Abstract
Individuals with severe speech disability can benefit from the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) speech output assistive technology. The recent development of tools and methods for measuring AAC performance through the collection and analysis of language samples has advanced the clinical practice of this field. The definition of a new summary measure for characterizing performance of AAC systems in use is presented. The summary measure, here named rate index, is the average communication rate (in words per minute) divided by the selection rate (in bits per second) for the language sample. Thus the unit of measure for the rate index is words per bit. The rate index provides for the comparison of communication rates adjusted for differences in selection rates. Rate index comparisons can be made between individuals using similar or different systems or for one individual under different conditions. The clinical value of the rate index is the identification of opportunity for improved communication performance. Demonstrated rate index data also can serve as evidence to be used in the selection of AAC systems. The language sample data reported in this paper were collected using automated language activity monitoring (LAM).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASHA. (2001). Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Baker, B. (1986). Using images to generate speech. Byte, 11:160–168.
Bedrosian, J.L. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11:6–10.
Beukelman, D. and Ansel, B. (1995). Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4:131–134.
Beukelman, D.R. and Miranda P. (1998). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults, 2nd edn. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Burger, Sarah R. (1997). Spontaneous communication in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): A comparison of dynamic display and Minspeak. Department of Communication Disorders, College of Wooster, Wooster, OH. Available at www.aacinstitute.org.
Fitts, P.M. and Peterson, J.R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67:103–112.
Gardner-Bonneau, D.J. and Schwartz, P.J. (1989). A comparison of words strategy and traditional orthography. '89 Proceedings. Alrington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 286–287.
Hill, K. (2001). The development of a model for automated performance measurement and the establishment of performance indices for augmented communicators under two sampling conditions. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Hill, K. (2001). Achieving Success in AAC: Assessment and Intervention. AAC Institute Press. www.aacinstitute.org
Hill, K., Dollaghan, C., and Nyberg, E. (2000). AAC language sample library for intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) Convention, Washington, DC.
Hill, K. and Romich, B. (1999). A proposed standard for AAC and writing system data logging for clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. '99 Proceedings. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 22–24.
Hill, K. and Romich, B. (2001). AAC clinical summary measures for characterizing performance. CSUN Conference Proceedings. Los Angeles, CA. http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf2001/proceedings/ 0098hill.html
Hill, K., Romich, B., and Holko, R. (2001). AAC performance: The elements of communication rate. '01. New Orleans, LA.
Koester, H.H. and Levine, S.P. (1994a). Modeling the speed of text entry with a word prediction interface. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 2(3):177–187.
Koester, H.H. and Levine, S.P. (1994b). Learning and performance of able-bodied individuals using scanning systems with and without word prediction. Assistive Technology, 6(1):42–53.
Lloyd, L.L., Fuller, D.R., and Arvidson, H.H. (1997). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Principles and Practices. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Owens, R.E. (1996). Language Development: An Introduction, 4th edn. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Romich, B.A. and Hill, K.J. (1999). A language activity monitor for AAC and writing systems: Clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. '99 Proceedings, Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 19–21.
Romich, B.A. and Hill, K.J. (2000). AAC communication rate measurement: Tools and methods for clinical use. '00 Proceedings. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 58–60. ]
Romich, B.A. and Hill, K.J. (2000). Language activity monitor feasibility study. National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health (NIH Grant No. 1 R43 DC 4246-01). Washington, DC: NIH.
Romich, B.A., Hill, K.J., and Spaeth, D.M. (2001). AAC selection rate measurement: A method for clinical use based on spelling. '01 Proceedings. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 52–54.
Romich, B.A., Hill, K.J., and Spaeth, D.M. (2000). AAC selection rate measurement: Tools and methods for clinical use. '00 Proceedings. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press, pp. 61–63.
Romich, B., Vanderheiden, G., and Hill, K. (2000). Augmentative communication. In J.D. Bronzine (Ed.), Biomedical Engineering Handbook, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 101–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, K., Romich, B. A Rate Index for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. International Journal of Speech Technology 5, 57–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013638916623
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013638916623