www.fipa.org.

  • Fikes, R. and Farquhar A. (1999) Distributed repositories of highly expressive reusable ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems & Their Applications, 14(2), 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K., Müller, J. P., Heimig, H. and Scheer, A.-W. (1996) Intelligent agents in virtual enterprises. Proceedings: First International Conference and Exhibition on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, The Westminister Central Hall, London, UK, pp. 205-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. and Gruninger, M. (1999) Ontologies for Enterprise Integration, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Ontario.

  • Gasser, L. (1991) Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 107-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43(5/6), 907-928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruninger, M. (1997) Integrated ontologies for enterprise modelling, in Enterprise Engineering and Integration, Kosanke, K. and Nell, J. (eds.), Building International Consensus, Springer, pp. 368-377.

  • Hirsch, B. (1995) Information system concept for the management of distributed production. Computers in Industry, 26, 229-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO TC 184/SC 5/WG 1. (1997) Requirements for enterprise reference architectures and methodologies, http://www.mel.nist.gov/sc5wg1/gera-std/ger-anxs.html.

  • Jennings, N. R. (2000) On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 117(2), 277-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, R. (1994) Cooperation in Industrial Multi-agent Systems, Vol. 43, World Scientific Series in Computer Science, World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Johnson, M., Brien, P. and Wiegand, M. (1996) Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. Proceedings of the International Conference “The Practical Application of Intelligents and Multi-Agent Technology”, London, pp. 345-360.

  • Johannesson, P. and Perjons, E. (2001) Design principles for process modeling in enterprise application integration. Information Systems, 26, 165-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M. and Cooper, M. C. (2000) Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, C. (2000) Process modeling in conceptual categories. Proceedings: 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

  • Lee, H. L. and Billington, C. (1993) Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research, 41(5), 835-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, V. R. (1999) Cooperative multiagent systems: A personal view of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(1), 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manufacturing Enterprise Integration Program (MEIP) (1999) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland. http://www.atp.nist.gov/.

  • MESA International White Paper #6 (1998) MES Explained: A High Level Vision. http://www.mesa.org.

  • Martin, I. and Cheung, Y. (2000) SAP and business process re-engineering. Business Process Management Journal 6(2), 113-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, I. (1995) Manufacturing classification. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 6(6), 37-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, I. and Ridgway, K. (2000) Cladistics: a Taxonomy for manufacturing organizations. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(1), 16-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1982) Organizational Systematics Taxonomy, Evoluation, Classification, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Industrial Information Infrastructure Protocol (NIIIP). (1994) www.niiip.org.

  • Rubenstein-Montano, B., Leibovitz, J., Buchwalter, D., McCaw, B., Newman, K. and Rebeck, K. (2001) A System thinking framework for Knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 31, 5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T. (1998) Agents in electronic commerce: Component technologies for automated negotiation and coalition formation. Proceedings: International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, Paris, France, pp. 10-11.

  • Scheer, A.-W. (2000) ARIS\3-Business Process Modeling, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A. (1999) DESO: GDSS for virtual enterprise configuration management. Proceedings: 5th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising ICE'99, The Hague, The Netherlands.

  • Smirnov, A. V. (1994) Conceptual design for manufacture in concurrent engineering. Proceedings: Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 461-466.

  • Smirnov, A. V. and Chandra, C. (2000) Ontology-based knowledge management for co-operative supply chain configuration. Proceedings: 2000 AAAI Spring Symposium “Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes”, 20–22 March, 2000, AAAI Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 85-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, P., Heikkila, T., Kollingbaum, M. and Valckenaers, P. (1999) Aspects of co-operation in distributed manufacturing systems. Proceedings: Second International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, September 1999, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 685-717.

  • Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996) ONTOLOGIES: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2).

  • Van Hoek, R. I. (2001) The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 161-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos J., Kimble, C. and Riberio Gouveria, F. (2000) A Design for a group Memory System using Ontologies. UKAIS, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work Flow Management (WFM). (1996) www.wfmc.org

  • Wand, Y., Storey, V. C. and Weber, R. (1999) An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 494-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N. R. (eds) (1995) Intelligent Agents\3-Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lec-ture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag.

  • Zhao, J., Cheung, W. M. and Young, R. I. M. (1999) A consistent manufacturing data model to support virtual enterprises. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(3), 150-158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan—Dearborn, 4901 Evergreen Road, Dearborn, MI, 48128-1491, USA

    Charu Chandra

  2. Industrial Engineering Department, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204-4008, USA

    Ali K. Kamrani

Authors
  1. Charu Chandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali K. Kamrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, C., Kamrani, A.K. Knowledge management for consumer-focused product design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14, 557–580 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027358721819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027358721819

Search

Navigation