Abstract
In this article I give a naturalistic-cum-formal analysis of therelation between beauty, empirical success, and truth. The analysis is based on the onehand on a hypothetical variant of the so-called `mere-exposure effect' which has been more orless established in experimental psychology regarding exposure-affect relationshipsin general and aesthetic appreciation in particular (Zajonc 1968; Temme 1983; Bornstein 1989;Ye 2000). On the other hand it is based on the formal theory of truthlikeness andtruth approximation as presented in my From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism (2000).The analysis supports the findings of James McAllister in his beautifulBeauty and Revolution in Science (1996), by explaining and justifying them.First, scientists are essentially right in regarding aesthetic criteria useful for empiricalprogress and even for truth approximation, provided they conceive of them as less hard thanempirical criteria. Second, the aesthetic criteria of the time, the `aesthetic canon', maywell be based on `aesthetic induction' regarding nonempirical features of paradigms of successfultheories which scientists have come to appreciate as beautiful. Third, aestheticcriteria can play a crucial, schismatic role in scientific revolutions. Since they may well be wrong, they may, in the hands of aesthetic conservatives, retard empirical progress and hence truth approximation, but this does not happen in the hands of aesthetically flexible, `revolutionary' scientists.
We may find totallyopposite things beautiful: a simplemathematical principle as well as a series of unrepeatable complex contingencies. It is a matter of psychology.(Stephen Jay Gould, translated passage from (Kayzer 2000, 30)).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bornstein, R. F.: 1989, 'Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968–1987', Psychological Bulletin 106(2), 265–289.
Bornstein, R. F.: 1994, 'Are Subliminal Mere Exposure Effects a Form of Implicit Learning?', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 398–399.
Derksen, T.: 1999, 'Schoonheid als argument. Over James W. McAllister, Beauty and Revolution in Science', Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 91(3), 168–173.
Kayzer, W.: 2000, Het boek over de schoonheid en de troost, Contact, Amsterdam.
Kieseppä, I.: 1997, 'Akaike Information Criterion Curve-Fitting, and the Philosophical Problem of Simplicity', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48(1), 21–48.
Kuipers, T.: 1991, 'Dat vind ik nou mooi', in R. Segers (ed.), Visies op cultuur en literatuur. Opstellen naar aanleiding van het werk van J.J.A. Mooij, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 69–75.
Kuipers, T.: 1997, 'The Dual Foundation of Qualitative Truth Approximation', Erkenntnis 47(2), 145–179.
Kuipers, T.: 2000, From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism, Synthese Library, Vol. 287, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Kuipers, T.: 2001, Structures in Science, Synthese Library, Vol. 301, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Kuipers, T., R. Vos, and H. Sie: 1992, 'Design Research Programs and Logic of Their Development', Erkenntnis 37(1), 37–63.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
McAllister, J.: 1996, Beauty and Revolution in Science, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
McAllister, J.: 1998, 'Is Beauty a Sign of Truth in Scientific Theories?', American Scientist 86, 174–183.
McAllister, J.: 1999, 'Waarheid en schoonheid in de wetenschap', Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 93(1), 153–167.
Mull, H. K.: 1957, 'The Effect of Repetition Upon the Enjoyment of Modern Music', The Journal of Psychology 43, 155–162.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Regt, Henk de: 1998, 'Explaining the Splendour of Science', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29(1), 155–165.
Seamon, J. G. et al.: 1995, 'The Mere Exposure Effect is Based on Implicit Memory', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(3), 711–721.
Sober, E.: 1998, 'Simplicity (in Scientific Theories)', Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 8, 780–783.
Sober, E.: 20002, Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Temme, J.: 1983, Over smaak valt te twisten. Sociaal-psychologische beïnvloedingsprocessen van esthetische waardering (Accounting for Tastes. Social Psychological Influence Processes on Aesthetic Appreciation). With a summary in English. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Thagard, P.: 1988, Computational Philosophy of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Thagard, P. (1992) Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Vos, M. de: 1999, 'Diep in het geheim gestoken. Over duistere poëzie', in Mooi, special issue De Gids 3/4, 166–172.
Weinberg, S.: 1993, Dreams of a Final Theory, Vintage, London.
Ye, G.: 2000, Modeling the Unconscious Components of Marketing Communication: Familiarity, Decision Criteria, Primary Affect, and Mere-Exposure Effect, Dissertation, Tilburg.
Ye, G. and W. F. Van Raaij: 1997, 'What Inhibits the Mere-Exposure Effect: Recollection or Familiarity?', Journal of Economic Psychology 18, 629–648.
Zajonc, R.: 1968, Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Monograph supplement 9 of The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Zwart, S.: 1998), Approach to the Truth. Verisimilitude and Truthlikeness, Dissertation, University of Groningen, ILLC Dissertation Series, Amsterdam. (A revised version will appear in the Synthese Library of Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuipers, T.A.F. Beauty, A Road To The Truth. Synthese 131, 291–328 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016188509393
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016188509393