Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting soybean yield in a dry and wet year using a soil productivity index

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A soil-based productivity index (PI) has been developed and is being tested as a means of quantitatively assessing potential soil productivity and predicting crop yield. Validation of the PI requires the PI-yield calibration for various soil-crop-climate systems. It is hypothesized that PI predictability and accuracy would be enhanced by inclusion of a soil water balance component. This study aims at developing a sufficiency factor that accounts for dynamics of soil water influenced by weather to improve the PI predictability. Soybeans (Glycine max[L.] Merr.) were grown in 1992 and 1993 on Mexico soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Mollic Endoaqualfs). Test plots had altered A-horizon thicknesses of 0, 12.5, 25, and 37.5 cm over Bt horizons. A range of PI values in the plots resulted due to A-horizon treatment. The PI increased with increasing A-horizon thicknesses or depth to the Bt horizons. The PI was highly correlated with plot yield in 1992, a relatively dry year, in comparison with 1993, a relatively wet year. Inclusion of a factor assessed by daily balance of soil water significantly enhanced PI predictive power by 20% in both years. The factor best improved the PI predictability when based on the number of soil dry-wet cycles for given depth during the growing season. This study illustrates that yearly variation of soil water induced by weather should be considered for assessing crop performance based on soil properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnhisel R I, J M Hower and L D Beard 1992 Development of a soil productivity index for use in prime farmland reclamation. In Proceedings of the 1992 National Symposium on Prime Farmland Reclamation. Eds. R E Dunker, Barnhisel R I and R G Darmody. pp. 205–212. Dept. of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck D L, Darrah L L and Zuber M S 1987 An improved technique for measuring resistance to root pulling in maize. Crop Sci. 27, 356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck D L, Darrah L L and Zuber M S 1988 Relationship of root tensile strength to vertical root pulling resistance in maize. Crop Sci. 28, 571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake G R and Hartge K H 1986 Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. Ed. A Klute. pp. 363–375. Agronomy 9.

  • Boudeman J W 1989 Above-and below-ground production of three forage legumes related to soil properties and a soil-based productivity index. MS thesis. University Of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Brees D R 1968 Soil formation and climate in Missouri. MS thesis. Univ. of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Brotslaw D J, Darrah L L, Zuber M S and Krause G F 1988 Effect of prolificacy on grain yield and root and stalk strength in maize. Crop Sci. 28, 750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J R and Rodriguez R R 1983 Soil testing: a guide for conducting soil test in Missouri. Ext. Circ. 923. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho P 1991 A productivity index for Leucaena Leucocephala in Central America. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R B and Hammer R D 1992 Soil geomorphology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 108–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher R R, Darrah L L and Zuber M S 1985 Root development in maize as measured by vertical pulling resistance. Maydica 30, 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale M R, Grigal D F and Harding R B 1991. Soil productivity index: Prediction of site quality for white spruce plantations. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1701–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantzer C J and McCarty T R 1987 Predicting corn yields on a claypan soil using a soil productivity index. Trans. ASAE 30, 1347–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R D 1992 A soil-based productivity index to assess surface mine reclamation. In Proceedings of the 1992 National Symposium on Prime Farmland Reclamation. Eds. R E Dunker, R I Barnhisel and R G Darmody. pp. 221–232. Dept. of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson G S, Hammer R D and Grigal D F 1988 Can measurable soil properties be integrated into a framework for characterizing forest productivity? In Proceedings of 7th North American Forest Soil Conference. Eds. S P Gessel et al. pp. 137–154. Vancouver, B.C. CAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indorante S J 1990 Soil properties on eroded and native central Missouri deep loess soils. Ph.D. Diss., University of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Indorante S J, Fullmer L R, Hammer R D and Koenig P G 1990 Particle-size analysis by a modified pipette procedure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 560–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry L N, Scrivener C L and Keener M E 1983 A soil productivity index based upon predicting water depletion and root growth. Missouri Agri. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 1051.

  • Leeper R A, Runge E C A and Walker H M 1974 Effect of plant variable stored soil moisture on corn yield: II. Variable climatic conditions. Agron. J. 66, 728–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill L L 1979 An evaluation of soil productivity based on root growth and water depletion. M.S.Thesis. University of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Pierce F J, Dowdy R H, Larson W E and Graham W A P 1985 Soil productivity in the corn belt: An assessment of erosion's long-term effects. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhe R V 1956 Geomorphic surfaces and the nature of soils. Soil Sci. 82, 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrivner C L, Baker J C and Brees D R 1973 Combined daily climatic data and dilute solution chemistry in studies of soil profile formation. Soil Sci. 115, 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrivner C L, Koenig P G and Conkling B L 1986 The effects of soil erosion upon soil productivity in Missouri farm-fields. University of Missouri Columbia, Extension Circular 950.

  • Thompson A L, Gantzer C J and Anderson S H 1991 Topsoil depth, fertility, water management, and weather influences on yield. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1085–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson A L, Gantzer C J and Hammer R D 1992 Productivity of a claypan soil under rain-fed and irrigated conditions. J. Soil Water Cons. 47, 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P J, Jansen I J and Hools C L 1987 Penetrometer resistance and bulk density as parameters for predicting root system performance in mine soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 1288–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite C W and Mather J R 1955 The water balance. Publication in Climatology. Drexel Institute of Technology 8, 1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilding L P and Drees L R 1983 Spatial variability and pedology. In Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy I. Concepts and Interactions. Eds. L P Wilding, N E Smeck and G F Hall. pp. 83–116. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, J., Hammer, R., Thompson, A. et al. Predicting soybean yield in a dry and wet year using a soil productivity index. Plant and Soil 250, 175–182 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022801322245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022801322245

Navigation