Skip to main content
Log in

Venesection needle coring increases positive results with RT-PCR for detection of circulating cells expressing CEA mRNA

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed whether circulating cell positivity using RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) cDNA was affected by venesection via a needle compared/with a pre-aspirated venous cannula, and by increased PCR cycles. Systemic blood was sampled by needle and pre-aspirated cannula in 101 healthy individuals with no cancer history. After erythrocyte removal, samples were subjected to RT-PCR using specific primers for CEA, with 29 or 35 RT-PCR cycles. There was a significant difference between the number of subjects whose samples were negative when collected via needle venesection and positive when collected via pre-aspirated cannula, compared with positive by needle venesection and negative by pre-aspirated cannula for both 29 (P=0.016) and 35 (P=0.011) RT-PCR cycles. Venesection technique (P=0.01) and number of cycles (P=0.003) were significant predictors of a positive result. Positive results in healthy subjects were reduced to less than 3% when an aspirated cannula was used for venesection and >29 PCR cycles were avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jonas S, Windeatt SAOB, Fordy C et al. Identification of carcinoembryonic antigen-producing cells circulating in the blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Gut 1996; 39: 717–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peck K, Sher YP, Shih JY et al. Detection and quantitation of circulating cancer cells in the peripheral blood of lung cancer patients. Cancer Res 1998; 2761–5

  3. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 1987; 162: 156–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson J, Mossinger S, Reichardt V et al. A polymerase-chainreaction assay for the specific identification of transcripts encoded by individual carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-gene-family members. Int J Cancer 1993; 55: 311–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leach, C. Tests for one sample or two related samples. In: Introduction to Statistics: A Non-Parametric Approach for the Social Sciences, pp 133–136. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon, W. Logistic regression. In: BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Release 7, pp 1105–1143. Los Angeles: University of California Press 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foss AJE, Guille MJ, Occlestone NL et al. The detection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer 1995; 72: 155–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keilholz U, Willhauck M, Rimoldi D et al. Reliability of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays for the detection of circulating tumour cells: a quality-assurance initiative of the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 750–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Funaki NO, Tanaka J, Ohshio G et al. Cytokeratin 20 mRNA in peripheral venous blood of colorectal carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 1327–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Castells A, Boix L, Bessa X et al. Detection of colonic cells in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer 1998; 78: 1368–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemoine A, LeBricon T, Salvucci M et al. Prospective evaluation of circulating hepatocytes by alpha-fetoprotein mRNA in humans during liver surgery. Ann Surgery 1997; 226: 43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burchill SA, Bradbury MF, Pittman K et al. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 278–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyld DK, Selby P, Perren TJ et al. Detection of colorectal cancer cells in the peripheral blood by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for cytokeratin 20. Int J Cancer 1998; 79: 288–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wharton RQ, Jonas SK, Glover C et al. Increased detection of circulating tumor cells in the blood of colorectal carcinoma patients using two reverse transcription-PCR assays and multiple blood samples. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 4158–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chelly J, Concordet JP, Kaplan JC, Kahn A. Illegitimate transcription: transcription of any gene in any cell type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 2617–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith MR, Biggar S, Hussain M. Prostatic-specific antigen messenger RNA is expressed in non-prostatic cells: Implications for the detection of micrometastases. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 2640.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilchik A, Miyashiro M, Kelley M et al. Molecular detection of metastatic pancreatic carcinoma cells using a multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Cancer 2000; 88: 1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wharton, R., Patel, H., Jonas, S. et al. Venesection needle coring increases positive results with RT-PCR for detection of circulating cells expressing CEA mRNA. Clin Exp Metastasis 18, 291–294 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011034302639

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011034302639

Navigation