Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Optimality of the Competitive Process: Kimura's Theorem and Market Dynamics

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper considers the optimality properties of a market economy in terms of three propositions that evaluate the outcomes of and the process of competition between a population of firms working within a given economic environment. We show that when firms differ in more than one competitive characteristic then competition does not select in general the most efficient firm nor does it always result in increases in the average efficiency with which resources are utilized. Drawing upon a theorem of Kimura, however, we show that competition has the property of maximizing the rate of change of the average selective characteristics in the population. We conclude that a more nuanced appraisal of the institutions of the competitive process is surely necessary. From an evolutionary standpoint, the outcomes of competition are always contingent on the nature of the selection environment and the characteristics of the whole population of firms that are being selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Andersen, Esben S. 1994. Evolutionary economics: post Schumpeterian contributions. Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley & Franco Malerba. 2001. Is the tendency to variation a chief cause of progress? Industrial and Corporate Change 10:561–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, James F. & Motoo Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. Martin & J. Stanley Metcalfe. 2001. Firm routines, customer switching and market selection under duopoly. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11:433–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni. 2000. Innovation, organisation and economic dynamics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Steven A. 1998. Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press.

  • Friedman, Milton. 1953. The methodology of positive economics in essays in positive economics. Chicago University Press.

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1993. Economics and evolution. Polity Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, Elias. 2000. Survival of the least foolish of fools: the limits of evolutionary selection theory. Journal of Bioeconomics 2: 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, Motoo. 1958. On the change of population fitness by natural selection. Heredity 12:145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1957. Three essays on the state of economic science. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, Richard G. & R. Kevin Lancaster. 1956. The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies 24:11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, Marianna. 2000. Firm size, innovation and market structure. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. Stanley. 1998. Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. Stanley. 2001. Evolutionary economics: an overview. Pp. 1–16 in J. Foster & J.S. Metcalfe (ed.) Frontiers of Evolutionary Economics, Edward Elgar.

  • Nelson, Richard R. & Sidney Winter. 1984. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.

  • Ng, Y-K, 1979. Welfare economics. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, Paul, H. Johns & L. Smith. 2001. Creative destruction and system fitness: an agent based model of evolving fitness, maximizing firms and the implications for public policy. Mimeo. Volterra Consulting Co., London.

  • Phelps, Edmund & Sidney Winter. 1970. Optimal price policy under atomistic competition. Pp. 309–337 in E. Phelps (ed.). Micro foundations of employment and inflation theory. W. W. Norton., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, Gerry & Bart Verspagen. 1998. Economic growth as a evolutionary process. Pp. 265–295 in J. Lesourne & A. Orléan (ed.). Advances in Self Organization and Evolutionary Economics. Economica, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz. Joseph E. 1997. Whither socialism. MIT Press.

  • Winter, Sidney. 1964. Economic “natural selection” and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays 4:225–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1999. Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics 1:19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESRC Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition and School of Economic Studies, University of Manchester, UK

    J. Stanley Metcalfe

Authors
  1. J. Stanley Metcalfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metcalfe, J.S. On the Optimality of the Competitive Process: Kimura's Theorem and Market Dynamics. Journal of Bioeconomics 4, 109–133 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021143303818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021143303818

Search

Navigation