Abstract
Aims: Comparison of breath-hold MR phase contrast technique in the estimation of cardiac shunt volumes with the invasive oximetric technique. Methods and Results: Seventeen patients with various cardiac shunts (10 ASD, 3 VSD, 1 PDA, 3 PFO) and five healthy volunteers were investigated using a 1.5 Tesla system. The mean flow velocity, the mean volume flow and the transverse area in the ascending aorta and the left and right pulmonary artery were measured using the MR phase contrast breath-hold technique (through plane, FLASH 2D-sequence, TR/TE 11/5 ms, phase length 106 ms, VENC 250 cm/s). The ratio of mean flow in the pulmonary (Q p: sum of mean flows in the left and right pulmonary arteries) and the systemic circulation (Q s: mean flow in the ascending aorta) was calculated and compared with invasively measured Q p:Q s ratios. Oximetry was performed within 24 h of the MR investigation. The non-invasive shunt measurement in the 17 patients showed a mean Q p:Q s ratio of 2.00 ± 0.86. Comparing the MR data with the invasively measured Q p:Q s showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.91 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cardiac shunt volumes can be measured reliably using a shorter acquisition time with breath-hold MR phase contrast technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daniel WC, Lange RA, Willard JE, Landau C, Hillis LD. Oximetric versus indicator dilution techniques for quantitating intracardiac left-to-right shunting in adults [see comments]. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 199–200.
Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Oximetric quantitation of intracardiac left-to-right shunting: limitations of the Q p=Q s ratio. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 246–247.
Boehrer JD, Lange RA, Willard JE, Grayburn PA, Hillis LD. Advantages and limitations of methods to detect, localize, and quantitate intracardiac left-to-right shunting. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 448–455.
Antman EM, Marsh JD, Green LH, Grossman W. Blood oxygen measurements in the assessment of intracardiac left to right shunts: a critical appraisal of methodology. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46: 265–271.
Carter SA, Bajec DF, Yannicelli E, Wood EH. Estimation of left-to-right shunt from arterial dilution curves. J Lab and Clin Med 1960; 55: 77–88.
Niggemann E, Ma P, Sunnergren K, Winniford M, Hillis L. Detection of intracardial left-to-right shunting in adults: a prospective analysis of the variability of the standard indocyanine green technique in patients without shunting. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 355–357.
McIlveen B, Murray I, Giles R, Molk G, Scarf C, McCredie R. Clinical application of radionuclide quantitation of left-to-right cardiac shunts in children. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47: 1273–1278.
Castillo C, Kyle J, Gilson W, Rowe G. Simulated shunt curves. Am J Cardiol 1966; 17: 691–694.
Arheden H, Holmqvist C, Thilen U, et al. Left-to-right cardiac shunts: comparison of measurements obtained with MR velocity mapping and with radionuclide angiography [in process citation]. Radiology 1999; 211: 453–458.
Rittoo D, Sutherland GR, Shaw TR. Quantification of left-to-right atrial shunting and defect size after balloon mitral commissurotomy using biplane transesophageal echocardiography, color flow Doppler mapping, and the principle of proximal flow convergence [see comments]. Circulation 1993; 87: 1591–1603.
Rebergen SA, van der Wall EE, Helbing WA, de Roos A, van Voorthuisen AE. Quantification of pulmonary and systemic blood flow by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the assessment of atrial-level shunts [see comments]. Int J Card Imaging 1996; 12: 143–152.
Mohiaddin RH, Underwood R, Romeira L, et al. Comparison between cine magnetic resonance velocity mapping and first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography for quantitating intracardiac shunts. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 529–532.
Akagi T, Kato H, Kiyomatsu Y, Saiki K, Suzuki K, Eto T. Evaluation of atrial, ventricular and atrioventricular septal defects by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1992; 34: 295–300.
Hundley WG, Li HF, Lange RA, et al. Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques. Circulation 1995; 91: 2955–2960.
Brenner LD, Caputo GR, Mostbeck G, et al. Quantification of left to right atrial shunts with velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 1246–1250.
Kalden P, Kreitner KF, Voigtlander T, et al. [Flow quantification of intracardiac shunt volumes using MR phase contrast technique in the breath holding phase.] Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998; 169: 378–373, 382.
Sieverding L, Jung WI, Klose U, Apitz J. Noninvasive blood flow measurement and quantification of shunt volume by cine magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease. Preliminary results. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22: 48–54.
Rees S, Firmin D, Mohiaddin R, Underwood R, Longmore D. Application of flow measurements by magnetic resonance velocity mapping to congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 953–956.
Bluemke DA, Boxerman JL, Mosher T, Lima JA. Segmented K-space cine breath-hold cardiovascular MR imaging: part 2. Evaluation of aortic vasculopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 401–407.
Bluemke DA, Boxerman JL, Atalar E, McVeigh ER. Segmented K-space cine breath-hold cardiovascular MR imaging: part 1. Principles and technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 395–400.
Underwood S, Firmin D, Klipstein R, Rees R, Longmore D. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. Br Heart J 1987; 57: 404–412.
Mostbeck GH, Caputo GR, Higgins CB. MR measurement of blood flow in the cardiovascular system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 453–461.
Grossman W. Shunt detection and measurement. In: Grossman W, Baim D, editors. Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1991; 166–181.
Flamm M, Cohn K, Hancock E. Ventricular function in atrial septal defect. Am J Med 1970; 48: 286–294.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Diethelm L, Teitel D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of congenital heart disease: sensitivity and specificity using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 155–161.
Dinsmore R, Wismer G, Guyer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the interatrial septum and atrial septal defects. AJR 1985; 145: 697–703.
Diethelm L, Déry R, Lipton M, Higgins C. Atrial-level shunts: sensitivity and specificity of MR in diagnosis. Radiology 1987; 162: 181–186.
Sechtem U, Pflugfelder P, Cassidy M, Holt W, Wolfe C, Higgins C. Ventricular septal defect: visualization of shunt flow and determination of shunt size by cine MR imaging. AJR 1987; 149: 689–692.
Rebergen S, Wall EVd, Doornbos J, Roos AD. Magnetic resonance measurement of velocity and flow: technique, validation and clinical applications. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1439–1456.
Mohiaddin R, Longmore D. Functional aspects of cardiovascular nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Techniques and application. Circulation 1993; 88: 264–281.
Cournand A, Riley R, Breed E. Measurement of cardiac output in man using the technique of catheterization of the right auricle or ventricle. J Clin Invest 1945; 24: 106–116.
Barratt-Boyes B, Wood E. The oxygen saturation of blood in the venae cavae, right-heart chambers, and pulmonary vessels of healthy subjects. J Lab Clin Med 1957; 50: 93–106.
Brannon E, Weens H, Warren J. Atrial septal defect: study of hemodynamics by the technique of right heart catheterization. Am J Med Sci 1945; 210: 480–491.
Mohiaddin RH. Assessment of intracardiac shunt by magnetic resonance imaging [editorial; comment]. Int J Card Imaging 1996; 12: 215–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petersen, S.E., Voigtländer, T., Kreitner, KF. et al. Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique – comparison with oximetry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 53–60 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014394626363
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014394626363