Abstract
The standard measure of productivity growth is the Solow residual. Its evaluation requires data on factor input shares or prices. Since these prices are presumed to match factor productivities, the standard procedure amounts to accepting at face value what is supposed to be measured. In this paper we estimate total factor productivity growth without recourse to data on factor input prices. Factor productivities are defined as Lagrange multipliers to the program that maximizes the level of domestic final demand. The consequent measure of total factor productivity is shown to encompass not only the Solow residual, but also the efficiency change of frontier analysis and the hitherto slippery terms-of-trade effect. Using input-output tables from 1962 to 1991 we show that the source of Canadian productivity growth has shifted from technical change to terms-of-trade effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berndt, E. and M. Fuss. (1986). “Productivity Measurement with Adjustments for Variations in Capacity Utilization, and Other Forms of Temporary Equilibrium.” Journal of Econometrics 33, 7-29.
Bernstein, J. I. and P. Mohnen. (1991). “Price Cost Margins, Exports and Productivity Growth:With an Application to Canadian Industries.” Canadian Journal of Economics 24, 638-659.
Bergeron, L., Y. Fauvel et A. Paquet. (1995). “L'indicateur synthétique avancé de l'économie canadienne selon la méthode de Stock et Watson.” Mimeo, Centre de recherche sur l'emploi et des fluctuations économiques, UQAM.
Carter, A. P. (1970). Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Caves, D.W., L. R. Christensen and J. A. Swanson. (1981). “Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-1974.” American Economic Review 71, 994-1002.
Coelli, T., D. S. P. Rao and G. Battese. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
David, P. (1990). “The Dynamo and the Computer.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 80(2), 355-361.
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Diewert, W. E. and C. Morrison. (1986). “Adjusting Output and Productivity Indexes for Changes in the Terms of Trade.” Economic Journal 96, 659-679.
Dixit, A. and R. Pindyck. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
de Jong, G. (1996). “Canada's Postwar Manufacturing Performance: A Comparison with the United States.” Research Memorandum, Groningen Growth and Development Center, GD-32.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell and Z. Zhang. (1994). “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Changes in Industrialised Countries.” American Economic Review 84, 66-83.
Färe, R. and S. Grosskopf. (1996). “Productivity and Intermediate Products: A Frontier Approach.” Economics Letters 50, 65-70.
Farrell, M. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General 120(3), 253-282.
Hall, R. (1990). “Invariance Properties of Solow's Residual.” In P. Diamond (ed.), Growth/Productivity/-Employment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 71-112.
Hayashi, F. (1982). “Tobin's Marginal q andAverage q:ANeoclassical Interpretation.” Econometrica 50, 213-224.
Hulten, C. R. (1978). “Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs.” Review of Economic Studies 45(3), 511-518.
Hulten, C. R. (1979). “On the Importance of Productivity Change.” American Economic Review 65, 956-965.
Johnson, J. (1994). “Une base de données KLEMS décrivant la structure des entrées de l'industrie canadienne.” Statistique Canada, Division des Entrées-Sorties, Cahier Technique #73F.
Jorgenson, D. and Z. Griliches. (1967). “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies 34(3), 308-350.
Lichtenberg, F. R. and Z. Griliches. (1989). “Errors of Measurement in Output Deflators.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1-9.
Mohnen, P., Th. ten Raa and G. Bourque. (1997). “Mesures de la croissance de la productivité dans un cadre d'équilibre général: L'économie du Québec entre 1978 et 1984.” Canadian Journal of Economics 30(2), 295-307.
Morrison, C. (1986). “Productivity Measurement with Non-Static Expectations and Varying Capacity Utilization: An Integrated Approach.” Journal of Econometrics 33, 51-74.
Morrison, C. (1988). “Quasi-Fixed Inputs in U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing: A Generalized Leontief Restricted Cost Function Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70(2), 275-287.
Nishimizu, M. and J. M. Page Jr. (1982). “Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965-1978.” Economic Journal 92, 920-936.
Perelman, S. (1995). “R&D, Technological Progress and Efficiency Change in Industrial Activities.” Review of Income and Wealth 41(3), 349-366.
Sickles, R., D. Good and R. Johnson. (1986). “Allocative Distortions and the Regulatory Transition of the U.S.
Airline Industry.” Journal of Econometrics 33(1/2), 143-163.
Siegel, D. (1994). “Errors in Output Deflators Revisited: Unit Values and the PPI.” Economic Inquiry 32(1), 11-32.
Solow, R. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3), 312-320.
ten Raa, Th. (1995). Linear Analysis of Competitive Economies. LSE Handbooks in Economics, Prentice Hall-Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
Weitzman, M. (1976). “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 156-162.
Wolff, E. (1985). “Industrial Composition, Interindustry Effects, and the U.S. Productivity Slowdown.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 268-277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raa, T.t., Mohnen, P. Neoclassical Growth Accounting and Frontier Analysis: A Synthesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 111–128 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016558816247
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016558816247