Abstract
Genetic markers provide a useful tool toestimate pairwise coancestry betweenindividuals in the absence of a known pedigree. Inthe present work 62 pigs from two relatedstrains of Iberian breed, Guadyerbas andTorbiscal, belonging to a conservationprogramme with completely known pedigrees since1945, have been genotyped for 49microsatellites. Four coefficients thatsummarise molecular resemblance betweenindividuals together with eightestimators of coancestry have been calculatedfrom this information. Their values werecompared with the genealogical coancestry,calculated from the complete or partialpedigree. The eight estimations obtained usingmolecular information substantiallyunderestimate the coancestry calculated usingthe genealogical analysis. The correlationbetween the estimates and the genealogicalvalues was also calculated. This correlationwas high, between 0.78 and 0.93 for differentestimators, when all pairwise comparisons amongthe 62 animals were considered. However, thecorrelation decreases remarkably to 0.49–0.69and 0.37–0.47 for the Guadyerbas and Torbiscalpopulations respectively, when they wereanalysed separately. All the correlations weresimilar to those obtained when using simplecoefficients of molecular resemblance such asmolecular coancestry or similarity indexes.Finally, simulations were carried out tofurther explore the results obtained. It isconcluded that lack of information on theallele frequencies in the base population mayexplain the bias of these estimators inpopulations with complex pedigrees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avise JC (1994) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature, 368, 455–457.
Caballero A, Toro MA(2000) Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet. Res., 75, 331–343.
Coulson TN, Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Beaumont M, Marshall TC, Slate J, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH (1998) Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B, 265, 489–495.
Ellegren H (1999) Inbreeding and relatedness in Scandinavian grey wolves Canis lupus. Hereditas, 130, 230–244.
Emik LO, Terrill CE (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Heredity, 40, 51–55.
Falconer DS, Mackay TF (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn. Longman, Harlow, Essex.
Geyer CJ, Ryder OA, Chemnick LG, Thompson EA (1993) Analysis of relatedness in the Californian condors, from DNA fingerprints. Mol. Biol. Evol., 10, 571–589.
Geyer CJ, Thompson EA (1995) A new approach to the joint estimation of relationship from DNA fingerprint data. In: Population Management for Survival and Recovery (eds. Ballou JD, Gilpin M, Foose TJ), pp. 245–260. Columbia University Press.
Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1995) An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellites loci. Genetics, 139, 463–471.
Kuhnlein U, Zadworny D, Dawe Y, Fairfull RW, Gavora JS (1990) Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics, 125, 161–165.
Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficinent. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 5, 107–117.
Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakrabarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum. Hered., 43, 45–52.
Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of the pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 1753–1766.
MacCluer JW, VandeBerg JL, Read B, Ryder OA (1986) Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biol., 5, 147–160.
Malécot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l'hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris.
Mousseau T, Ritland K, Heath DD (1998) A novel method for estimating heritability using molecular markers. Heredity, 80, 218–224.
Odriozola M (1976) Investigación sobre los datos acumulados en dos piaras experimentales. IRYDA, Madrid.
Oldenbroek JK (1999) Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources. DLO Institute for Animal Sciences and Health, The Netherlands.
Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using molecular markers. Evolution, 43, 258–274.
Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Genet. Res., 67, 175–186.
Ritland K, Ritland C (1996) Inferences about quantitative inheritance based upon natural population structure in the common monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution, 50, 1074–1082.
Rodrigañez J, Toro MA, Rodriguez C, Silió L (2000) Alleles survival from Portuguese and Spanish strains in a population of Iberian pig. In: Tradition and innovation in Mediterranean pig production (eds. Afonso JA, Tirapicos JL), pp. 57–61.
Rumball W, Franklin IR, Frankham R, Sheldon BL (1994) Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 136, 1039–1049.
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classifications. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Thomas SC, Pemberton JM, Hill WG (2000) Estimating variance components using inferred relationships. Heredity, 84, 427–438.
Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann. Hum. Genet., 40, 201–204.
Toro MA, Rodrigañez J, Silió L, Rodriguez C (2000) Genealogical analysis of a closed herd of black hairless Iberian pigs. Conserv. Biol., 14, 1843–1851.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toro, M., Barragán, C., Óvilo, C. et al. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecular markers. Conservation Genetics 3, 309–320 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019921131171
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019921131171