Skip to main content
Log in

Status and Trends of Ontario's Sydenham River Ecosystem in Relation to Aquatic Species at Risk

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sydenham River in southwestern Ontario is located in the Mixedwood Plains Ecozone, which supports the greatest diversity of flora and fauna in Canada. The river historically supported a rich aquatic community that included 80 fishes and 34 species of freshwater mussels. Fourteen aquatic species native to the river (8 fishes, 5 mussels and 1 turtle) have been designated as endangered, threatened, or of special concern by the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Canada (COSEWIC). A multi-agency Recovery Team was formed in 1999 to ensure the continued survival of these and other rare species in the river. The Sydenham River Recovery Team is the first in Canada to adopt an ecosystem approach to recovery planning for aquatic species. Information on land use patterns, water quality trends, the physical condition of the river, and the distributions of aquatic species at risk was synthesized to gain an understanding of the overall health of the river and its major anthropogenic stresses. Seven of the species at risk have declined in distribution or abundance, and three may be extirpated. The main threat to fishes and mussels is heavy loadings of sediment, nutrients, and possibly pesticides to the river via tile drainage and overland runoff from agricultural lands. A strategy that incorporates four overall approaches (management, stewardship, research and monitoring, and awareness and outreach) was developed to recover and protect this globally significant freshwater ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boersma, P. D, Kareiva, P., Fagan, W. F., Clark, J. A. and Hoekstra, J. M.: 2001, ‘How good are endangered species recovery plans?’, Bioscience 51(8), 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. N., Imhof, J. G., Biette, R. B. and Dodge, D. P.: 1987, ‘Long-term impacts of highway construction on Mill Creek, Ontario’, Ontario Fisheries Technical Report Series No. 24, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. R.: 1994, ‘Updated status of the spotted gar, Lepidosteus oculatus, in Canada, Report to COSEWIC’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J. and Putnam, D. F.: 1984, ‘The Physiography of Southern Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 2, accompanied by Map P.2715 (coloured), scale 1:600 000’, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada): 2001, ‘Canadian Species at Risk, November 2001’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley, J. L., Bolton, E. F. and Bernyk, V.: 1983, ‘Suspended solids and phosphorus loads from a clay soil: I plot studies’, Journal of Environmental Quality 12, 493–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. S. and Mayer, C. A.: 1992, Field guide to freshwater mussels of the Midwest, Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. and Frick, C.: 2002, ‘The effects of road salts on aquatic ecosystems, NWRI Contribution No: 02–308’, National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, Peter: 1977, ‘Historic vegetation maps for southwestern Ontario, Middlesex, Lambton and Kent counties, Scale 1:50,000’, Ontario Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M. and Gillingwater, S.: 1994, ‘A survey of the eastern spiny softshell turtle along the Thames and Sydenham Rivers, 1994’, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, J.: 1996, ‘Rapid stream assessment technique, field methods’, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, C. D.: 1990, ‘Status of the bigmouth buffalo, Ictiobus cyprinellus, in Canada’, Canadian Field-Naturalist 104, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E. and Layzer, J. B.: 1989, ‘Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the Cumberland River: review of life histories and ecological relationships, Biological Report 89(15)’, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grass, L. B., Willardson, L. S. and LeMerte, R. A.: 1979, ‘Soil sediment deposits in subsurface drains’, Transact. Am. Soc. Agricult. Engin. 21, 1054–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruchy, C. G., Bowen, R. H. and Gruchy, I. M.: 1973, ‘First records of the stoneroller (Campostoma anomalum) and the blackstripe topminnow (Fundulus notatus) from Canada’, J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30, 683–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, E. and Mandrak, N. E.: 1994, ‘The status of the Eastern Sand Darter, Ammocrypta pellucida, in Canada’, Can. Field-Naturalist 110, 462–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, E. and Mandrak, N. E.: 1994, ‘Updated status of the northern madtom, Noturus stigmosus, in Canada, Report to COSEWIC’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. A. D. and Caron, G. W.: 1979, ‘Sydenham River substrate survey: an inventory of substrates and potentially suitable yellow pickerel spawning sites, Report 1976–6’, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake St. Clair Assessment Unit, Chatham, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandrak, N. E. and Holm, E.: 2000, ‘Updated status of the blackstripe topminnow, Fundulusnotatus, in Canada, Report to COSEWIC’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., Staton, S. K. Mackie, G. L. and Lane, N. M.: 1998, ‘Selection of Candidate Species of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) to be Considered for National Status Designation by COSEWIC’, Can. Field-Naturalist, 112, 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., Staton, S. K. and West, E. L.: 2000, ‘Status of the wavy-rayed lamp mussel, Lampsilis fasciola (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in Ontario and Canada’, Can. Field-Naturalist 114, 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOEE (Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy): 1994, ‘Water Management-Policies, Guidelines, Provincial Water Quality Objectives of the Ministry of the Environment and Energy, July 1994’, Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa, T. F., Hartson, D. J., Gostenik, G. W., Fanslow, D. L. and Lang, G. A.: 1996, ‘Changes in the freshwater mussel community of Lake St. Clair: from Unionidae to Dreissena polymorpha in eight years’, J. Great Lakes Res., 22, 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • NatureServe: 2002, ‘NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life’, Website: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/

