Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Social Psychophysics of Cooperation: Nonverbal Communication in a Public Goods Game

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that cooperation in a social dilemma context could be facilitated by inducing participants to emit “social psychophysical” cues, information in the perceptual array that affords meaningful and consequential social inferences. In particular, participants were asked to engage in mutual eye gaze, to touch one another gently, to communicate in a virtual chat room, or to tap out rhythms in synchrony. All but the last of these manipulations increased contributions to a public good in all-male but not all-female groups. These results suggest the inference systems that are engaged when individuals make decisions about whether or not to cooperate in a group context are responsive to relatively low level nonverbal behavioral cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, J. K., & Hendricks, B. (1997). Effects of interpersonal touch, degree of justification, and sex of subject on compliance with a request. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, G., & Rapoport, A. (1988). Intergroup competition for the provision of step-level public goods: Effects of preplay communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouas, K. S., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1144–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 554–594). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effect of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael, L. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1991). Reviving evolutionary psychology: Biology meets culture. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P. (1996). The group-based binding pledge as a solution to public goods problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P., & Komorita, S. S. (1994). The effects of communication and commitment in a public goods social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 49–65). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, R. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (in press). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In C. Plott and V. Smith. (Eds.)., Handbook of experimental economics results. New York: Elsevier.

  • Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research, 35, 2089–2093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, S. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism, and aggression: A clarification of functional differences. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 275–291). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1997). The modularity of social intelligence. In A. Whiten & R. W. Byrne (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations (pp. 264–288). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M., Kiyohara, O., & Pfannensteil, D. A. (1985). Interpersonal touch, social labeling, and the foot-in-the-door effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Kruck, K. B., & Magnusson, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, J. (1987). The effect of touch and gaze upon compliance and interest of interviewees. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 681–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W. (1980). The rhythmic basis of interactional micro-synchrony. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 67–75). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L. (1980). Interaction between gaze and legitimacy of request on compliance in a field setting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R. (1998). The social psychophysics of cooperation in groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. (2000). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (in press). Commitment and reciprocity in a real-time public goods game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

  • Ledyard, J. O. (1996). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & DeVore, I. (Eds.). (1968). Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., & Ames, R. (1979). Experiments in the provision of public goods, I: Resources, interest, group size and the free rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1335–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. B. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1988). Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of inequality in resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Bornstein, G. (1989). Solving public good problems in competition between equal and unequal size groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 460–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S., & Brinkman, H. (1995). Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: Effects of culture, gender, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E., Gier, J. A., & Willis, F. N. (1982). Interpersonal touch and compliance with a marketing request. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, L. (1969). Men in groups. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations (Tech Rep. No. 88–1). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Evolutionary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker's paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Meertens, R. M. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichman, H. (1970). Effect of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Jackson, J. M., & Karau, S. J. (1995). Collective hedonism: A social loafing analysis of social dilemmas. In D. A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups. (p. 115–141). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, F. N., & Hamm, H. K. (1980). The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. K., & Sell, J. (1997). "Liar, liar..." Cheap talk and reputation in repeated public goods settings. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 695–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, A. P., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). The effect of social categorization on cooperation in three types of social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1997). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106

    Robert Kurzban

  2. Department of Anthropology, University of California Los Angeles, 3207 Hershey Hall, Box 951553, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1553

    Robert Kurzban

Authors
  1. Robert Kurzban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Kurzban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurzban, R. The Social Psychophysics of Cooperation: Nonverbal Communication in a Public Goods Game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25, 241–259 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012563421824

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012563421824

Search

Navigation