Skip to main content
Log in

Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses problems and solutions in thegovernance of knowledge exchange and joint knowledgeproduction. The analysis is based on a theory whichcombines elements of transaction cost economics,social exchange theory and theory of knowledge. Thetheory of knowledge yields an analysis of absorptivecapacity, communicative capacity and learning byinteraction. In that setting, the paper analysesproblems of governance: hold-up problems as a resultof specific investments in setting up knowledgeexchange, spill-over problems, a trade-off betweenstability and change of exchange relations, and atrade-off between novelty and understandability(`cognitive distance'). A survey is given ofcontingencies that affect the size of problems and theefficacy of instruments for their governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. and D. Schö n: 1978, Organizational Learning (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W.E. and D. Obstfeld: 1999, “Social Capital by Design: Structures, Strategies, and Institutional Context”, in R.Th.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D.J. and G. Labianca: 1999, “Social Capital, Social Liabilities, and Social Resources Management”, in R.Th.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid: 1996, “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice”, in M.D. Cohen and L.S. Sproull (eds.), Organizational Learning (London: Sage), pp. 58–82. First printed in 1991 Organization Science 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. and D.J. Teece: 1996, “When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation”, Harvard Business Review (Jan.-Feb.): 65–73.

  • Choo, C.W.: 1998, The Knowing Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal: 1990, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C.M. and M.A. Lyles: 1985, “Organizational Learning”, Academy of Management Review 10(4): 803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, M. and M. Benassi: 1999, “The Dark Side of Social Capital”, in R.Th.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 298–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (ed.): 1999, Interfirm Networks; Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R.: 1995, “Does Familiarity Breed Trust?' The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances”, Academy of Management Journal 30(1): 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks-Jansen, H.: 1996, Catching Ourselves in the Act; Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution and Human Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B.L.T., P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck: 1976, “Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks-Jansen, H.: 1996, Catching Ourselves in the Act; Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution and Human Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson: 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R.: 1993, Beyond Partnership (New York: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1985, Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Aalborg: Aalborg University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1988, “Innovation as an Interactive Process-from User-Producer Interaction to National Systems of Innovation”, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, C. Nelson, R. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.), Technology and Economic Theory (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1993, “User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalization”, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds.), Technology and theWealth of Nations (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1985, Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Aalborg: Aalborg University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1988, “Innovation as an Interactive Process-from User-Producer Interaction to National Systems of Innovation”, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, C. Nelson, R. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.), Technology and Economic Theory (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A.: 1993, “User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalization”, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds.), Technology and theWealth of Nations (London: Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1988, “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust”, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust; Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1992, “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Transactions”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2: 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1996, “Trust, Opportunism and Governance: A Process and Control Model”, Organization Studies 17(6): 985–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1998, “Cost, Quality and Learning Based Governance of Buyer-Supplier Relations”, in M.G. Colombo (ed.), The Changing Boundaries of the Firm (London: Routledge), pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1999a, Inter-Firm Alliances; Analysis and Design (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1999b, “Roles of the Go-Between”, in R.Th.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (eds.), Corporate Social Capital (Deventer: Kluwer), pp. 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1999c, “Innovation and Inter-Firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy”, Research Policy 28: 793–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B.: 1999d, “Learning, Innovation and Industrial Organization”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 127–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., J. Berger and N.G. Noorderhaven: 1997, “Effects of Trust and Governance on Relational Risk”, Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 308–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.: 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1962, Personal Knowledge (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. and G. Hamel: 1990, “The Core Competences of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review (May-June).

  • Schein, E.H.: 1985, Organizational Culture and Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, B.: 1990, “What Is Context?”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(2): 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, B.: 1993, The Representational and the Presentational (New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, B.: 1988, “Semantic Representation of Meaning: A Critique”, Psychological Bulletin 104(1): 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L.: 1983, “Organization as Shared Meaning”, in L.R. Pondy, P.J. Frost, G. Morgan and T.C. Dandridge (eds.), Organizational Symbolism (Greenwich CT: JAI Press), pp. 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D.: 1967, Organizations in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Doerr, L., J.O. Owen-Smith, K.W. Koput and W.W. Powell: 1999, “Networks and Knowledge Production: Collboration and Patenting in Biotechnology”, in R.Th.A.J. Leenders and S.M. Gabbay (eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J.: 1986, “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy”, Research Policy 15: 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky: 1962, Thought and Language (edited and translated by E. Hanfmann and G. Varkar) (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.F.: 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.F.: 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations (Thousand Oaks CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1993, “Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization”, Journal of Law and Economics 36: 453–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G.: 1964, “Economic “Natural Selection” and the Theory of the Firm”, Yale Economic Essays (Spring) 4: 225–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U.: 1998, Between Entrepreneurial Leadership and Managerial Governance; the Contingent Ontogeny of the Firm Organization. Paper DRUID conference, Bornholm, 9–11 June.

  • Zucker, L.G.: 1986, “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure 1840-1920”, in B.A. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 8, pp. 53–111.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nooteboom, B. Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance. Journal of Management & Governance 4, 69–92 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009941416749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009941416749

Navigation