Skip to main content
Log in

Competition Between Acetylcholine and a Nondepolarizing Muscle Relaxant for Binding to the Postsynaptic Receptors at the Motor End Plate: Simulation of Twitch Strength and Neuromuscular Block

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the study was to simulate twitch strength and neuromuscular block produced by nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. Methods: In the proposed model, affinities of the two binding sites at a single postsynaptic receptor for acetylcholine (A) and the muscle relaxant (D) define the formation of three complexes with A only, three complexes with D only, and two complexes with both A and D. Twitch strength was postulated to be a function of the receptors with both binding sites occupied by A, and two constants. Neuromuscular block (NMB) was calculated from NMB=1-twitch. Results: Stimulus-induced release of A results in rapid, but transient, changes in the concentrations of free A, the eight complexes, and the unoccupied receptors. Muscle relaxants that display either a congruous or an inverse pattern of affinities for the binding sites relative to those of A produce NMB vs. [D] curves with slightly different slopes but markedly different estimates for IC50. Depending on the number of activated receptors at the end plates of muscle fibers, the simulations represent the distributions of contracting fibers in a whole muscle. Conclusion: Simulations of competition between A and D for binding to two sites at a receptor reveal that the potencies of muscle relaxants, defined by IC50, and the slopes of the NMB vs. [D] curves depend on (1) the affinities of D for the two binding sites, (2) the orientation of the affinities relative to those of A, and (3) the affinities of A for the same two sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C. Hull, B. H. Van, K. McLeod, A. Sibbald, and M. Watson. A pharmacodynamic model for pancuronium. Br. J. Anaesth. 50:1113-1123 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Sheiner, D. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-tubocurarine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. (St. Louis) 25:358-371 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Donati and C. Meistelman. A kinetic-dynamic model to explain the relationship between high potency and slow onset time for neuromuscular blocking drugs. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 19:537-552 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. H. Proost, J. M. K. H. Wierda, and D. K. F. Meijer. An extended pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model describing quantitatively the influence of plasma protein binding, tissue binding, and receptor binding on the potency and time course of action of drugs. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 24:45-77 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Laurin, F. Donati, F. Nekka, and F. Varin. Peripheral link model as an alternative for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of drugs having a very short elimination half-life. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 28:7-25 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. C. Bowman. Pharmacology of neuromuscular function, 2nd edition. Wright, London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Feldman. Neuromuscular Block. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. R. Bevan, J. C. Bevan, and F. Donati. Muscle Relaxants in Clinical Anesthesia. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., Chicago, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Sine and T. Claudio. Gamma-and delta-subunits regulate the affinity and the cooperativity of ligand binding to the acetylcholine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 266:19369-19377 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. E. Pedersen and J. B. Cohen. D-Tubocurarine binding sites are located at α-γ and α-δ subunit interfaces of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:2785-2789 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. M. Fambrough, D. B. Drachman, and S. Satyamurti. Neuromuscular junction in myasthenia gravis: Decreased acetycholine receptors. Science 182:293-295 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pestronk, S. Drachman, and G. Self. Measurement of junctional acetylcholine receptors in myasthenia gravis: Clinical correlates. Muscle and Nerve 8:245-251 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. L. Rosenberry. Quantitative simulations of endplate currents at neuromuscular junctions based on the reaction of acetylcholine with acetylcholine receptors and acetylcholinesterase. Biophys. J. 26:263-290 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Hobbinger. Pharmacology of Anticholinesterase Drugs. In: E. Zaimis (ed): Neuromuscular junction. Springer-Verlag Berlin, 1976, 487-581.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. L. Rosenberry. Acetylcholinesterase. Adv. Enzymol. 43:103-218 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Fersht. Enzyme Structure and Mechanism. 2nd ed, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. H. Fletcher and J. H. Steinbach. Ability of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs to act as partial agonists at fetal and adult mouse nicotinic receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 49:938-947 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. E. Amaki, B. E. Waud, and D. R. Waud. Atracurium-receptor kinetics: Simple behavior from a mixture. Anesth. Analg. 64:777-780 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Kopman, M. Klewicka, and G. Neuman. An alternate method for estimating the dose-response relationships of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anesth. Analg. 90:1191-1197 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. S. Vizi and B. Lendvai. Side effects of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants: Relationship to their antinicotinic and antimuscarinic actions. Pharmacol. Ther. 73:75-89 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. G. Bradshaw, N. J. N. Harper, B. J. Pleuvry, and C. Y. Modla. Differing potencies of muscle relaxants on rat and guinea-pig phrenic nerve preparations. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 38:623-624 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Nigrovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nigrovic, V., Amann, A. Competition Between Acetylcholine and a Nondepolarizing Muscle Relaxant for Binding to the Postsynaptic Receptors at the Motor End Plate: Simulation of Twitch Strength and Neuromuscular Block. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 30, 23–51 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023245409315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023245409315

Navigation