Abstract
Students in 4 inner-city middle schools serving mostly (90.9%) economically disadvantaged, minority youth were asked how they spend their time after school and on weekends. Analysis of responses from 1583 students revealed that the vast majority did not participate in after-school programs (77.2%) or lessons of any kind (86.5%). Students reported extensive time spent watching television or hanging out with friends. Weekends presented a similar pattern of unstructured social activity with even more television viewing and considerably less homework. Four-way ANOVAs of 13 composite time measures for a week revealed no significant school differences, only 2 significant grade differences, but several interesting and highly significant differences by sex and by race. Implications for designing after school programs are discussed in light of the students' highly unproductive use of time outside of school.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bergin, D., Hudson, L., Chryst, C., & Resetar, M. (1992). An after school intervention program for educationally disadvantaged young children. The Urban Review 24 (3), 203-217.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Chadwick, B. & Heaton, T. (1996). Statistical handbook on adolescents in America. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Curwin, R. (1993). The healing power of altruism. Educational Leadership 51 (3), 36-39.
Dowd, F. (1995). Public library programs for latchkey children: A status report. Public Libraries 34 (5), 291-295.
Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fashola, O.S. (1999). After-school programs and student misbehavior. [On-line]. Available: http:// vweb.hwwilsonweb.com/ Also in The Education Digest 65 (3), 62-66.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (1996). Crime in the United States: Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Fight Crime (1999, August). Law enforcement united in calling for crime-prevention investments: Police chief poll report. [On-line]. Available: http://www.fightcrime.org/reports/police-chiefspoll-report.html
Fight Crime (1999, October). Back to school Poll. [On-line]. Available: http://www.fightcrime.org/ reports/poll-back-to-school.html
Fox, J. A. (1999). Juvenile violence in the after school hours: Release of the 1996 data for eight states. [On-line]. Available: http:www.cj.neu.edu/fox/timeofday96web.htm
Hatkoff, A. (1994). Safety and children: How schools can help. Childhood Education 70 (5), 283-286.
Hebert, E. (1993). Doing something about children at risk. National Institute of Justice Journal 227, 4-9.
Lake Snell Perry and Associates/The Tarrance Group. (1998). After-school crime. Flint, MI: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.
Jacobs, S. (1990, March 18). Teen-agers find haven in downtown mall. The Boston Sunday Globe, pp. 25-26.
Jones, J. (1995). Extending school hours: A capital idea. Educational Leadership 53 (3), 44-46.
Lippmann, L., Burns, S., McArthur, E., Burton, R., Smith, T., & Kaufman, P. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty NCES 96-184. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.
McLaughlin, M. & Irby, M. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations that keep hope alive. Phi Delta Kappan 76 (4), 300-306.
Popwell, E. (1991). The after school program for school age children. A descriptive report. Atlanta, GA: Atlanta Public Schools.
Posner, J. & Vandell, D. (1994). Low income children's after school care: Are there beneficial side effects of after school programs? Child Development 65 (2), 440-456.
Radin, C.A. (2000, January 19). Anticrime strategy lauded, but flaw noted. The Boston Globe, 3. Ryan, K. (1993). Mining the values in the curriculum. Educational Leadership 51 (3), 16-18.
Shann, Mary H. (1999). Academics and a culture of caring: The relationship between school achievement and prosocial and antisocial behaviors in four urban middle schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 10 (4), 390-413.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1988). Youth indicators 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1996). Youth indicators 1996. [On-line]. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/yi/y9640c.html
U.S. Department of Education Partnership for Family Involvement in Education and the GTE Foundation (1998). Family involvement in education: A snapshot of out-of-school time. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1998). Homicide trends in the U.S.: Age trends. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/teens.htm
Walker, G. (1996). Back to basics: A new/old direction for youth policy. Public/Private Venture News 11 (2), 9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shann, M.H. Students' Use of Time Outside of School: A Case for After School Programs for Urban Middle School Youth. The Urban Review 33, 339–356 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012248414119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012248414119