Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal comparisons of leaf processing rates in two Mediterranean rivers with different nutrient availability

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The litter-bag technique was used to study the effect of seasonality (spring–summer versus autumn–winter) and nutrient availability on leaf decomposition in two Mediterranean watercourses: the Ebro river, which is eutrophic, and the Sènia stream. To establish the effect of macroinvertebrates on litter breakdown, we used air-dried leaves from the two dominant species of riparian vegetation (Populus alba and Populus nigra) along each watercourse and litter bags of two mesh sizes (100 μm and 5 mm). Macroinvertebrates were collected from the bags and ash free dry weight and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the plant detritus remaining were measured. Litter decomposition rates, in days and degree-days, were estimated using a simple exponential model. A significant effect of macroinvertebrates and seasonality on litter decay was observed only in the Ebro river. Decomposition rates were faster in this river, P. alba showing the highest rates in spring–summer (0.022–0.038 day−1). The macroinvertebrates collected from the bags were mostly collector-gatherers of the genus Chironomus. Their density increased over time and was greater in the experiments performed in spring–summer (two to ten fold higher). Higher temperatures together with increased macroinvertebrate densities led to augmented decomposition rates in the Ebro river but no effect was observed in the Sènia stream. Our data show that leaf decay is both quantitatively and qualitatively affected by inorganic nutrient levels and temperature in the ambient environment, regardless of initial C:N and C:P ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber, J. D. & J. M. Melillo, 1980. Litter decomposition: measuring state of decay and percent transfer into forest soils. Can. J. Bot. 58: 416-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S., E. Rico, M. C. Guerrero & C. Montes, 2001. Decomposition of Juncus maritimus in two shallow lakes of Doñana National Park. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 86: 4-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, F. O. & H. S. Jensen, 1991. The influence of chironomids on decomposition of organic matter and nutrient exchange in a lake sediment. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 3051-3055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. & J. R. Sedell, 1979. Detritus processing by macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ent. 24: 351-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldy, V., M. O. Gessner, M. O. & E. Chauvet, 1995. Bacteria, fungi and the breakdown of leaf litter in a large river. Oikos 74: 93-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher, F., 1997. Pitfalls of traditional techniques when studying decomposition of vascular plant remains in aquatic habitats. Limnetica 13: 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J. & I. P. Boon, 1991. A review of the methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: time to turn over an old leaf?. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 42: 1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, J. J. & M. O. Gessner, 1999. Leaf litter breakdown in a Mediterranean stream characterised by travertine precipitation. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 781-793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, E., 1987. Changes in the chemical composition of alder, poplar and willow leaves during decomposition in a river. Hydrobiologia 148: 35-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, E., 1988. Influence of the environment on willow leaf litter decomposition in the alluvial corridor of the Garonne river. Arch. Hydrobiol. 112: 371-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, E., 1997. Leaf litter decomposition in large rivers: the case of the river Garonne. Limnetica 13: 65-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, E., N. Giani & M. O. Gessner, 1993. Breakdown and invertebrate colonization of leaf litter in two contrasting streams: significance of oligochaetes in a large river. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 50: 488-495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chergui, H. & E. Pattee, 1990. The processing of leaves of trees and aquatic macrophytes in the network of the River Rhône. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 75: 281-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, M. E. & R. J. Naiman, 1984. Particulate allochthonous inputs: relationships whith stream size in an undisturbed watershed. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 41: 1473-1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., 1988. The study of stream ecosystems: a functional view. In Pomeroy, L. R. & J. Alberts (eds), Concepts of Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York): 247-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., R. C. Petersen, F. O. Howard, F. O., J. C. Wuycheck, & V. I. Holt, V. I., 1973. The utilization of leaf litter by stream detritivores. Ecology 45: 336-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K.W., M. A. Wilzbach, D.M. Gates, J. B. Perry & W. B. Taliaferro, 1989. Shredders and riparian vegetation. BioScience 39: 24-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, J. W., J. D. Newbold, A. F. Trimble, & R. W. Stark, 1981. The limiting role of phosphorus in a woodland stream ecosystem: effects of a P enrichment of leaf decomposition and primary producers. Ecology 62: 146-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graça, M. A. S. 1993. Patterns and processes in detritus-based systems. Limnologica 32: 104-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graça, M. A. S., R. C. F. Ferreira & C. N. Coimbra. 2001. Litter processing along a stream gradient: the role of invertebrates and decomposers. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 20: 408-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff, K., M. Ehrhardt & K. Kremling, 1983. Methods of Seawater Analysis. Chemie Weinheim (eds).