  • NHIC (Natural Heritage Information Center): 2000a, ‘Ontario element occurrence database’, Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHIC (Natural Heritage Information Center): 2000b, ‘Ontario Odonata atlas database’, Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRWG (National Recovery Working Group): 2001, ‘Recovery Operations Manual, Working Draft, 20 November 2001’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF): 1983a, ‘Agricultural Land Use Systems Map, Scale 1:50,000’, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF): 1983b, ‘Artificial Drainage System Map, Scale 1:25,000,’ Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR): 2000, ‘Ontario Base Maps, Middlesex, Lambton, and Chatham-Kent counties’, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B., and McKee, P: 1984, ‘Status of the spotted sucker in Canada’, Can. Field-Naturalist 98, 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmalee, P. W. and Bogan, A. E.: 1998, The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN, 328 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, W. J. and Corkum, L. D.: 2001, ‘Habitat and site affinity of the round goby’, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 27, 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • RENEW (Recovery of Nationally Endangered Wildlife): 2001, ‘Annual Report No. 11, Recovery of Nationally Endangered Wildlife in Canada’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, 36 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T. B., Logan, C., Pascoe, T. and Thompson, S. P.: 1999, ‘Methods Manual I: Creation of Reference-Condition databases for benthic invertebrate community structure, NWRI Contribution No: 99–211’, Environment Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalachli, U.: 1992, ‘The clogging of coarse gravel river beds by fine sediment’, Hydrogiologia 235/236, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staton, S. K., Metcalfe-Smith, J. L. and West, E. L.: 2000, ‘Status of the northern riffle shell, Epioblasma torulosa rangiana (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in Ontario and Canada’, Can. Field-Naturalist 114, 224–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCRCA (St. Clair Region Conservation Authority): 2001, ‘OMNR Evaluated Wetland Layer, UTM NAD 27, ArcInfo Export Format, St. Clair Region Conservation Authority, Strathroy, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L. and Jirka, K. J.: 1997, The Pearly Mussels of New York State, New York State Museum Memoir26, The New York State Education Department, Albany, NY, 113 pp. + 27 plates.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (United States Geological Survey): 1997, ‘USGS Research on saline waters co-produced with energy resources, USGS Fact Sheet FS–003–97,’ U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, E. T., Metcalfe-Smith, J. L. and DiMaio, J.: 2000a, ‘Status of the snuffbox, Epioblasma triquetra, In Canada, Report to COSEWIC’, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, E. T., Metcalfe-Smith, J. L. and DiMaio, J.: 2000b, ‘Status of the mudpuppy mussel, Simpsonaias ambigua, in Canada, Report to COSEWIC,’ Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E. L., Metcalfe-Smith, J. L. and Staton, S. K.: 2000, ‘Status of the Rayed Bean, Villosa fabalis (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in Ontario and Canada’, Can. Field-Naturalist, 114, 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, D. and Mackie, G. L.: 2001, ‘Endangered freshwater mussels in the Sydenham River Ontario, Canada, Final report to the Endangered Species Recovery Fund’, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staton, S.K., Dextrase, A., Metcalfe-Smith, J. et al. Status and Trends of Ontario's Sydenham River Ecosystem in Relation to Aquatic Species at Risk. Environ Monit Assess 88, 283–310 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025529409422

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025529409422

Navigation