Abstract
How does the economy react to the arrival of a new major technology? The existing literature on general-purpose technologies (GPTs) has studied the role that mechanisms like secondary innovations, diffusion, and learning by firms play in the adjustment process. By contrast, we focus on a new mechanism: the interplay between technological change and two types of human capital—technology-specific experience and education. We show that technological change that requires more education and training, like computerization, necessarily produces an initial slowdown. On the other hand, technological change that lowers the training requirements, like the move from the artisan shop to the factory, can produce either a bust or a boom. We identify three key properties that determine the outcome: (1) the productivity of inexperienced workers, (2) the speed with which experience raises productivity, and (3) the level of general skills required to operate the new technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acemoglu, Daron. (1998). "Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality." Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1055–1089.
Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. (1998). "On the Macroeconomic Effects of Major Technological Change." In Elhanan Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Autor, David H., Lawrence F. Katz, and Alan B. Krueger. (1998). "Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?" Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1169–1213.
Bartel, Ann P., and Frank Lichtenberg. (1987). "The Comparative Advantage of EducatedWorkers in Implementing New Technologies." Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 1–11.
Blanchard, Olivier, and Michael Kremer. (1997). "Disorganization." Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1091–1126.
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manual Trajtenberg. (1995). "General Purpose Technologies: 'Engines of Growth'?" Journal of Econometrics 65, 83–108.
Brezis, Elise S., Paul R. Krugman, and Daniel Tsiddon. (1993). "Leapfrogging in International Competition." American Economic Review 83, 1211–1219.
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Lorin M. Hitt. (1998). "Information Technology and Organizational Design: Evidence from Micro Data." Mimeo.
David, Paul. (1991). "Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror." In Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy. Paris: OECD.
Du Boff, Richard B. (1964). "The Introduction of Electric Power in American Manufacturing." Economic History Review 20, 509–518.
Goldin, Claudia, and Lawrence F. Katz. (1998). "The Origins of Technology-Skill Complementarity." Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 693–732.
Greenwood, Jeremy, and Mehemet Yorokolgu. (1997). "1974." Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46, 49–95.
Helpman, Elhanan (ed.). (1998). General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Helpman, Elhanan, and Antonio Rangel. (1998). "Adjusting to a New Technology: Experience and Training." NBER Working Paper No. 6551.
Helpman, Elhanan, and Manual Trajtenberg. (1998a). "Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies." In Elhanan Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Helpman, Elhanan, and Manuel Trajtenberg. (1998b). "A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies." In Elhanan Helpman (ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hornstein, Andreas, and Per Krusell. (1996). "Can Technology Improvements Cause Productivity Slowdowns?" NBER Macroeconomic Annual 209–259.
Murphy, Kevin M., and Finis Welch. (1990). "Empirical Age-Earning Profiles." Journal of Labor Economics 8, 202–229.
von Tunzelmann, G. N. (1978). Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helpman, E., Rangel, A. Adjusting to a New Technology: Experience and Training. Journal of Economic Growth 4, 359–383 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009888907797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009888907797