Skip to main content
Log in

Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from 3991 records of museum collections representing 421 species of plants, arthropods, amphibians, fish, and primates were analyzed with GIS to identify areas of high species diversity and endemism in Amazonia. Of the 472 1 × 1° grid cells in Amazonia, only nine cells are included in the highest species diversity category (43–67 total species) and nine in the highest endemic species diversity category (4–13 endemic species). Over one quarter of the grid cells have no museum records of any of the organisms in our study. Little correspondence exists between the centers of species diversity identified by our collections-based data and those areas recommended for conservation in an earlier qualitative study of Amazonian biodiversity. Museum collections can play a vital role in identifying species-rich areas for potential conservation in Amazonia, but a concerted and structured effort to increase the number and distribution of collections is needed to take maximum advantage of the information they contain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ab'Sáber, A.N. (1977) Os domínios morfoclimáticos na América do sul. Primeira aproximaçâo. Geomorfologia 53, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. (1994) Area and endemism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 69, 451–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1991) Workshop 90: Biological Priorities for Conservation in Amazonia (map and explanatory text). Washington, DC: Conservation International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jr, K.S. (1987) Biogeography and evolution of neotropical butterflies. In Biogeography and Quaternary History in Tropical America (T.C. Whitmore and G.T. Prance, eds) pp. 66–104. Oxford: Oxford Monographs on Biogeography, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. (1988) Species diversity. In Analytical Biogeography (A.A. Myers and P.S. Giller, eds) pp. 57–89. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A.P., Rodriguez, J.P., Roberts, W.M. and Wilcove, D.S. (1997) Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, T.L. (1991) An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science 253, 750–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffer, J. (1969) Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165, 131–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.B., Groop, R.E. and Jenks, G.F. (1988) CLASSY, Version 3. East Lansing, Michigan: Geography Department, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrone, J.J. (1994) On the identification of areas of endemism. Syst. Biol. 43, 438–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B.W., Ferreira, C.A.C., da Silva, M.F. and Kawasaki, M.L. (1990) Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345, 714–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G.T. (1982) Forest refuges: evidence from woody angiosperms. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics (G.T. Prance, ed) pp. 137–57. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J.R. and Eversham, B.C. (1997) Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20, 210–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect? systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R.S. and Emmons, L.H. (1996) Mammalian diversity in neotropical lowland rainforest: a preliminary assessment. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 230, 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C. and Pressey, R. (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10, 155–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1988) The current state of biological diversity. In Biodiversity (E. O. Wilson and F.M. Peter, eds) pp. 3–18. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kress, W.J., Heyer, W.R., Acevedo, P. et al. Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1577–1587 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008889803319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008889803319

Navigation