  • Grattan, R. M. & K. Suberkropp, 2001. Effects of nutrient enrichment on yellow poplar leaf decomposition and fungal activity in streams. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 20: 33-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, M. B. & S. A. Perry, 1994. Fungal biomass and leaf litter processing in streams of different water chemistry. Hydrobiology 294: 51-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W. & S. G. Fisher, 1976. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics during leaf decay in nutrient-enriched stream microecosystems. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 221-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, J. G., M. W. Oswood, R. J. Stout & C. M. Pringle, 1994. Latitudinal patterns in leaf litter breakdown: is temperature really important? Freshwat. Biol. 32: 401-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., B. Bostrom & W. Van de Bund, 1989. Interactions between Chironomun plumosus (L.) and the microbial community in surficial sediments of a shallow, eutrophic lake. Limnol. Oceanog. 34: 992-1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, N. K. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1971. The fate of dead leaves that fall into streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 68: 465-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, L. & V. McArthur, 1990. Effect of nutrient content on leaf decomposition in a coastal plain stream. A comparison of green and senescent leaves. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 5: 269-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd Edn. Elsevier: Amsterdam. 853 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. C. & G. A. Lamberti, 1995. Rapid decomposition of summer-input leaves in a Northern Michigan stream. Ann. mid. Nat. 133: 184-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, C. P. & A. Kowalczewski, 1969. The disappearance of leaf litter and its contribution to production in the river Thames. J. Ecol. 57: 543-552.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. V., J. R. Barnes & B. J. Hansen 1988. Seasonal dynamics of leaf litter breakdown in a UTA alpine stream J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 44-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, M., M. Martinez, O. Hernandez & F. A. Comin, 2001. Comparison of leaf decomposition in two Mediterranean rivers: a large eutrophic river and an oligotrophic stream (S Catalonia, NE Spain). Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 86: 475-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R.W. & D. L. Lawson, 1992. The role of leaf litter macroinvertebrates in stream-floodplain dynamics. Hydrobiologia 248: 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. L. & C. Johnson, 1983. The influence of elevated nitrate concentration on rate of leaf decomposition in a stream. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 177-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., K. W. Cummins, R. C. Petersen, C. E. Cushing, D. A. Bruns, J. R. Sedell & R. L. Vannote, 1985. Developments in stream ecosystem theory. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1045-1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, E. & H. Chergui, 1994. On the incomplete breakdown of submerged leaves. Verh. int Ver. Limnol. 25: 1545-1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, E., C. Bornard & S. Mourelatos, 1986. La décomposition des feuilles mortes dans le résau fluvial du Rhône: influence du milieu et principaux agents responsables. Sciences de l'Eau 45: 45-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. P., M. A. S. Graça & M. Molles, 1998. Leaf litter decomposition in relation to litter physico-chemical properties, fungal biomass, arthropod colonization, and geographical origin of plant species. Pedobiologia 42: 316-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. C. & K. W. Cummins, 1974. Leaf processing in a woodland stream. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 343-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo, J., A. Basanguren, A. Elosegui, J. Molinero, E. Fabre & E. Chauvet, 1998. Afforestation with Eucalyptus globulus and leaf litter decomposition in streams of northern Spain. Hydrobiologia 373: 101-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R. 1974. Environmental patchiness and the breakdown of leaf litter in a woodland stream. Ecology 55: 1271-1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. T. & M. O. Gessner, 2000. Nutrient addition accelerates leaf breakdown in an alpine springbrook. Oecologia 122: 258-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. M., S. K. Meegan, E. S. Engstrom, S. A. Perry & W. B. Perry, 1996. Leaf processing rates under different temperature regimes in three headwater streams. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 277-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer. T. V. & G. W. Minshall, 2001. Effect of nutrient enrichment and leaf quality on the breakdown of leaves in a hardwater stream. Freshwat. Biol. 46: 603-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B. & B. Higler, 1985. Questions and comments on the River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 1038-1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suberkropp, K., 1995. The influence of nutrients on fungal growth, productivity and sporulation during leaf breakdown in streams. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1361-1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suberkropp, K. & E. Chauvet, 1995. Regulation of breakdown by fungi in streams: influences of water chemistry. Ecology 76: 1433-1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, J.H. & M. D. Delong, 1994. The riverine productivity model: a heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems. Oikos 70: 305-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B., S. L. Eggert, J. L. Meyer & J. R. Webster, 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277: 102-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R. & E. F. Benfield, 1986. Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 567-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. 1990. Land-water interfaces: metabolic and limnological regulators. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 6-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Edn. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menéndez, M., Hernández, O. & Comín, F.A. Seasonal comparisons of leaf processing rates in two Mediterranean rivers with different nutrient availability. Hydrobiologia 495, 159–169 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025462708460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025462708460

Navigation