Skip to main content
Log in

Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1–9mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate breast cancer survival in small invasive breast cancers in relation to mammographic findings.

Materials and methods. We investigated a consecutive series of 96 cases of 1–9mm small invasive breast cancers diagnosed 1988–1994. Median follow-up of the survivors was 7 years (range: 4.5–10.5). Mammographic findings were classified into rounded masses, spiculated masses, calcifications (casting or pleomorphic) and masses combined with calcifications. Lymph node status and histological malignancy grade were also evaluated. Eight year survival rate in breast cancer was estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and risk of death with proportional-hazards regression.

Results. 6/96 women died from breast cancer. 3/14 had calcifications alone, 2/56 with spiculated masses, 1/12 with rounded masses. 5/78 who died were node-negative cancers and 1/4 was node-positive. The survival rate for the whole group was 93%: 77% for the calcifications alone group, 95% for spiculated masses and 91% for rounded masses. The survival rate for the node-negative cancers was 92% compared to 75% for node-positive cancers. Calcifications alone (p=0.01) and node positivity (p=0.03) had each independent significant higher risk of death taking finding, node status and grade into account.

Conclusion. Small invasive breast cancers mammographically presenting as casting or pleomorphic calcifications alone have a significantly worse prognosis than other types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tabár L, Chen H-H, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, Dean PB: A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study. Lancet 355: 429-433, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thurfjell E: Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results (diss.). Acta Radiol Suppl 395: 1-22, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADSTM). 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, 1998

  4. Elston CW, Ellis IO: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19: 403-410, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tabár L, Dean PB: Teaching Atlas of Mammography. George Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lanyi M: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Calci-fications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Snead DR, Wilson AR, Ellis IO, Elston CW: The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours. Br J Cancer 75: 542-544, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Padmore RF, Fowble B, Hoffman J, Rosser C, Hanlon A, Patchefsky AS: Microinvasive breast carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of a single institution experience. Cancer 88: 1403-1409, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thurfjell, E., Thurfjell, M.G. & Lindgren, A. Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1–9mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat 67, 177–180 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010648919150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010648919150

Navigation